Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-19T06:58:14.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improving Assessment Centers by the Trimodal Concept of Personnel Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Heinz Schuler*
Affiliation:
University of Hohenheim
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology (540F), University of Hohenheim, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2008 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Heinz Schuler, Department of Psychology (540F), University of Hohenheim

References

Bray, D. W., & Grant, D. L. (1966). The assessment center in the measurement of potential for business management. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 80, 127.Google Scholar
Gaugler, B. B., Rosenthal, D. B., Thornton, G. C. III, & Bentson, C. (1987). Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 493511.Google Scholar
Görlich, Y., Schuler, H., Becker, K., & Diemand, A. (2007). Evaluation zweier Potenzialanalyseverfahren zur internen Auswahl und Klassifikation [Evaluation of two assessment centers for internal selection and classification]. In Schuler, H. (Ed.), Assessment Center zur Potenzialanalyse [Assessment center for the analysis of potential] (pp. 203232). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Hardison, C. M., & Sackett, P. R. (2007). Kriterienbezogene Validität des Assessment Centers: lebendig und wohlauf? [Assessment center criterion related validity: Alive and well?]. In Schuler, H. (Ed.), Assessment Center zur Potenzialanalyse [Assessment center for the analysis of potential] (pp. 192202). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Krause, D. E., Gebert, D., & Thornton, G. C. III. (2007). Interkulturelle Unterschiede in der Assessment Center-Anwendung [Intercultural differences in assessment center application]. In Schuler, H. (Ed.), Assessment Center zur Potenzialanalyse [Assessment center for the analysis of potential] (pp. 359378). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Lance, C. E. (2008). Why assessment centers do not work the way they are supposed to. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 8497.Google Scholar
Roth, P. L., Bobko, P., & McFarland, L. A. (2005). A meta-analysis of work sample test validity: Updating and integrating some classic literature. Personnel Psychology, 58, 10091037.Google Scholar
Sackett, P. R., & Dreher, G. F. (1982). Constructs and assessment center dimensions: Some troubling empirical findings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 401410.Google Scholar
Schuler, H. (Ed.). (2006). Lehrbuch der Personalpsychologie [Personnel psychology] (2nd ed.). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Schuler, H. (2007). Assessment Center als multiples Verfahren zur Potenzialanalyse [Assessment centers as a multiple procedure for the analysis of potential]. In Schuler, H. (Ed.), Assessment Center zur Potenzialanalyse [Assessment center for the analysis of potential] (pp. 336). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Schuler, H., Becker, K., & Diemand, A. (2007). Potenzialanalysen als Grundlage von Personalentscheidungen in einer Dienstleistungsorganisation [Assessment of potential as a basis of personnel decisions in a service organization]. In Schuler, H. (Ed.), Assessment Center zur Potenzialanalyse [Assessment center for the analysis of potential] (pp. 297312). Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.Google Scholar
Wernimont, P. E., & Campbell, J. B. (1968). Signs, samples, and criteria. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 372376.Google Scholar