Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:16:35.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Light Already Defines the Darkness: Understanding Normal and Maladaptive Personality in the Workplace

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2015

Neil D. Christiansen ,
Stuart W. Quirk ,
Chet Robie  and
Frederick L. Oswald
Neil D. Christiansen*
Affiliation:
Central Michigan University
Stuart W. Quirk
Affiliation:
Central Michigan University
Chet Robie
Affiliation:
Wilfrid Laurier University
Frederick L. Oswald
Affiliation:
Rice University
*
E-mail: [email protected], Address: Department of Psychology, Central Michigan University, Mount Pleasant, MI 48858
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Commentaries
Information
Industrial and Organizational Psychology , Volume 7 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 138 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Psychological Association (APA). (2010). American Psychological Association Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct. Retrieved August 9, 2013, from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdfGoogle Scholar
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. (1990). Retrieved August 8, 2013, from http://www.ada.gov/pubs/ada.htmGoogle Scholar
Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., deVries, R. E., Hendrickse, J., & Born, M. P. (2012). The maladaptive personality traits of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in relation to the HEXACO personality factors and schizotypy/dissociation. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 641–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benson, M. J., & Campbell, J. P. (2007). To be, or not to be, linear: An expanded representation of personality and its relationship to leadership performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15(2), 232–249.Google Scholar
Blashfield, R. K., & Reynolds, S. M. (2012). An invisible college view of the DSM-5 personality disorder classification. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 821–829.Google Scholar
Christiansen, N. D., & Robie, C. (2011). Further consideration of the use of narrow trait scales. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 43, 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, N. D., & Tett, R. P. (2008). Toward a better understanding of the role of situations in linking personality, work behavior, and job performance. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 3, 312–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christiansen, N. D., & Tett, R. P. (2013). The long and winding road: An introduction to the handbook of personality at work. In Christiansen, N. D., & Tett, R. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality at work (pp. 1–7). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Collins, J. M., & Schmidt, F. L. (1997). Can suppressor variables enhance criterion-related validity in the personality domain? Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57, 924–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P. T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
De Fruyt, F., De Clercq, B., De Bolle, M., Willie, B., Markon, K., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample. Assessment, 20, 295–307.Google Scholar
De Fruyt, F., De Clercq, B. J., Miller, J., Rolland, J., Jung, S., Taris, R., … Van Hiel, A. (2009). Assessing personality at risk in personnel selection and development. European Journal of Personality, 23, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritzsche, B. A., McIntire, S. A., & Yost, A. P. (2002). Holland type as a moderator of personality-performance predictions. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 60, 422–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guenole, N. (2014). Maladaptive personality at work: Exploring the darkness. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 7(1), 85–97.Google Scholar
Harkness, A. R., & McNulty, J. L. (1994). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Issue from the pages of a diagnostic manual instead of a dictionary. In Strack, S., & Lorr, M. (Eds.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (pp. 291–315). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Harms, P. D., Spain, S. M., & Hannah, S. T. (2011). Leader development and the dark side of personality. Leadership Quarterly, 22, 495–509.Google Scholar
Hartley, E. L. (1967). Attitude research and the jangle fallacy. In Sherif, C. W., & Sherif, M. (Eds.), Attitude, ego-involvement and change (pp. 88–104). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, H. A., & De Fruyt, F. (2013). NEO-PI-3 Persoonlijkheidsvragenlijst [NEO-PI-3 personality inventory]. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1997). Hogan Development Survey manual. Tulsa, OK: Hogan Assessment Systems.Google Scholar
Jones, J. W., & Arnold, D. W. (2008). Protecting the legal and appropriate use of personality testing: A practitioner perspective. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 296–298.Google Scholar
Judge, T. A., Bono, J. E., & Locke, E. A. (2000). Personality and job satisfaction: The mediating role of job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 237–249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karraker v. Rent-A-Center. 411 F.3d 831, 833 (7th Cir. 2005).Google Scholar
Kelly, T. L. (1927). Interpretation of educational measurements. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book Company.Google Scholar
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879–1890.Google Scholar
Lilienfeld, S. O., Watts, A. L., & Smith, S. F. (2012). The DSM revision as a social psychological process: A commentary on Blashfield and Reynolds. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 830–834.Google Scholar
McFarland, L. A. (2013). Applicant reactions to personality tests: Why do applicants hate them? In Christiansen, N. D., & Tett, R. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality at work (pp. 281–298). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moyle, P. (1995). The role of negative affectivity in the stress process: Tests of alternative models. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 16, 647–668.Google Scholar
Myors, B., Lievens, F., Schollaert, E., van Hoye, G., Croneshaw, S., Mladinic, A., … Sackett, P. R. (2008). International perspectives on legal issues in employee selection. Industrial and Organizational Psychology: Perspectives on Science and Practice, 1, 206–246.Google Scholar
Organ, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1995). A meta-analytic review of attitudinal and dispositional predictors of organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 48, 775–802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, S. W., Christiansen, N. D., Wagner, S. H., & McNulty, J. L. (2003). On the usefulness of measures of normal personality for clinical assessment: Evidence of incremental validity of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 15, 311–325.Google Scholar
Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analytic review of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: A facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 28, 1326–1342.Google Scholar
Sarup, G. (1978). Historical antecedents of psychology: The recurrent issue of old wine in new bottles. American Psychologist, 34, 478–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmit, M. J., & Ryan, A. M. (2013). Legal issues in personality testing. In Christiansen, N. D., & Tett, R. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality at work (pp. 525–542). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shoss, M. K., & Witt, L. A. (2013). Trait interactions and other configural approaches to personality. In Christiansen, N. D., & Tett, R. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality at work (pp. 392–418). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Soroka v. Dayton Hudson Corp. 6 Ind. Empl. Rights Case (BNA) 1491 (Cal. Ct. App. 1991).Google Scholar
Stabile, S. J. (2002). The use of personality tests as a hiring tool: Is the benefit worth the cost? University of Pennsylvania Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 4, 279–313.Google Scholar
Strack, S. (2006). Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Tett, R. P., Simonet, D. V., Walser, B., & Brown, C. (2013). Trait activation theory: Applications, developments, and implications for person-workplace fit. In Christiansen, N. D., & Tett, R. P. (Eds.), Handbook of personality at work (pp. 71–100). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Thimm, J. C. (2011). Incremental validity of maladaptive schemas over five-factor model facets in the prediction of personality disorder symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 777–782.Google Scholar
Watson, D., Stasik, S. M., Ro, E., & Clark, L. A. (2013). Integrating normal and pathological personality: Relating the DSM-5 trait-dimensional model to general traits of personality. Assessment, 20, 312–326.Google Scholar
Widiger, T. A., Costa, P. T. Jr., & Samuel, D. B. (2006). Assessment of maladaptive personality traits. In Strack, S. (Ed.), Differentiating normal and abnormal personality (2nd ed., pp. 311–335). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Wille, B., De Fruyt, F., & De Clercq, B. (2013). Expanding and reconceptualizing aberrant personality at work: Validity of five-factor model aberrant personality tendencies to predict career outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 66, 173–223.Google Scholar