Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:15:56.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“There is no evidence to suggest …”: Changing The Way We Judge Information For Disclosure in the Informed Consent Process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Leslie Cannold
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Feminist health activists and medical researchers frequently disagree on the adequacy of the informed consent processes in clinical trials. I argue for an informed consent process that reflects the central importance of patient-participant autonomy. Such a standard may raise concerns for medical researchers about their capacity to control the quantity and quality of the information they disclose to potential participants. These difficulties might be addressed by presenting potential participants with differently sized disclosure packages.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , Spring 1997 , pp. 165 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

“Abortion pill trial halted as consent process checked.” 1994. The Age, 18 August, 6.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom, and Childress, James. 1989. Principles of biomedical ethics. 3d. ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bleier, Ruth. 1986. Introduction. Ii Feminist approaches to science, ed. Bleier, R.New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Cannold, Leslie. 1994. A Question of control: The tussle over informed consent in the Melbourne trial of RU486/PG. Healthsharing Women: The Newsletter of the Healthsharing Women's Health Resource Service 5(2): 1–2.Google Scholar
Reprinted in Fertility rights or wrongs?: Issues for the Nineties Vol 46, ed. Healey, Kaye. 1995. Australia: The Spinney Press.Google Scholar
Centre for the Study of Mothers' and Children's Health. 1996. M & C News 6. Centre of the Study Mothers' and Children's Health, La Trobe University, Carlton, Victoria .Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1993. Taking subjectivity into account. Ii Feminist epistemologies, ed. Alcoff, Linda and Potter, Elizabeth. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Corea, Gena. 1985. The mother machine: Reproductive technologies from artificial insemination to artificial wombs. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Dang, Julie. 1994. Breakthrough study on community attitudes to health care. Sudler and Hennesey Report.Google Scholar
Dawes, Patrick, and Davison, Pauline. 1994. Informed consent: what do patients want to know? Monash Bioethics Review 13(4): 20–26.Google Scholar
De Ruyter, Peter. 1996. New research priorities in HIV/AIDS: The role of natural therapies. Diversity: The magazine of the Australian Complementary Health Association (9 December): 9–12.Google Scholar
Dow, Steve. 1994. Review backs abortion pill trial. The Age, 4 November, 3.Google Scholar
Dumble, Lynette. 1994. Abortion pill debate: Is there a hidden agenda? The Age, 16 August, 14.Google Scholar
Eccles‐Smith, Charles, and Oakley, Justin. 1993. Informed consent and coronary bypass surgery. Modern Medicine 35(9): 27–32.Google Scholar
Ewing, Tania. 1994. Tell trial volunteers about ‘abortion pill’ risks: doctor. The Age, 13 July, 3.Google Scholar
Faden, Ruth, and Beauchamp, Tom. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fee, Elizabeth. 1984. Women's nature and scientific objectivity. Ii Women's nature: Rationalizations of inequality, ed. Lowe, Marian and Hubbard, Ruth. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Feinberg, Joel. 1973. Social philosophy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Fried, Charles. 1974. Medical experimentation: Personal integrity and social policy. New York: American Elsevier.Google Scholar
Harrison, Michelle. 1994. Forward. Ii Men who control women's health: The miseducation of obstetrician‐gynecologists, by Scully, Diana. New York, London: Athene Series, Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, Bequaert Helen. 1992. Can clinical research be both ethical and scientific: A commentary inspired by Rosser and Marquis. Ii Feminist perspectives in medical ethics, ed. Holmes, Helen Bequaert and Purdy, Laura. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Hubbard, Ruth. 1988. Some thoughts about the masculinity of the natural sciences. Ii Feminist thought and the structure of knowledge, ed. Gergen, Mary McCanney. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Infertility Medical Centre Pty Ltd. n.d. The Infertility Medical Centre IVF handbook. Melbourne, Australia .Google Scholar
Klein, Renate. 1989. Exploitation of a desire: Womens experiences with in vitro fertilization. Geelong Australia: Women's Studies Summer Institute, Deakin University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, Renate, and Raymond, Janice, and Dumble, Lynette. 1991. RU 486: Misconceptions, myths and morals. Melbourne, Australia: Spinifex Press.Google Scholar
Law Reform Commission of Victoria. 1989a. Informed decisions about medical procedures. Report 24.Google Scholar
Law Reform Commission of Victoria. 1989b. Informed decisions about medical procedures: Doctor and patient studies.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen. 1989. Can there be a feminist science? Ii Women, knowledge and reality: Explorations in feminist philosophy, ed. Garry, Ann and Pearsall, Marilyn. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Macintosh, David. 1994. Deceiving our patients. Monash Bioethics Review 13(3): 20–23.Google Scholar
McCaughey, Martha. 1993. Redirecting feminist critiques of science. Hypatia 8(4): 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monash IVF Pty. Ltd., Epworth Program. 1996. Monash IVF patient handbook. Melbourne, Australia.Google Scholar
Moore, Rosemary. 1994. Is the abortion pill on its way? The Age, 13 May, 10.Google Scholar
Rowland, Robyn. 1992. Living laboratories: Women and reproductive technologies. Syndey Australia: Sun.Google Scholar
Ryan, Denise. 1993. IVF: No pain no gain. The Sunday Age, 20 June, 17.Google Scholar
Vines, Gail. 1995. Is there a database in the house? New Scientist, 21 January, 34–35.Google Scholar
Wallace, Megan. 1991. Health care and the law. A guide for nurses. Sydney: The Law Book Company.Google Scholar