Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:07:42.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Response to Friedman and Brison

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Nancy J. Hirschmann
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Here, Hirschmann responds to Marilyn Friedman and Susan]. Brison's comments on The Subject of Liberty: Toward a Feminist Theory of Freedom. She clarifies some aspects of her social construction argument, articulates the role of discourse and its relation to material reality, and explicates the potentially paradoxical case of support for women's choices when those choices produce harm.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , Fall 2006 , pp. 201 - 211
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Collins, Patricia Hill. 1998. Fighting words: Black women and the search for justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 1992. Rethinking obligation: A feminist method for political theory. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Nancy J. 1997. Feminist standpoint as postmodern strategy. Women and Politics 18 (3): 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1975. An essay concerning human understanding. Ed. Peter, H. Nidditch New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1987. Not a moral issue. In Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1984. The Marx‐Engeis reader, 2d ed. Ed. Tucker, Robert C.New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
O'Brien, Mary. 1981. The politics of reproduction. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The sexual contract. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. 1794. Vindication of the rights of woman: With strictures on political and moral subjects. Philadelphia: Printed for Matthew Carey. Early American Imprints, First Series, no. 28122.Google Scholar