Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:39:05.956Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Questioning Feminine Connection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 March 2020

Morgan E. Forbes
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines Nancy Chodorow's theory of feminine connection and masculine separation in The Reproduction of Mothering. First it demonstrates that, contrary to many feminists’ interpretations, Chodorow's theory does not portray masculine separation as a social problem to which feminine connection is the solution. Then it shows that Chodorow's apparently intended theory is incoherent. Finally, it argues that Chodorow's claims imply another theory that is coherent and that deserves feminists’ attention.

Type
Research Article
Information
Hypatia , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , Spring 1997 , pp. 140 - 151
Copyright
Copyright © 1997 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balint, Michael. 1937. Early developmental states of the ego: Primary object‐love. Ii Primary love and psychoanalytic technique. See Balint 1965.Google Scholar
Balint, Michael. 1951. On love and hate. Ii Primary love and psychoanalytic technique. See Balint 1965.Google Scholar
Balint, Michael. 1965. Primary love and psychoanalytic technique. New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
Belenky, Mary Field, Clinchy, Blythe McVicker, Goldberger, Nancy Rule, and Tarule, Jill Mattuck. 1986. Women's ways of knowing: The development of self, voice, and mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Buckley, Peter, ed. 1986. Essential papers on object relations. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Chodorow, Nancy. 1978. The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1977. In a different voice: Women's conceptions of self and morality. Harvard Education Review 47: 481–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a different voice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, Carol. 1995. Hearing the difference: Theorizing connection. Hypatia 10(2): 120–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horney, Karen. 1932. The dread of women: Observations on a specific difference in the dread felt by men and by women respectively for the opposite sex. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 13: 348–60.Google Scholar
Jordan, Judith V., Kaplan, Alexandra G., Miller, Jean Baker, Stiver, Irene P. and Surrey, Janet L. 1991. Women's growth in connection. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Mahler, Margaret. 1958. On the first three subphases of the separation‐individuation process. Ii Essential papers on object relations. See Buckley 1986.Google Scholar
McClelland, David C. 1975. Power: The inner experience. New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Miller, Jean Baker. 1976. Toward a new psychology of women. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Plant, Judith, ed. 1989. Healing the wounds: The promise of ecofeminism. Toronto: Between the Lines.Google Scholar
Sjöö, Monica and Mor, Barbara. 1991. The great cosmic mother: Rediscovering the religion of the earth. San Francisco: Harper Collins.Google Scholar