Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T05:09:22.631Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Disability as Abject: Kristeva, Disability, and Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Josh Dohmen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this essay, I develop an account of disability exclusion that, though inspired by Julia Kristeva, diverges from her account in several important ways. I first offer a brief interpretation of Kristeva's essays “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity and … Vulnerability” and “A Tragedy and a Dream: Disability Revisited” and, using this interpretation, I assess certain criticisms of Kristeva's position made by Jan Grue in his “Rhetorics of Difference: Julia Kristeva and Disability.” I then argue that Kristeva's concept of abjection, especially as developed by Sara Ahmed and Tina Chanter, offers important insights into disability oppression; Ahmed's and Chanter's contributions improve upon Kristeva's account. Understanding disability as abject helps to explain both resistances to interacting with disabled others and ways to resist disability oppression. Finally, I argue that understanding disability as abject is preferable to recent deployments of Lacanian theory in disability studies and that this account is compatible with social models of disability.

Type
Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 31 , Issue 4 , Fall 2016 , pp. 762 - 778
Copyright
Copyright © 2016 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ahmed, Sara. 2005. The skin of the community: Affect and boundary formation. In Revolt, affect, collectivity: The unstable boundaries of Kristeva's polis, ed. Chanter, Tina and Płonowska Ziarek, Ewa. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Beardsworth, Sara. 2004. Julia Kristeva: Psychoanalysis and modernity. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Chanter, Tina. 2008. The picture of abjection: Film, fetish, and the nature of difference. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeArmitt, Pleshette. 2014. The right to narcissism: A case for an im‐possible self‐love. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. 1957. The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, ed. Strachey, James. Vol. 14. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
Goodley, Dan. 2011. Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.Google Scholar
Grue, Jan. 2012. Rhetorics of difference: Julia Kristeva and disability. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research 15 (1): 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafer, Alison. 2013. Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of horror. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1987. Tales of love. Trans. Leon S. Roudiez. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 2009. A meditation, a political act, an art of living. Trans. S. K. Keltner. In Psychoanalysis, aesthetics, and politics in the work of Julia Kristeva, ed. Oliver, Kelly and Keltner, S. K.Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 2012. Liberty, equality, fraternity and … vulnerability. In Hatred and forgiveness. Trans. Jeanine Herman. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 2013. A tragedy and a dream: Disability revisited. Irish Theological Quarterly 78 (3): 219–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. 2006. Écrits. Trans. Bruce Fink, Héloïse Fink, and Russell Grigg. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Laplanche, Jean, and Pontalis, J. B. 1973. The language of psycho‐analysis, ed. Masud, M. and Khan, R. Trans. Donald Nicholson‐Smith. London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho‐Analysis.Google Scholar
Oliver, Kelly. 2005. Revolt and forgiveness. In Revolt, affect, collectivity: The unstable boundaries of Kristeva's polis, ed. Chanter, Tina and Płonowska Ziarek, Ewa. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael. 2009. Understanding disability: From theory to practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, Tom. 2013. The social model of disability. In The disability studies reader, ed. Davis, Lennard J.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Shildrick, Margrit. 2002. Embodying the monster: Encounters with the vulnerable self. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE.Google Scholar
Shildrick, Margrit. 2009. Dangerous discourses of disability, subjectivity, and sexuality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siebers, Tobin. 2008. Disability theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremain, Shelley. 2005. Foucault, governmentality, and critical disability theory: An introduction. In Foucault and the government of disability, ed. Tremain, Shelley. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Weingrad, Michael. 1996. Jews (in theory): Representations of Judaism, anti‐Semitism, and the Holocaust in postmodern French thought. Judaism 45 (1): 79–98.Google Scholar