1 Burns, Tom R. and Flam, Helena The Shaping of Social Organization: Social Rule System Theory with Applications (London, 1987).Google Scholar

2 Tropea, Joseph L. “Bureaucratic Order and Special Children: Urban Schools, 1890s–1940s,“ History of Education Quarterly (Spring 1987): 29–53.Google Scholar

3 Ibid.Google Scholar

4 Leslie, Gerald R. The Family in Social Context (New York, 1967), 586, 602; Paul, H. and Glasser, Lois N. eds., Families in Crisis (New York, 1970), 35; “Teacher-Opinion Poll,” National Education Association Journal 53 (Sept. 1964): 25; “Major Problems of Teachers,” National Education Association Research Bulletin 49 (Dec. 1971): 105; Harrison, Bennet “Education and Underemployment in the Urban Ghetto,” in Problems in Political Economy: An Urban Perspective, ed. Gordon, David M. (Lexington, Mass., 1971), 185; United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Middle Atlantic Regional Office, The Working Age Population: Initial Findings (New York, 1969), 2.Google Scholar

5 Vredevoe, Lawrence E. “School Discipline, Third Report on a Study of Students and School Discipline in the United States and Other Countries,“ National Association of Secondary-School Principals Bulletin 49 (Mar. 1965): 215–26, 218.Google Scholar

6 Philadelphia School Report (Philadelphia, 1909), 58.Google Scholar

7 “Teacher Opinion on Pupil Behavior, 1955–56,” National Education Association Research Bulletin 34 (Apr. 1956).Google Scholar

8 Kvaraceus, William C. “The Urban Schools and Juvenile Delinquency,“ in Social Maladjustment: Behavior Change and Education, Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Invitational Conference on Urban Education (New York, 1966), 60.Google Scholar

9 Baltimore Board of School Commissioners Annual Report (Baltimore, 1934); Public Schools of the District of Columbia, Pupil Personnel Services Annual Report, 1967–68, forward.Google Scholar

10 In many school systems the use of these procedures was consonant with professional and administrative goals; for example, see data reported in White, Mary Alice and Charry, June eds., School Disorder, Intelligence, and Social Class (New York, 1966).Google Scholar

11 Hobson v. Hansen, 269 F. Supp. 401 D.C.D.C. (1967).Google Scholar

12 Behavioral Systems Research Group, Program in Policy Studies in Science and Technology, George Washington University, “The Development and Implementation of a Behavioral/Systems Approach for the Prevention and Control of Delinquency and Crime,” Third Report (submitted to National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice [Grant No. NI-023], Nov. 1970), 25.Google Scholar

13 Pupil Personnel Services, 1962–63, 8.Google Scholar

14 Ibid., 1965–66.Google Scholar

15 Memorandum, “Factors That Influence the Length of Time a Pupil Remains on Suspension,“ Division of Special Services, Baltimore City Public Schools, 1968.Google Scholar

16 Interview with author. This teacher had been assigned to a social adjustment class, a class of behavioral problems. She had requested an evaluation of a thirteen-year-old girl, innocently seeking professional help because she had heard this girl was involved with a group of shoplifters. The immediate and unintended consequence of this request was an administrative suspension.Google Scholar

17 Denton, Herbert H. “Forty Eliot Teachers Walk Out,“ Washington Post, 9 May 1969; and “Teacher Walkout Grows,” ibid., 10 May 1969; Pupil Personnel Services, 1967–68, 24; “The Development and Implementation of a Behavioral/Systems Approach for the Prevention and Control of Delinquency and Crime,” Second Report, Dec. 1969, 20.Google Scholar

18 “Informally Suspended Students,” Baltimore City Public Schools Circular No. 244, Series 1968–69 (27 Mar. 1969).Google Scholar

19 Tropea, Joseph L. “Family, Productive Organization, Formal Authority, and the Generation of Deviant Youth: Toward a Social Structural Theory of Social Control and Socialization“ (Ph.D. diss., George Washington University, 1973), 235.Google Scholar

20 Baltimore Schools Circular, No. 245, Series 1968–69 (1 Apr. 1969) and No. 89, Series 1969–70 (15 Oct. 1969); Pupil Personnel Services, 1963, “The Development and Implementation of a Behavioral/Systems Approach for the Prevention and Control of Delinquency and Crime,” Second Report, Dec. 1969, 12.Google Scholar

21 Children's Defense Fund, School Suspensions: Are They Helping Children? (Washington, D.C., 1975); Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 95 D. Ct. 729 (1975). Goss v. Lopez established hearing procedures for public school discipline cases.Google Scholar

22 D.C. Code Ann., paragraphs 31–37 (1967).Google Scholar

23 Tropea, “Family, Productive Organization, Formal Authority, and the Generation of Deviant Youth,“ 243.Google Scholar

24 Ibid., 244.Google Scholar

25 Ibid., 249.Google Scholar

26 Pupil Personnel Services, 1965–66, 1967–68.Google Scholar

27 U.S. Congress, Senate, Hearings before the Public Health and Education, Welfare, and Safety Subcommittee of the Committee on the District of Columbia, Crime in the National Capital, Part 5 (Washington, D.C., 1969), 1645.Google Scholar

28 Ibid., 1573–81; “The Development and Implementation of a Behavioral/Systems Approach for the Prevention and Control of Delinquency and Crime,” Second Report, Dec. 1969, 32–34.Google Scholar

29 “The Development and Implementation of a Behavioral/Systems Approach for the Prevention and Control of Delinquency and Crime,” Second Report, Dec. 1969, 43; Baltimore Schools Circulars No. 245, Series 1969–70 and No. 89, Series 1969–70; Kistler, Robert “Campaign on Truancy Cuts Crime,” Washington Post, 13 Feb. 1971.Google Scholar

30 Kistler, “Campaign on Truancy Cuts Crime.”Google Scholar

31 Milius, Peter “Police, Security Aides Patrol Many U.S. City Schools,“ Washington Post, 10 Jan. 1970.Google Scholar

32 “Study Cites Surge in School Violence,” Washington Post, 13 Jan. 1970.Google Scholar