Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T05:22:44.606Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Michael Quante, Hegels Begriff der Handlung, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstaat: Frommann-Holzboog, 1993, pp 262, DM110

Review products

Michael Quante, Hegels Begriff der Handlung, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstaat: Frommann-Holzboog, 1993, pp 262, DM110

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2015

Gordon Finlayson*
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © The Hegel Society of Great Britain 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Cf Wood's, Alun, Hegel's Ethical Thought, pp 48 Google Scholar. Wood thinks that Hegel's Logic is “humbug”, yet thinks that Hegel's ethical thought still has much to offer contemporary moral theory. Thus his interpretation of Hegel's Philosophy of Right ignores Hegel's explicit self-understanding, and unfolds his position with respect to the object of explanation alone. It is worth pointing out that it is a testament to the richness, if not to the internal coherence, of Hegel's Logic, that it provides him with the conceptual resources with which to articulate positions on juridical and ethical matters which retain their pertinence to this day.

2 Quante does not mention Riehl's article, presumably, because the Aesthetics lies outside the purview of his study. Given the paucity of material on this subject, I still find this a curious omission.