Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:09:34.005Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Studies of the Gospel of Mark

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 November 2011

Carl S. Patton
Carl S. Patton
Affiliation:
Columbus, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The current essays to disentangle the literary history of the material which now forms our Gospel of Mark were described in an article by Professor Moulton in a recent number of this Review. Of the attempts to solve the problem there mentioned two seem plausible enough to warrant fuller exposition in these pages. They are the reconstructions by which Professor Hermann von Soden, of Berlin, and Professor Emil Wendling, of Zabern, have tried to resolve our Gospel into its constituent elements.

Type
Research Article
Information
Harvard Theological Review , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , April 1913 , pp. 229 - 239
Copyright
Copyright © President and Fellows of Harvard College 1913

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “The Relation of the Gospel of Mark to Primitive Christian Tradition,” Harvard Theological Review, III (1910), 403–436.

2 Die wichtigsten Fragen im Leben Jesu. 1904.

3 Urmarcus. 1905. See also Die Entstehung des Marcusevangeliums. 1908.

4 For reasons which he does not explain he somewhat rearranges the sections.

5 Note especially the words μυστήριον, μετὰ χαρᾱς λαμβάνειν, διωγμός, ἐπιθυμίαι, καρποϕορεῑν, and see Wendling, Urmarcus, p. 35, note 11.

6 Cf. 2 19b, 20, also the work of Ev.

7 Cf. 5 2 with 1 23; 5 6, 7 with 1 24; 5 8–13 with 1 25; 5 13 with 1 26; 5 14–17 with 1 27. and see Wendling, Urmarcus, p. 11.

8 In the Entstehung des Marcus-Evangeliums (p. 204) Wendling arranges the verses from M1 in chapters 13 and 14 as follows: 13 1–2, 33, 28–29, 34–36, 14 1–2, 10–11, 3–7, 22–25, 43–46, 48–50, 65. Some minor differences in the analysis, affecting words or clauses, are registered ibid., p. 237.

9 Not including parables, where the present is not historical.