Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T00:24:53.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Final -E In Lewis and Short

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2009

O. A. W. Dilke
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Lewis and Short's Latin Dictionary, published in 1879 and often reprinted, is still invaluable for university and upper-school work. Users of it may have noticed that the final syllable of certain words ending in -e is wrongly marked long; but most are probably unaware of the extent of this error. The following list gives all words which the present writer has discovered with this incorrect ē (bis after an adverb indicates an entry under the adverb and under the adjective connected with it).

Type
Research Article
Information
Greece & Rome , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , October 1959 , pp. 212 - 213
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 And first syllable long, as hūc, illūc, etc., though Lewis and Short do not mark them.

2 This and the following word would perhaps be better marked with instead of ō.

3 The adjective supernus is later than this adverb.

4 In origin instrumental ablative of an obsolete noun temus.

5 And the second syllable can be short, Cat. lxiii. 46.

6 But quoque exists (apart from qua + -que) only in the phrase usque quoque, since ‘Manil. 5,313’ refers really to v. 318, where quaque a discarded conjecture.