Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:54:59.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Poor sleep quality and its associated factors among working adults during COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2024

Lwin Mie Aye*
Affiliation:
Public Health and Community Medicine Department, School of Medicine, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia South East Asia Community Observatory (SEACO) and Global Public Health, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Science, Monash University, Selangor, Malaysia
Wei Hao Lee
Affiliation:
School of Medicine, International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia School of Medicine, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
*
Corresponding author: Lwin Mie Aye; Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

In Malaysia, a nationwide movement control order (MCO), implemented to curb the COVID-19 spread, impacted on the lives of the working population which could impair sleep quality.

Objective

This study aims to find the sleep quality status and its association with the socioeconomic, employment and lifestyle factors of working adults during the MCO period.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted among 500 eligible working adults. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire consisting of the Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index.

Results

The proportion of poor sleep quality is found to be 59.4%. Analysis shows that the use of electronic devices before sleep (OR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.02–5.35, p-value = 0.046), increased amount of workload (OR = 0.45, p-value = 0.005), decreased in amount of workload (OR = 0.48, p-value = 0.003) and distracted while working (OR = 0.57, p-value = 0.014) are the factors significantly associated with and are predictors of poor sleep quality.

Conclusion

During crisis, there is a need for public health interventions for the working population to adopt a healthy lifestyle. Employers are recommended to support employees’ well-being and to provide a healthy workplace during challenging times. Policy recommendations are also made to implement flexible working arrangements, workload management, workplace mental health support and legal protections on reasonable working hours, rest breaks and time off during crises.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Impact statement

Movement control order (MCO), implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic, results in job instability in Malaysia where many businesses and companies struggling to function and many economic sectors facing revenue losses. Factors ranging from fear of infection to monetary loss among the working population have led to a significant impact on mental health, giving rise to poor sleep quality. Studies have been done to explore the sleep quality among healthcare workers and university students, and the results were poor. This has yet to be explored among the general working population. During MCO, the majority of the working adults had to work from home and struggle between family and work. This compromises their normal routines that have impacts on their food intake and lifestyle. As a result, the sleep quality of the working population could be impaired. In this study, it was found that the proportion of poor sleep quality among the working population is found to be high. The results show that getting more sedentary, use of electronic devices before sleep, changes in the amount of workload, and being distracted while working during the MCO are the factors that are associated with poor sleep quality among the working population in Malaysia. The findings highlight that during the period of crisis, there are need for public health interventions to empower the working population to adopt a healthy lifestyle, achieve the required level of physical activities and provide sleep hygiene education. The findings provide employers with the evidence to provide measures to support employees’ well-being during challenging times.

Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic started in the year 2019 and has quickly become a global health emergency. The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and consequent lockdowns worldwide have been well observed over the months, and Malaysia, just like other countries, entered a nationwide movement control order (MCO) to curb the spread of viral infection (Aziz et al., Reference Aziz, Othman, Lugova and Suleiman2020; Law, Reference Law2020). This results in job instability in Malaysia, where many businesses and companies struggling to function and many economic sectors facing revenue losses (Chopra et al., Reference Chopra, Ranjan, Singh, Kumar, Arora, Hasan, Kasiraj, Suryansh, Vikram, Malhotra, Kumari, Klanidhi and Baitha2020; Lai et al., Reference Lai, Abidin, Hasni, Karim and Ishak2020). A survey published in December 2020 by the World Bank Group stated that a large revenue drop of 25% was observed for Malaysia during MCO (Kuriakose and Tran, Reference Kuriakose and Tran2020). Factors ranging from fear of infection to monetary loss among the working population have led to a significant impact on mental health, giving rise to stress, anxiety and distress (Lai et al., Reference Lai, Ma, Wang, Cai, Hu, Wei, Wu, Du, Chen, Li, Tan, Kang, Yao, Huang, Wang, Wang, Liu and Hu2020; Rossell et al., Reference Rossell, Neill, Phillipou, Tan, Toh, Van Rheenen and Meyer2021). Moreover, because of MCO, the majority of the working adults had to work from home, struggle between family and work and compromise their normal routines, which had impacts on their food intake and lifestyle (Chopra et al., Reference Chopra, Ranjan, Singh, Kumar, Arora, Hasan, Kasiraj, Suryansh, Vikram, Malhotra, Kumari, Klanidhi and Baitha2020). As a result, the sleep quality of the working population could be further impaired (Garg et al., Reference Garg, Goel and D Gupta2020; Gualano et al., Reference Gualano, Lo Moro, Voglino, Bert and Siliquini2020; Yang et al., Reference Yang, Zhu, Yang, Lin, Chen, Zhao and Fu2020).

Sleep quality is defined as one’s satisfaction with sleep experience, sufficient sleep quantity, uninterrupted sleep and the feeling of rest and restoration upon awakening (Kline, Reference Kline, Gellman and Turner2013). The subjective sleep quality can be measured by self-reported methods that use tools such as the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI; Buysse et al., Reference Buysse, Reynolds, Monk, Berman and Kupfer1989). The relevance and crucial role of good sleep quality among working adults becomes clearer in both the short and long terms (Chattu et al., Reference Chattu, Manzar, Kumary, Burman, Spence and Pandi-Perumal2018). As short-term consequences, the loss of sleep quality could lead to a loss in productivity, road or work-related accidents, absenteeism, negative mood, impaired cognitive function and income loss (Rosekind et al., Reference Rosekind, Gregory, Mallis, Brandt, Seal and Lerner2010). In contrast, the long-term effects of it are associated with increased risk and development of chronic noncommunicable diseases such as cardiovascular, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and mental illness.

During the lockdown period of the COVID-19 pandemic, many studies have been conducted by researchers worldwide to measure the sleep quality of different populations (Tasnim et al., Reference Tasnim, Rahman, Pawar, Chi, Yu, Zou, Sultana, McKyer, Ma and Hossain2020). A study by Žilinskas et al. (Reference Žilinskas, Puteikis and Mameniškienė2022) found that 43% of white-collar workers had poor sleep quality during the lockdown period, 68.9% of participants from general population had poor sleep quality in the study done in United Kingdom (Kantor et al., Reference Kantor, Kantor, Fortgang and Pace-Schott2022), 14.9% of the employees who returned to work in China after the lockdown (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Zhu, Yang, Lin, Chen, Zhao and Fu2020) had poor sleep quality during the initial period of pandemic and as high as 78.8% among healthcare workers from Kuwait in a study done by Abbas et al. (Reference Abbas, Al-Otaibi, Gheith, Nagib, Farid and Walaa2021). Studies exploring sleep quality in Malaysia have focused on university students and healthcare workers (Hazizul Hasan and AE Moustafa, Reference Hazizul Hasan and AE Moustafa2022), whereas others have elaborated extensively on the psychological impacts of the pandemic on the working population (Abdul Latif et al., Reference Abdul Latif, Mohamed Ismail, Loh, Nur Azurah, Midin, Shah and Kalok2022). This gap in the literature has yet to be explored in the context of the working population in Malaysia. The factors affecting sleep may differ between healthcare workers and the general working population as well. While healthcare workers’ concern tends more toward fear of contracting infection and isolation from family (Troisi et al., Reference Troisi, Nanni, Riconi, Carola and Di Cave2021), ordinary workers may lose sleep over job instability, impact on income, finances and lifestyle (Martínez-de-Quel et al., Reference Martínez-de-Quel, Suárez-Iglesias, López-Flores and Pérez2021) because of changes in working arrangements during the MCO period. Exposure to such stressors may contribute to triggering anxiety, negatively impacting sleep quality (Alwhaibi and Al Aloola, Reference Alwhaibi and Al Aloola2023). Moreover, the literature also states that the sleep quality of the working population can be influenced by socioeconomics (Anders et al., Reference Anders, Breckenkamp, Blettner, Schlehofer and Berg-Beckhoff2014), occupational (Marzo et al., Reference Marzo, Shekhawat, Chauhan, Patel, Kyaw, Amran, Mat, Rajendiran, Noor, Acharya and Shrestha2021) and lifestyle factors (Madrid-Valero et al., Reference Madrid-Valero, Martínez-Selva, Couto, Sánchez-Romera and Ordoñana2017; Touyz et al., Reference Touyz, Lacey and Hay2020; Jeong et al., Reference Jeong, Jang, Kim, Kim, Park and Jang2021; Micheletti Cremasco et al., Reference Micheletti Cremasco, Mulasso, Moroni, Testa, Degan, Rainoldi and Rabaglietti2021; Robillard et al., Reference Robillard, Dion, Pennestri, Solomonova, Lee, Saad, Murkar, Godbout, Edwards, Quilty, Daros, Bhatla and Kendzerska2021).

In times of crisis, widespread disruption to the sleep quality of working adults can have detrimental effects not only on individuals’ personal and family lives but also on work, productivity and society as a whole. As such, it is important to understand the sleep quality status and characteristics associated with poor sleep quality of working people with affected sleep quality as the well-being of this population is critical in regaining momentum in the economy in times of crisis. Investing in this is essential for developing targeted interventions and will enable relevant stakeholders to work collaboratively to implement strategies that mitigate the impact of the crisis on sleep quality, thus fostering the well-being of the Malaysian workforce. This study aims to explore whether socioeconomic, occupational and lifestyle factors are related to the sleep quality of working adults in Malaysia. Resource allocation for public health interventions for the well-being and disease prevention of the target population can be done based on the findings from this research.

This study aims to explore whether socioeconomic, occupational and lifestyle factors are related to the sleep quality of working adults in Malaysia. Resource allocation for public health interventions for the well-being and disease prevention of the target population can be done based on the findings from this research.

Materials and methods

Study setting and study population

Study was conducted in January 2021 among working adults in Malaysia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Working adults consisted of those who were employed in any sectors or self-employed, or conducted their own business. The participants’ ages ranged from 18 to 65 years old were included. Those with existing medical conditions, such as long-standing illness and sleep disorders, and those with mental health disorders, part-time workers and shift workers were excluded from the study.

Study design and procedure

A cross-sectional study using an online survey purposive sampling was conducted by researchers from a medical university for 2 weeks in January 2021 to recruit eligible participants across Malaysia into the study. The sample size was calculated using the Raosoft online calculator, for the estimated large population size of 20,000 and above, a margin of error 5% and confidence interval of 95%. The final sample size was calculated to be 500 after a 35% nonresponse rate was added. The online survey was carried out by sending the Google survey link through Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, which brought the participants to the online questionnaire. Since it was during COVID-19 pandemic, the researchers approached the potential eligible participant via these platforms. Study information, which was also stated in the online questionnaire, was explained before obtaining consent on the online form. The questionnaire was pilot tested prior to actual data collection to test the clarity and appropriateness.

Study instruments

A structured questionnaire composed of four sessions was used to collect the data. Section (A) includes the question items to measure the sociodemographic variables, section (B) measures the lifestyle factors affected during the COVID-19 pandemic and section (C) measures the changes that took place in occupational factors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Section D consists of the tool to measure sleep quality, which is the PSQI. Independent variables were measured in sections A, B and C, whereas section D measured the outcome, sleep quality. PSQI is a self-rated questionnaire examining sleep quality and disturbances of the participants over a month period. Nineteen items generate seven-part scores: sleep latency, duration and disturbances, subjective sleep quality, habitual sleep efficiency, daytime dysfunction and use of sleep medication (Buysse et al., Reference Buysse, Reynolds, Monk, Berman and Kupfer1989). The tool has a sensitivity of 89.6% and a specificity of 86.5% in differentiating bad and good sleepers. A global PSQI score ranges from 0 to 21. The total PSQI of 5 or more is suggestive of poor sleep (Buysse et al., Reference Buysse, Reynolds, Monk, Berman and Kupfer1989)

Data analysis plan

The data collected are tabulated and analyzed by using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 26.0. Characteristics of the participants are described by using descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation and minimum/maximum for numerical variables and frequency and proportion for categorical variables. The association between the independent variables and the dependent variable is tested by using the chi-square test. Multiple logistic regression analysis is subsequently performed to study the independent effect of variables over the outcome. A p value less than 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.

Results

Characteristics of the respondents

Most of the participants in this study were females 331; 66.2 %). The mean age of the participants is 37.5 years (SD = 12.2, min–max = 18–64). In terms of ethnicity, the majority of the respondents who responded to the survey were Chinese (68.6%), followed by Indian (16.6%), Malay (11.4%) and others (3.4%). About half of them were married (51%) and (35.2%) were single, (12.6%) responded as they were in a relationship and (1.0%) reported as divorced (Table 1). The average number of people the respondents supported is 1.7 people (SD = 1.8, min–max = 0–9) (Table 2).

Table 1. Characteristics of the respondents

Table 2. Description of numerical variables

With regards to socioeconomic characteristics, almost half of them (49.0%) are from the B40 category. 38% of the respondents stated they spent less during MCO; and the majority (68.8%) responded as no change in income. Looking at the lifestyle factors, there was a small proportion of respondents (9%) who had reduced their eating habits but half of them (52.8%) stated no change. 21.2% and 30.2% of participants expressed getting more sedentary and slightly sedentary respectively during MCO. The majority of them (93%) agreed that they used the electronic devices before sleep. For the caffeine intake, a minority (16.6%) reported increased intake, while a small proportion of respondents, 3.8% and 4.8%, said increase in smoking and alcohol consumption during MCO. With regard to occupational factors, during the time of MCO, 35.2% solely worked from home, while 39% had to work both from home and the office. A clear majority of them (71.6%) said their work routine had changed. More than half (57.4%) said they were distracted with household matters while working during the MCO period. Then, 12.2% and 33.8% reported an increase in workload drastically and increased workload, respectively, and 43.6% reported they were worried about their job security at the same time.

Figure 1 shows that the participants responded to the questionnaire were from 13 different states of Malaysia. Higher numbers of respondents from Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Malacca, Penang, Johor, Negeri Sembilan, Sarawak, Perak and Terengganu are found to have poorer sleep quality compared to those from other states.

Figure 1. Geographical distribution of respondents with poor sleep quality.

Sleep quality of the study population

The results show that most of the respondents (59.4%) have poor sleep quality (Table 1). The mean PSQI score of the participants is calculated to be 5.6 (SD = ±2.9, min–max = 0–16) (Table 2).

Chi-square analysis is performed to test the association of socioeconomic, lifestyle and occupational factors with poor sleep quality in comparison to those who had good sleep quality. The results presented in Table 3 show that changes in spending habit during MCO (p-value = 0.003), changes in eating habits (p-value = 0.003), changes in physical activity (p-value = 0.001), use of electronic devices before sleep (p-value = 0.002), increased in smoking (p-value = 0.014), changes in workload (p-value = 0.001), distractions while working (p-value = 0.001) and worries about job security (p-value = 0.013) during COVID-19 pandemic are found to be significantly associated with poor sleep quality. The percentages of changes that took place in socioeconomic, lifestyle and occupational categories are also higher in those who had poor sleep quality.

Table 3. Socioeconomic, lifestyle and occupational factors associated with sleep quality among the working adult population

* Here, p-value of <0.05 was considered as significant.

Fisher’s exact test, B40 = below 40%, M40 = middle 40%, T20 = top 20% of the income status in Malaysia.

Table 4 summarizes the predictor factors associated with poor sleep quality among the participants. A total of 10 variables that had a p-value of less than 0.25 were selected from the chi-square analysis to conduct the multiple logistic regression analysis. After logistic regression analysis was performed, it was identified that the participants who used electronic devices before sleep (OR = 2.33, 95% CI = 1.02–5.35, p-value = 0.046), those who had increased amount of workload (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.26–0.79, p-value = 0.005), those who had decreased amount of workload (OR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.29–0.78, p-value = 0.003), and the participants who were distracted with family matters while working (OR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.37–0.89, p-value = 0.014) were found to predict poor sleep quality during the COVID-19 pandemic in our study population.

Table 4. Multiple logistic regression analysis of poor sleep quality among the working adult population

* Here, p-value of <0.05 was considered as significant.

Discussion

Prevalence

The prevalence of poor sleep quality among the working adults during the MCO period of COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia is 59.4%, which is found to be high. The high prevalence was also seen in the studies done by Abbas et al. (Reference Abbas, Al-Otaibi, Gheith, Nagib, Farid and Walaa2021), Kantor et al. (Reference Kantor, Kantor, Fortgang and Pace-Schott2022) and Žilinskas et al. (Reference Žilinskas, Puteikis and Mameniškienė2022), which are 78.8%, 68.9% and 43%, respectively. However, in a study from China by Yang et al. (Reference Yang, Zhu, Yang, Lin, Chen, Zhao and Fu2020), the prevalence was lower, 14.9%. The higher proportion found in this study may be explained by the condition where the people are bound to stay indoors during a crisis like COVID-19 pandemic. Sociodemographic factors also explain the findings since majority of the participants were females and were married which was found to be normally associated with poorer sleep quality (Madrid-Valero et al., Reference Madrid-Valero, Martínez-Selva, Couto, Sánchez-Romera and Ordoñana2017)

Another reason could be the stressful situation, which was not measured in this study, that working adults went through due to the sudden and unexpected changes in socioeconomic, lifestyle and working arrangements that took place in the majority of the participants of this study. The high prevalence of poor sleep quality could also be due to selection bias as most of the participants recruited into the study were from Selangor and Kuala Lumpur, the two states where the working populations are highest and also the states that were worse hit by COVID-19 (Hashim et al., Reference Hashim, Adman, Hashim, Mohd Radi and Kwan2021) during the pandemic.

Factors associated with poor sleep quality among working adults during COVID-19 pandemic

Socioeconomic factors

The results from this study say that during the MCO period, the employees whose spending habit has increased is significantly associated with poor sleep quality in the initial chi-square analysis. However, it is no longer significant in the regression analysis. Even though, the results are not significant for the socioeconomic factors in this study, socioeconomic factors indeed have proven to impact sleep quality. Changes in spending habits such as spending more may impose a financial strain on the individual (Abdul Latif et al., Reference Abdul Latif, Mohamed Ismail, Loh, Nur Azurah, Midin, Shah and Kalok2022). Government financial support packages and wage subsidy programs implemented as part of the aid and relief efforts for the COVID-19 pandemic (Wage Subsidy Program, 2021) might have absorbed the initial financial strain among the employees which explained the insignificant results under socioeconomic factors.

Lifestyle factors

The findings also indicate that lifestyle factors have effects on the PSQI score. In the initial chi-square analysis, employees who increased in eating habit, got more sedentary, used electronic devices before sleep, increased in caffeine intake and smoking were found to be significantly associated with poor sleep quality. However, after the multiple logistic regression analyses, only one variable, the use of electronic devices before sleep, shows significant associations with poor sleep quality. It is also a well-studied fact that using electronic devices before causes a delay in melatonin secretion and disrupts sleep (Randjelović et al., Reference Randjelović, Stojiljković, Radulović, Ilić, Stojanović and Ilić2019; Boukhris et al., Reference Boukhris, Jahrami, Trabelsi, Glenn, Bragazzi, BaHammam, Pandi-Perumal and Jahrami2023). The increased use of electronic devices in the time of MCO must have contributed to this process putting people at risk of poor sleep quality.

Occupational factors

Besides that, occupational factors such as changes in workload and getting distracted while working had an impact on one’s sleep quality. According to research (Conroy et al., Reference Conroy, Hadler, Cho, Moreira, MacKenzie, Swanson, Burgess, Arnedt and Goldstein2021), since the working adults were restrained at home during the pandemic, this inevitably disrupted their usual daily routine being disrupted, making them more prone to the various distractions at home from various sources thereby affecting their work. This might result in putting one at risk of getting more stressed and feeling overwhelmed by the escalating amount of workload that is left undone which in turn causing the poor sleep quality.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that the proportion of poor sleep quality among working adults is high during the MCO period in Malaysia. The socioeconomic factors are not associated with poor sleep quality among the participants. The variables such as the use of electronic devices before sleep, changes in the amount of workload and being distracted while working during the MCO period of the COVID-19 pandemic have caused them to be significantly associated with poor sleep quality, predicting this outcome among the working population in Malaysia.

Recommendation

The results highlight that during the period of crisis like COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need for public health interventions that aim to empower the working population to adopt a healthy lifestyle, particularly sleep hygiene education on the use of electronic devices before sleep to improve sleep quality. The findings also provide employers with the evidence to implement additional measures to support employees’ well-being and to provide a healthy workplace during the challenging times. Policy recommendations are also made to implement flexible working arrangements, workload management, workplace mental health support and legal protections for reasonable working hours, rest breaks and time off during crises. Post-pandemic studies on sleep quality and its impact on the physical and mental health of the working population are recommended to explore the health needs of the working population.

Limitations

Probability sampling methods could not be deployed in this study, which might impact its generalizability even though the study covered all states in Malaysia. The independent variables are measured subjectively, such as changes in lifestyle factors and occupational factors; hence, the accuracy of the level of changes might be affected. The study included more females who are more vulnerable to poor sleep quality than men, and potential selection bias during the recruitment process, contributing to high proportion of poor sleep quality in this study. The accuracy of the results can also be affected by recall bias, which is a systematic error that occurs when participants do not remember the previous experience accurately.

Open peer review

To view the open peer review materials for this article, please visit http://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.23.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at http://doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2024.23.

Data availability statement

Data collected for this project, in the form of raw data in Excel, are available upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely thank the students from school of medicine (IMU) participated in collection of online data, data analysis and producing the initial draft of the manuscript in this project.

Author contribution

W.H.L. wrote the proposal for this project. L.M.A. supervised the entire project and analyzed the data together with students from the School of Medicine (IMU). W.H.L. and L.M.A. wrote the manuscript. Both authors approved the final manuscript.

Financial support

No financial support was obtained for the conduct of this research.

Competing interest

The authors declare no competing interests exist.

Ethics standard

This study was conducted after obtaining institutional approval from the International Medical University (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia), Project No. 4.12/JCM-212/2020. Informed written consent was obtained from the respondent on an online data collection platform prior to data collection. Each participant was coded, and information obtained during data collection is kept strictly confidential.

References

Abbas, A, Al-Otaibi, T, Gheith, OA, Nagib, AM, Farid, MM and Walaa, M (2021) Sleep quality among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on medical errors: Kuwait experience. Turkish Thoracic Journal 22(2), 142148. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkThoracJ.2021.20245.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abdul Latif, NI, Mohamed Ismail, NA, Loh, SYE, Nur Azurah, AG, Midin, M, Shah, SA and Kalok, A (2022) Psychological distress and COVID-19 related anxiety among Malaysian women during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19(8), 4590. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alwhaibi, M and Al Aloola, NA (2023) Associations between stress, anxiety, depression and sleep quality among healthcare students. Journal of Clinical Medicine 12(13), 4340. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134340.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anders, MP, Breckenkamp, J, Blettner, M, Schlehofer, B and Berg-Beckhoff, G (2014) Association between socioeconomic factors and sleep quality in an urban population-based sample in Germany. European Journal of Public Health 24(6), 968973. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckt175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aziz, NA, Othman, J, Lugova, H and Suleiman, A (2020) Malaysia’s approach in handling COVID-19 onslaught: Report on the movement control order (MCO) and targeted screening to reduce community infection rate and impact on public health and economy. Journal of Infection and Public Health 13(12), 18231829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2020.08.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boukhris, O, Jahrami, H, Trabelsi, K, Glenn, JM and Bragazzi, NL (2023) Impact of screen time during the pandemic of COVID-19 on sleep habits. In BaHammam, A, Pandi-Perumal, SR and Jahrami, H (eds), COVID-19 and Sleep: A Global Outlook. Singapore: Springer Nature, pp. 281294. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-0240-8_17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buysse, DJ, Reynolds, CF, Monk, TH, Berman, SR and Kupfer, DJ (1989) The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: A new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Research 28(2), 193213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chattu, VK, Manzar, MD, Kumary, S, Burman, D, Spence, DW and Pandi-Perumal, SR (2018) The global problem of insufficient sleep and its serious public health implications. Healthcare 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7010001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chopra, S, Ranjan, P, Singh, V, Kumar, S, Arora, M, Hasan, MS, Kasiraj, R, Suryansh, KD, Vikram, NK, Malhotra, A, Kumari, A, Klanidhi, KB and Baitha, U (2020) Impact of COVID-19 on lifestyle-related behaviours- a cross-sectional audit of responses from nine hundred and ninety-five participants from India. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Reviews 14(6), 20212030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2020.09.034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conroy, DA, Hadler, NL, Cho, E, Moreira, A, MacKenzie, C, Swanson, LM, Burgess, HJ, Arnedt, JT and Goldstein, CA (2021) The effects of COVID-19 stay-at-home order on sleep, health, and working patterns: A survey study of US health care workers. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine 17(2), 185191. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.8808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Garg, K, Goel, H and D Gupta, S (2020) High prevalence of insomnia during COVID-19 pandemic. Sleep Medicine and Disorders: International Journal 4(2), 5759. https://doi.org/10.15406/smdij.2020.04.00074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gualano, MR, Lo Moro, G, Voglino, G, Bert, F and Siliquini, R (2020) Effects of Covid-19 lockdown on mental health and sleep disturbances in Italy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17(13), 4779. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hashim, JH, Adman, MA, Hashim, Z, Mohd Radi, MF and Kwan, SC (2021) COVID-19 epidemic in Malaysia: Epidemic progression, challenges, and response. Frontiers in Public Health 9, 560592. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.560592.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hazizul Hasan, M and AE Moustafa, G (2022) Impact of COVID-19 lockdown on sleep quality of pharmacy students in UiTM Puncak Alam. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 30(10), 15211526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsps.2022.07.009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeong, SH, Jang, BN, Kim, SH, Kim, GR, Park, E-C and Jang, S-I (2021) Association between sedentary time and sleep quality based on the Pittsburgh sleep quality index among south Korean adults. BMC Public Health 21(1), 2290. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-12388-y.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kantor, J, Kantor, BN, Fortgang, RG and Pace-Schott, EF (2022) Sleep quality impairment is associated with pandemic attitudes during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) circuit breaker lockdown in England: A cross-sectional study. Frontiers in Public Health 10, 819231. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2022.819231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kline, C (2013) Sleep quality. In Gellman, MD and Turner, JR (eds), Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. New York: Springer, pp. 18111813. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuriakose, S and Tran, T (2020) Impacts of COVID-19 on firms in Malaysia: Results from the 1st Round of COVID-19 Business Pulse Survey. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/920721608701630943/pdf/Impacts-of-COVID-19-on-Firms-in-Malaysia-Results-from-the-First-Round-of-COVID-19-Business-Pulse-Survey.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lai, HBJ, Abidin, MRZ, Hasni, MZ, Karim, MSA and Ishak, FAC (2020) Key adaptations of SME restaurants in Malaysia amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147- 4478) 9(6), 6. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v9i6.916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, J, Ma, S, Wang, Y, Cai, Z, Hu, J, Wei, N, Wu, J, Du, H, Chen, T, Li, R, Tan, H, Kang, L, Yao, L, Huang, M, Wang, H, Wang, G, Liu, Z and Hu, S (2020) Factors associated with mental health outcomes among health care workers exposed to coronavirus disease 2019. JAMA Network Open 3(3), e203976. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.3976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law, Z (2020). Movement control order in Malaysia – Immediate implications. ZICO Law. March 17. https://www.zicolaw.com/resources/alerts/movement-control-order-in-malaysia-immediate-implications/.Google Scholar
Madrid-Valero, JJ, Martínez-Selva, JM, Couto, B, Sánchez-Romera, JF and Ordoñana, JR (2017) Age and gender effects on the prevalence of poor sleep quality in the adult population. Gaceta Sanitaria 31(1), 1822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaceta.2016.05.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez-de-Quel, Ó, Suárez-Iglesias, D, López-Flores, M and Pérez, CA (2021) Physical activity, dietary habits and sleep quality before and during COVID-19 lockdown: A longitudinal study. Appetite 158, 105019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.105019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marzo, RR, Shekhawat, KS, Chauhan, S, Patel, R, Kyaw, TM, Amran, B, Mat, MAI, Rajendiran, VA, Noor, MAM, Acharya, S and Shrestha, S (2021) Sleep disorder during the third wave of COVID-19 pandemic among Malaysian adults [Preprint]. In review. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-596311/v1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Micheletti Cremasco, M, Mulasso, A, Moroni, A, Testa, A, Degan, R, Rainoldi, A and Rabaglietti, E (2021) Relation among perceived weight change, sedentary activities and sleep quality during COVID-19 lockdown: A study in an academic community in Northern Italy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18(6), 2943. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18062943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randjelović, P, Stojiljković, N, Radulović, N, Ilić, I, Stojanović, N and Ilić, S (2019) The association of smartphone usage with subjective sleep quality and daytime sleepiness among medical students. Biological Rhythm Research 50(6), 857865. https://doi.org/10.1080/09291016.2018.1499374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robillard, R, Dion, K, Pennestri, M-H, Solomonova, E, Lee, E, Saad, M, Murkar, A, Godbout, R, Edwards, JD, Quilty, L, Daros, AR, Bhatla, R and Kendzerska, T (2021) Profiles of sleep changes during the COVID-19 pandemic: Demographic, behavioural and psychological factors. Journal of Sleep Research 30(1), e13231. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosekind, MR, Gregory, KB, Mallis, MM, Brandt, SL, Seal, B and Lerner, D (2010) The cost of poor sleep: Workplace productivity loss and associated costs. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 52(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3181c78c30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rossell, SL, Neill, E, Phillipou, A, Tan, EJ, Toh, WL, Van Rheenen, TE and Meyer, D (2021) An overview of current mental health in the general population of Australia during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the COLLATE project. Psychiatry Research 296, 113660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tasnim, S, Rahman, M, Pawar, P, Chi, X, Yu, Q, Zou, L, Sultana, A, McKyer, ELJ, Ma, P and Hossain, MM (2020) Epidemiology of sleep disorders during COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic scoping review (preprint). WHO COVID-19 Research Database. https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2020.10.08.20209148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Touyz, S, Lacey, H and Hay, P (2020) Eating disorders in the time of COVID-19. Journal of Eating Disorders 8(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-020-00295-3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Troisi, A, Nanni, RC, Riconi, A, Carola, V and Di Cave, D (2021) Fear of COVID-19 among healthcare workers: The role of neuroticism and fearful attachment. Journal of Clinical Medicine 10(19), 4358. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wage Subsidy Program (2021) Budget 2021. Available at https://belanjawan2021.treasury.gov.my/manfaat/index.php/en/wage-sub-prog-en (accessed 07 March 2024).Google Scholar
Yang, Y, Zhu, J, Yang, S, Lin, H, Chen, Y, Zhao, Q and Fu, C (2020) Prevalence and associated factors of poor sleep quality among Chinese returning workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Sleep Medicine 73, 4752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2020.06.034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Žilinskas, E, Puteikis, K and Mameniškienė, R (2022) Quality of sleep and work productivity among white-collar workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) 58(7), 883. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58070883.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristics of the respondents

Figure 1

Table 2. Description of numerical variables

Figure 2

Figure 1. Geographical distribution of respondents with poor sleep quality.

Figure 3

Table 3. Socioeconomic, lifestyle and occupational factors associated with sleep quality among the working adult population

Figure 4

Table 4. Multiple logistic regression analysis of poor sleep quality among the working adult population

Supplementary material: File

Aye and Lee supplementary material

Aye and Lee supplementary material
Download Aye and Lee supplementary material(File)
File 20 KB

Author comment: Poor sleep quality and its associated factors among working adults during COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia — R0/PR1

Comments

To

Editor-in-Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health Journal

Date: 01 May 2023

Dear Sir/Mdm,

We wish to submit our manuscript of the original article entitled, “Poor Sleep Quality and Its Associated Factors Among Working Adults During COVID-19 Pandemic in Malaysia: A Cross-sectional Study” for consideration by your journal.

We confirm that this work is original and has not been published elsewhere, nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.

In this paper, we explored sleep quality status and its association with the socioeconomic, employment and lifestyle factors of working adults during movement control order (MCO) period in Malaysia. It was a cross sectional study carried out among the 500 eligible working population across Malaysia. The study is significant because the results can be used to plan for preventive strategies during the period of crisis like COVID-19 pandemic. Since the working population is the backbone of the Malaysia’s economy, it is indeed important to provide them suitable support during the crisis. The results highlight that there are needs for public health interventions to empower the working population to adopt the healthy lifestyle, to achieve required level of physical activities and provide sleep hygiene education. The findings also provide the employers the evidence to provide measures to supports employees’ well-being during the challenging times.

All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and have agreed to submit the manuscript to the journal.

The reviewers proposed are also well suited to review our manuscript. To the best of my knowledge, none of the suggested reviewers has any conflict of interest.

We have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Please address all corresponding concerning this manuscript to me at [email protected].

Thank you for your consideration of this manuscript.

Sincerely,

Lwin Mie Aye

MBBS, MSc PH, PhD Candidate

Senior Lecturer, Public Health, and Community Medicine Department

International Medical University,

No. 129, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil,

57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Recommendation: Poor sleep quality and its associated factors among working adults during COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia — R0/PR2

Comments

The reviewers commend your paper but each have recommendations to strengthen it. Please address all the reviewers' comments.

Decision: Poor sleep quality and its associated factors among working adults during COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia — R0/PR3

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Poor sleep quality and its associated factors among working adults during COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia — R1/PR4

Comments

To

Editor-in-Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health Journal

Date: 03 December 2023

Dear Sir/Mdm,

We wish to submit our manuscript of the original article entitled, “Poor Sleep Quality and Its Associated Factors Among Working Adults During COVID-19 Pandemic in Malaysia: A Cross-sectional Study” for consideration by your journal.

We confirm that this work is original and has not been published elsewhere, nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.

In this paper, we explored sleep quality status and its association with the socioeconomic, employment and lifestyle factors of working adults during movement control order (MCO) period in Malaysia. It was a cross sectional study carried out among the 500 eligible working population across Malaysia. The study is significant because the results can be used to plan for preventive strategies during the period of crisis like COVID-19 pandemic. Since the working population is the backbone of the Malaysia’s economy, it is indeed important to provide them suitable support during the crisis. The results highlight that there are needs for public health interventions to empower the working population to adopt the healthy lifestyle, to achieve required level of physical activities and provide sleep hygiene education. The findings also provide the employers the evidence to provide measures to supports employees’ well-being during the challenging times.

All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and have agreed to submit the manuscript to the journal.

The reviewers proposed are also well suited to review our manuscript. To the best of my knowledge, none of the suggested reviewers has any conflict of interest.

We have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Please address all corresponding concerning this manuscript to me at [email protected].

Thank you for your consideration of this manuscript.

Sincerely,

Lwin Mie Aye

MBBS, MSc PH, PhD Candidate

Senior Lecturer, Public Health, and Community Medicine Department

International Medical University,

No. 129, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil,

57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Recommendation: Poor sleep quality and its associated factors among working adults during COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia — R1/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Poor sleep quality and its associated factors among working adults during COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia — R1/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Poor sleep quality and its associated factors among working adults during COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia — R2/PR7

Comments

To

Editor-in-Chief

Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health Journal

Date: 17 January 2024

Dear Sir/Mdm,

We wish to submit our manuscript of the original article entitled, “Poor Sleep Quality and Its Associated Factors Among Working Adults During COVID-19 Pandemic in Malaysia” for consideration by your journal.

We confirm that this work is original and has not been published elsewhere, nor is it currently under consideration for publication elsewhere.

In this paper, we explored sleep quality status and its association with the socioeconomic, employment and lifestyle factors of working adults during movement control order (MCO) period in Malaysia. It was a cross sectional study carried out among the 500 eligible working population across Malaysia. The study is significant because the results can be used to plan for preventive strategies during the period of crisis like COVID-19 pandemic. Since the working population is the backbone of the Malaysia’s economy, it is indeed important to provide them suitable support during the crisis. The results highlight that there are needs for public health interventions to empower the working population to adopt the healthy lifestyle, to achieve required level of physical activities and provide sleep hygiene education. The findings also provide the employers the evidence to provide measures to supports employees’ well-being during the challenging times.

All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and have agreed to submit the manuscript to the journal.

The reviewers proposed are also well suited to review our manuscript. To the best of my knowledge, none of the suggested reviewers has any conflict of interest.

We have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Please address all corresponding concerning this manuscript to me at [email protected].

Thank you for your consideration of this manuscript.

Sincerely,

Lwin Mie Aye

MBBS, MSc PH, PhD Candidate

Senior Lecturer, Public Health, and Community Medicine Department

International Medical University,

No. 129, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil,

57000, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Recommendation: Poor sleep quality and its associated factors among working adults during COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia — R2/PR8

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Poor sleep quality and its associated factors among working adults during COVID-19 pandemic in Malaysia — R2/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.