Article contents
Constitutional Identity and the Politics of Homogeneity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 March 2019
Extract
The identity of the European Union has, for some years now, been the topic of many debates. The recent enlargement of the Union has stirred this debate and has not appeased it. There are various key topics that inspire the discussion, which included, for example, conceptions of citizenship. The following remarks will offer a sketch of some of the issues that come to the fore in this respect. Of particular interest here are the connections between the process of the constitutionalisation of Europe and the question of the desirability, or even necessity, of a homogenous European identity. I will first name some exemplary concrete problems that are connected with questions of politics of identity. I will then undertake a short illustrative look into the history of ideas to trace back some of the lines of thought that are relevant in the discussion. Finally, I want to suggest a possible normative perspective of how to proceed.
- Type
- Articles: Special Issue: Confronting Memories – Constitutionalization after Bitter Experiences
- Information
- German Law Journal , Volume 6 , Issue 2: Article: Special Issue - Confronting Memories: European „Bitter Experiences“ and the Constitutionalization Process , 01 February 2005 , pp. 307 - 317
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2005 by German Law Journal GbR
References
1 Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts (Judgments of the Federal Constitutional Court), BVerfGE 89, 155.Google Scholar
2 Cf., BVerfGE 89, 155 (174, 190). For a critique see Joseph Weiler, The state “über alles”: Demos, telos and the German Maastricht decision (Badia Fiesolana, San Domenico (FI), 1995, EUI working papers: Robert Schuman Centre 95, 19).Google Scholar
3 Id., 184.Google Scholar
4 Isaiah Berlin rightly warned against the dangers of de-personalized accounts of history; cf., Isaiah Berlin, Liberty 98 et seq (2002).Google Scholar
5 Cf., on these matters, one of the most influential essays on questions of state and religion: John Locke, Letter on toleration (1996).Google Scholar
6 Bundesverfassungsgericht, 56 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 3111 (2003).Google Scholar
7 Mahlmann, Compare Matthias, Religious Tolerance, Pluralist Society and the Neutrality of the State: The Federal Constitutional Court's Decision in the Headscarf Case, 4 German Law Journal 1199 (2003), available at: http://www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php?id=331; Matthias Mahlmann, Dienstrechtliche Konkretisierung staatlicher Neutralität, 37 Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 123 (2004).Google Scholar
8 Cf., Council Directive 200/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, Official Journal L 303, 2.12.2000, 16.Google Scholar
9 European Court of Human Rights, Case 42393/98, 15.2.2001, Dahlab v. Switzerland; Case 44774/98, 29 June 2004, Sahin v. Turkey.Google Scholar
10 Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde, Die Entstehung des Staates als Vorgang der Säkularisation, in: Staat, Gesellschaft, Freiheit 60 (1976).Google Scholar
11 The main political actors voicing scepticism about the accession raise the issue of European Identity avoid, however, such far reaching conclusions in their public statements, cf. e.g. the parliamentary motion of the German Conservative Party, CDU, Deutscher Bundestag, Drucksache 15/3949, 19 October 2004.Google Scholar
12 Kagan, Robert, Power and Weakness, 113 Policy Review (2002), http://www.policyreview.org/JUN02/. See the contributions to the Special Issue of the German Law Journal, dedicated to the Kagan Thesis: “The Kagan Phenomenon and the New Transatlantic Tensions”, 4 German Law Journal No. 9 (1 September 2003), with contributions by Smith, Bratspies, Miller, Dilling, Buckel & Wissel, Harrington, Afsah, Paulus, Wrange and Lotherington (all available at: http://www.germanlawjournal.com/past_issues_archive.php?show=9&volume=4).Google Scholar
13 Immanuel Kant, Zum Ewigen Frieden (Akademie Ausgabe, vol. VIII) 341.Google Scholar
14 Cf., id., 366.Google Scholar
15 Kagan 10 (note 10): “The reasons of the transatlantic divide are deep, long in development, and likely to endure. When it comes to setting national priorities, determining threats, defining challenges, and fashioning and implementing foreign and defence policies, the United States and Europe have parted ways.” Cf., Robert Kagan, Of Paradise and Power (2003).Google Scholar
16 Immanuel Kant, Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der Bloßen Vernunft (Akademie Ausgabe, vol. VI) 98.Google Scholar
17 Kant (note 11), 360.Google Scholar
18 Immanuel Kant, Die Metaphysik der Sitten (Akademie Ausgabe, vol. VI) 312.Google Scholar
19 Wilhelm von Humboldt, Ideen zu einem Versuch, die Gränzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen (2002).Google Scholar
20 John Stuart Mill, On Liberty, in: On Liberty and other essays (1991).Google Scholar
21 Cf., Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts 258, 271 (1986).Google Scholar
22 Id., 334.Google Scholar
23 Martin Heidegger, Sein und Zeit 384 (1984). Cf., Matthias Mahlmann, Heidegger's political philosophy and the theory of the liberal state, 14 Law and Critique 229 (2003).Google Scholar
24 Cf., John Rawls, Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy 365 (2000).Google Scholar
25 Carl Schmitt, Der Begriff des Politischen (1963).Google Scholar
26 Carl Schmitt, Verfassungslehre (1928).Google Scholar
27 Smend, Rudolf, Verfassung und Verfassungsrecht, in: Staatsrechtliche Abhandlungen 119 (1968).Google Scholar
28 Kelsen, Hans, Der Staat als Integration (1930).Google Scholar
29 Habermas, Jürgen, Faktizität und Geltung 632 (1992); Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur 124 (2004).Google Scholar
- 6
- Cited by