Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
Since Salter, in 1865, published his classification of the species of the genus Homalonotus, no detailed attempt has been made to re-arrange the increased number of species now known into natural groups. Salter was not convinced that his scheme was satisfactory, and appears to have regarded it as largely artificial, though convenient. The divisions instituted or recognized by him bore the names Brongniartia, Salter, 1865 (divided into two sections); Trimerus, Green, 1832; Kænigia, Salter, 1865; Dipleura, Green, 1832; and Burmeisteria, Salter, 1865.
page 263 note 1 Salter, Mon. Brit. Trilob., 1865, pp. 104, 105Google Scholar.
page 263 note 2 Koch, & Kayser, , Abh. geol. specialk. Preuss., Bd. iv, Heft ii, pp. 73–157, 1883Google Scholar.
page 263 note 3 Bigot, , Bull. Soc. Géol. France, ser. iii, vol. xvi, pp. 419–35, 1888Google Scholar.
page 264 note 1 Hall, , Palæont. New York, vol. vii, p. xxiii, 1888Google Scholar.
page 264 note 2 Pompecki, , Neues Jahrb. f. Miner. Geol., Bd. i, pp. 235–43, 1898Google Scholar.
page 264 note 3 Woodward, , Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, vol. X, p. 28, 1903CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
page 264 note 4 Gürich, , Leitfossilien, Lief. i, Camb. Silur., p. 70, pl. xxvi, figs. 1–3, 1908Google Scholar.
page 264 note 5 Moberg, & Grönwall, , Om Fyled. Gotlands, Lunds Univ. Arssk., N.F., Af. ii, Bd. v, No. 1, pp. 72–7, 1909.Google Scholar
page 264 note 6 Gürich, , Leitfossilien, Lief. ii, Devon, pp. 155–7, 1909.Google Scholar
page 264 note 7 Woods, , Crustacea and Arachnids, vol. iv, Camb. Nat. Hist., section Trilobita, p. 249, 1909.Google Scholar
page 264 note 8 Raymond, , in Eastman-Zittel's Textbook of Palœontology, vol. i, p. 724, 1913.Google Scholar
page 264 note 9 Clarke, , Foss. Dev. Parana (Mon. Serv. Geol. Miner. Brasil, vol. i), pp. 89–101, 1913.Google Scholar
page 264 note 10 König, , Icones Sectiles, 1825, pl. vii, fig. 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 265 note 1 Salter, , Mon. Brit. Trilob., p. 106.Google Scholar
page 265 note 2 Hall, , Palæont. New York, vol. vii, p. xxiv, 1888.Google Scholar
page 265 note 3 Salter, , Mon. Brit. Trilob., p. 104.Google Scholar
page 266 note 1 Woodward, , Geol. Mag., Dec. IV, vol. X, p. 28, 1903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 266 note 2 Green, , Monthly Amer. Journ. Geol., vol. i, p. 559, pl. O, fig. 1, 1832.Google Scholar
page 266 note 3 Salter, , op. cit., p. 115.Google Scholar
page 266 note 4 Hall, , Palæont. N.Y., vol. ii, p. 309, pl. lxviii, figs. 1–14.Google Scholar
page 267 note 1 Salter, , Trans. Geol. Soc., ser. ii, vol. vii, p. 216, pl. xxiv, fig. 1c, 1856.Google Scholar
page 267 note 2 Barrande, , Syst. Silur. Bohême, vol. i, pl. v, fig. 10.Google Scholar
page 270 note 1 Eaton, , op. cit., pl. ii, fig. 20.Google Scholar
page 270 note 2 Ibid., pl. ii, fig. 22.
page 270 note 3 Vogdes, , Bibliogr. Palæoz. Crust. (Occas. Papers Calif. Acad. Sci., iv, p. 311, 1893); Weller, Bull. iv, pt. ii, Nat. Hist. Surv., Chicago Acad. Sci., 1907, p. 200.Google Scholar
page 270 note 4 Salter, , Appendix to M'Coy's Syn. Brit. Paleoz. Foss. Woodw. Mus., 1852, p. v, pl. i g, figs. 24–8.Google Scholar
page 270 note 5 Id., Mon. Brit. Trilob., 1865, p. 105, pl. x, figs. 3–10.Google Scholar
page 271 note 1 Salter, , op. cit., pl. i g, figs. 25, 28.Google Scholar
page 272 note 11 Ibid., pl. i g, figs. 29, 30.
page 272 note 12 Salter, , Mem. Geol. Surv., vol. iii (2nd ed., 1881), p. 526, pl. 11a, fig. 8Google Scholar.
page 272 note 13 Bailey, , Fig. Char. Brit. Foss., i, pl. xiii, fig. 9a, 1875.Google Scholar
page 272 note 14 Reed, , Geol. Mag., Dec. V, vol. VII, p. 216, Pl. XVII, Figs. 4–8, 1910.Google Scholar
page 272 note 15 Appendix to M'Coy's Syn. Pal. Foss. Woodw. Mus., p. v, pl. i e, figs. 20, 20a.
page 273 note 11 Salter, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xx, p. 290, pl. xv, figs. 1a, b, 1864; Mon. Brit. Trilob., p. 110, pl. x, figs. 15–17; pl. xiii, fig. 9.Google Scholar
page 273 note 2 Ibid., p. 111, pl. xiii, fig. 10.
page 273 note 3 Ibid., p. 112, pl. x, fig. 18.
page 273 note 4 Ibid., p. 112, woodcut, fig. 26.
page 273 note 5 Bigot, , Bull. Soc. Géol. France, ser. III, vol. xvi, p. 427, 1888.Google Scholar
page 273 note 6 Murchison, , Silur. Syst., 1839, p. 663; id., Siluria, 2nd ed., 1859, pl. ii, figs. 3, 4.Google Scholar
page 274 note 1 Salter, , Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc., vol. xx, p. 290, pl. xv, fig. 1, 1864.Google Scholar
page 274 note 2 Morière, , Bull. Soc. Linn. Normandie, ser. III, vol. viii, p. 383, pls. i, ii, 1884.Google Scholar
page 274 note 3 Collins, , Trans. Roy. Geol. Soc. Cornwall, 1893, p. 53 (reprint).Google Scholar
page 274 note 4 Barrande, , Syst. Silur. Bohême, Suppl. 1, p. 37, pl. i, fig. 6.Google Scholar
page 274 note 5 Barrande, , Syst. Silur. Bohême, vol. i, p. 580, pl. xxxiv, figs. 40–2.Google Scholar
page 274 note 6 Lebesconte, , Bull. Soc. Géol. France, ser. III, vol. xiv, p. 801, pl. xxxvi, figs. 12, 13, 1857.Google Scholar
page 274 note 7 Novak, , Böhm. Trilob., i (Beitr. Palæont. Oest. Ung., Bd. iii, 1881), p. 27, t. viii, figs. 9a–c.Google Scholar
page 274 note 8 De Verneuil, , Bull. Soc. Géol. France, ser. III, vol. xii, p. 971, pl. xxiii, fig. 1a, 1855.Google Scholar
page 274 note 9 König, , Icones Sectiles, 1825, pl. vii, fig. 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
page 275 note 1 Salter, , Mon. Brit. Trilob., p. 106.Google Scholar
page 275 note 2 Ibid., p. 119, pl. xii, figs. 2–10, pl. xiii, fig. 8.
page 275 note 3 Grönwall, Moberg, Om Fyled. Gotl., Lunds Univ. Arssk., N.F., Af. ii, Bd. v, No. 1, pp. 72–7, pl. v, figs. 1–4, 1909.Google Scholar
page 275 note 4 Salter, , op. cit., p. 117, pl. xiii, figs. 1–7.Google Scholar