Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:01:30.546Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Silurian trilobites from NE Queensland and the classification of effaced trilobites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2009

P. D. Lane  and
A. T. Thomas
P. D. Lane
Affiliation:
Geology Department, University of Keele, Keele, Staffs ST5 5BG
A. T. Thomas
Affiliation:
Sedgwick Museum, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A trilobite fauna of Llandovery/Wenlock age is described. Five species are represented:Rhax polllnctrix gen. et sp. nov. (Scutelluidae), a warburgelline?, Sphaerexochus sp.,Encrinurus? sp., and a calymenid. The morphology of R. pollinctrix supports the view that Bumastus is a scutelluid, and consequently that the Illaenidae, as presently conceived, is polyphyletic.

Type
Articles
Information
Geological Magazine , Volume 115 , Issue 5 , September 1978 , pp. 351 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Angelin, N. P. 1854. Palaeontologia Scandinavica. I. Crustacea formationis transitionis, fasc. 2, 21–92, pls. 25–41. Lund.Google Scholar
Arnold, G. O. & Henderson, R. A. 1976. Lower Palaeozoic history of the southwestern Broken River Province, North Queensland, J. geol. Soc. Aust. 23, 73–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balashova, E. A. 1959. Middle and Upper Ordovician and Lower Silurian trilobites of eastern Taimyr, and their stratigraphical significance. Sb. Stat. Paleont. Biostratigr. 17, 17–47, pls. 1–6 (relevant plates in ibid. 14) (Russian).Google Scholar
Beyrich, E. 1845. Ueber einige böhmischen Trilobiten. Berlin.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H. 1843. Die Organisation der Trilobiten, aus ihren lebenden verwandten entwickelt; nebst einer systematischen Uebersicht aller zeither beschriebenen Arten. Berlin.Google Scholar
Chatterton, B. D. E. & Ludvigsen, R. 1976. Silicified middle Ordovician trilobites from the South Nahanni River area, district of Mackenzie, Canada. Palaeontographica (A) 154, 1–106, pls. 1–22Google Scholar
Emmrich, H. F. 1844. Zur Naturgeschichte der Trilobiten. Programm zur öffentlichen Prüfung, weiche mit den Zölingen der Realschule in Meiningen Donnerstag dem 28, und Freitag den 29 März 1844 im grossen Horsaale der Anstalt abgehalten werden soll, etc. 26 pp., 1 pl. Meiningen. (Also 1845 Neues lb. Miner. Geol. Paläont. 18–52.)Google Scholar
Hawle, I. & Corda, A. J. C. 1847. Prodrom einer Monographie der böhmischen Trilobiten. 176 pp., 7 pls. Prague. (Also 1848, Abh. K. böhm. Ges. Wiss. 5, 117–292, pls. 1–7).Google Scholar
Kolobova, I. M. 1973. On the systematic position of the Brontocephalidae fam.nov. (Trilobita). Ezheg. vses. paleont. Obshch. 19. (Russian.)Google Scholar
Lane, P. D. 1972. New trilobites from the Silurian of north-east Greenland, with a note on trilobite faunas in pure limestones. Palaeontology 15, 336–64, p15. 59–64.Google Scholar
Lane, P. D. & Thomas, A. T. (in the press). Family Scutelluidae.In A. T. Thomas: British Wenlock trilobites. Palaeontogr. Soc. [Momogr.]Google Scholar
Lu, Y-H. 1962. Restudy on Grabau's types of three Silurian trilobites from Hupeh. Acta palaeont. sinica 10, 158–75, p1. 1 (Chinese with English summary 167–74).Google Scholar
McKellar, R. G. 1969. Brachiopods and trilobites from Siluro-Devonian strata in the Rockhampton district, Queensland. Publs. geol. Surv. Qd, no. 337, Pal. Pap. no 11, 1–13, 3 pls.Google Scholar
Miller, J. 1976. The sensory fields and life mode of Phacops rana (Green, 1832) (Trilobita). Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 69 (16), 337–67, 4 pls.Google Scholar
Moore, R. C. (ed). 1959. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology, Part O. Arthropoda 1. Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press (Lawrence).Google Scholar
Murchison, R. I. 1839. The Silurian System, founded on geological researches in the counties of Salop, Hereford, Radnor, Montgomery, Caermarthen, Brecon, Pembroke, Monmouth, Gloucester, Worcester and Stafford; with descriptions of the coalfields and overlying formations. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Öpik, A. A. 1937. Trilobiten aus Estland. Acta. Comment. Univ. Tartu, (A), 32, (3), 1–163, pls. 1–26. (Pub. Geol. Inst. Univ. Tartu, 52.)Google Scholar
Owens, R. M. 1973. British Ordovician and Silurian Proetidae (Trilobita). Palaeontogr. Soc. [Monogr.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, R. M. & Thomas, A. T. 1975. Radnoria, a new Silurian proetacean trilobite, and the origins of the Brachymetopidae. Palaeontology, 18, 809–22, pls. 95–96.Google Scholar
Prantl, F. & Přibyl, A. 1951. A revision of the Bohemian representatives of the Family Otarionidae R. and E. Richter (Trilobitae). Stót, geol. Úst. Cesk. Rep. 17 (for 1950), 353–512, 5 pls. (Czech and English text, Russian summary.)Google Scholar
Přibyl, A. & Vanék, J. 1971. Studie über die Familie Scutelluidae Richter et Richter (Trilobita) und ihre phylogenetische entwicklung. Acta Univ. Carol. Geol. 4, 361–94, 10 p15.Google Scholar
Richter, R. & Richter, E. 1955. Scutelluidae n.n. (Tril.) durch ‘kleine Anderung’ eines Familien-Namens wegen Homonymie. Senckenberg. leth. 36, 291–3.Google Scholar
Snajdr, M. 1960. Studie o čledi Scutelluidae (Trilobitae). Rozpr. üstred. Ust. geol. 26, 11–221, pls. 1–36 (English summary 227–65).Google Scholar
Wahlenberg, G. 1818. Petrificata telluris Suecanae. Nova Acta R. Soc. Scient. Upsal. 8, (for 1821), 1—116, pls. 1–4.Google Scholar
White, D. A. 1965. The geology of the Georgetown/Clarke River Area, Queensland. Bull. Bur. Miner. Resour. Geol. Geophys. Aust. 71.Google Scholar