Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 May 2009
The specimen which forms the subject of this note has been kindly placed in my hands by Professor G. Dewalque for examination, and is of extreme interest and importance to me in my researches upon the Fossil Crustacea. It is not, as was at first supposed, the metastome of Eurypterus or of Pterygotus; on the contrary, it represents an almost entire carapace of a new genus and species of Phyllopod Crustacean allied to Peltocaris
page 444 note 2 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xix. p. 88, fig. 1, pl. xxi. fig. 10 (1863).Google Scholar
page 444 note 3 Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. vol. xxii. p. 504, pl. xxv. figs. 4–7.Google Scholar
page 444 note 4 Geol. Mag. 1872, Vol. IX. p. 564, id. 1873, Brit. Assoc. Rep. 1872.Google Scholar
page 445 note 1 Several specimens in the British Museum have this anterior (cephalic) portion of the carapace preserved in situ, so that it existed in all without any manner of doubt.
page 446 note 1 Since this paper appeared in the Annals of the Geological Society of Belgium in August last I have published descriptions of a series of five new forms of Phyllopod shields from the Upper Devonian of the Eifel under the genera Cardioiaris and Pholadocaris. See Geol. Mag. 1882, September No., pp. 385–390, Pl. IX.Google Scholar