Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:16:06.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Preliminary Studies of Intercropping Combinations Based on Pigeonpea or Sorghum†

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2008

M. R. Rao  and
R. W. Willey
M. R. Rao
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru P.O. 502 34L, A.P., India
R. W. Willey
Affiliation:
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Patancheru P.O. 502 34L, A.P., India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Various intercrops were examined in an alternate row pattern with pigeonpea or sorghum on both Alfisol (red soil) and Vertisol (black soil). The slow-establishing and later-maturing pigeonpea combined well with earlier cereals and legumes to give very large yield advantages as measured by the Land Equivalent Ratio. In the pigeonpea/cereal combinations, the earlier the cereal the bigger the yield advantage tended to be, attributed to improved use of resources over time as the difference in maturity periods of the component crops increased. Sorghum was generally more competitive than pigeonpea and intercropping advantages tended to be less. But even where there was little difference in maturity periods of the component crops, both sorghum/legume and sorghum/cereal combinations gave substantial and statistically significant advantages, suggesting that improved ‘spatial’ use of resources was also important.

Type
Research Article
Information
Experimental Agriculture , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , January 1980 , pp. 29 - 39
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aiyer, , Yegna Narayana, A. K. (1949). Ind. J. Agric. Sci. 19:439–548.Google Scholar
Andrews, D. J. (1972). Expl Agric. 8:139–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1964). Experimental Designs (2nd edn.). New Delhi: Wiley.Google Scholar
Freyman, S. & Venkateswarlu, J. (1977). Can. J. Plant Sci. 57:697–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IRRI (1974). Internat. Rice Res. Inst. A. Rep. for 1974.Google Scholar
IRRI (1975). Internat. Rice Res. Inst A. Rep. for 1975.Google Scholar
Jodha, (1979). Proc. Int. Intercropping Workshop, ICRISAT, Hyderabad, India (in press).Google Scholar
Krishnamurthy, Ch. (1974). Internat. Workshop on Farming Systems ICRISAT, Hyderabad, India, 274–286.Google Scholar
Osiru, D. S. O. & Willey, R. W. (1972). J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 79:531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, N. G. P. (1975). Ind. Farming 25(9):7–14.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. (1979). Field Crop Abst. 32(1):1, 32 (2):73–85.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. & Osiru, D. S. O. (1972). J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 79:519–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar