Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T02:46:33.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Service Evaluation of Headucate’s Educational Intervention to Reduce Stigma and Increase Mental Health Literacy Among School Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

C. Robertson
Affiliation:
Medicine, The University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
D. King
Affiliation:
Psychology, The University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
S. Bagge
Affiliation:
Psychology, The University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
N. Allen
Affiliation:
Medicine, The University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
S. Parker
Affiliation:
Medicine, The University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
L. Piper
Affiliation:
Medicine, The University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
T. Wade
Affiliation:
Medicine, The University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
J. Beezhold
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Norfolk and Suffolk NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, United Kingdom

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

With one in ten young people being affected by ill mental health and stigma regularly cited as a factor affecting access to early intervention services, focussing resources on school based stigma reduction strategies seems prudent. ‘Headucate’, a student society, designed a 50 minute workshop which aims to increase mental health literacy and decrease stigma.

Methodology

Repeated, cross sectional surveys were carried out at three time points; 1) immediately before (n=77), 2) Immediately after (n=81) and 3) three months post workshop (n=73). The surveys were paper based versions of the Reported Intended Behaviours Score (RIBS) and Mental Health Knowledge Scale (MAKS) utilising a social distance scale.

Results

Four year 10 classed (pupils aged 14-15) were recruited. Post hoc t-tests were carried out when one-way ANOVAS were significant.

Disorder knowledge (from MAKS) and intended contact (from RIBS) significantly increased between time points one and two (p<0.01 and <0.004 respectively) but then decreased.

Analysis of the question pertaining to knowing where to access help showed a statistically significant increase (p<0.001) between time points one and two and then a decrease at time three, albeit to a higher value than at time point one (3.45 compared to 3.13, P=0.088).

Discussion

Headucate workshops offer a low resource option which is well accepted by students. Like other school based stigma reduction strategies, a dramatic increase was seen between immediately before and after indicating that the workshop resonates with the pupils, but there was little sustained change in attitudes.

Type
Article: 1212
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.