Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:23:39.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PW01-236 - Impulsivity And Startle Habituation As Vulnerability Markers For Alcoholism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

M. Marin
Affiliation:
Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
I. Martinez
Affiliation:
Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
G. Ponce
Affiliation:
Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
A. Koeneke
Affiliation:
Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
J. Lopez
Affiliation:
Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
G. Rubio
Affiliation:
Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
M.A. Jimenez-Arriero
Affiliation:
Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

Impulsivity has been considered as a risk factor for alcohol dependence. Recent research is focusing on paradigms of the startle response (SR), specifically prepulse inhibition (PPI) and startle habituation (SH), as vulnerability markers for alcoholism. It has been demonstrated impairments in the PPI and the SH in offspring of alcoholics. It has also been shown, using personality questionnaires, that faster habituation may be associated with tendency toward impulsivity and behavioral disinhibition. Our goal is to study the correlation between impulsivity laboratory measures and the SR paradigms, in order to see if they could share a common base as endophenotypes for alcoholism.

Method

The subjects were 40 abstinent alcoholic males, aged 18 to 65 years (mean age 44.73) and who had met DSM-IV criteria for Alcohol Dependence, being abstinent for more than a month at the moment they were tested. Participants underwent testing for PPI and habituation of the acoustic startle response. Impulsivity was assessed with three different laboratory measures: Continuous Performance Test (CPT), Stop-Signal Task and Differential Reinforcement for Low-Rate Responding (DRL6). Analyses were performed using SPSS v.10.0.

Results

We found a significant positive correlation between CPT-tasks and SH (p< 0,01), and Stop-Signal Task-tasks and SH (p< 0,05), but not with DRL6-tasks. No significant correlation was demonstrated between impulsivity measures and PPI.

Conclusions

Our findings suggest the existence of a common base between impulsivity and SH as vulnerability markers for alcohol dependence. Further studies are needed to assess if both could share a common genetic origin.

Type
Substance related disorders
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2009
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.