Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:33:54.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P-307 - Psychometric Properties of the “difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale” in Spanish (ders-e) in Mexican Adolescents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

M. Marín Tejeda
Affiliation:
Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico (UNAM), Mexico
R. Robles García
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico
P. andrade Palos
Affiliation:
Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico (UNAM), Mexico
C. González-Forteza
Affiliation:
Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente, Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction:

Emotional Dysregulation (ED) is the decreased capacity to experiment and differentiate an ample range of emotions, as well as to monitor, evaluate and modify intense emotional states. the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) was developed for adults, has good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.93), and test-retest reliability.

Objectives:

To translate and determine the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the DERS (DERS-E) in a non clinical Mexican adolescent's sample.

Method:

455 students of a public high school in the Mexico City participated; the mean age was 13.1 + .95 years old. the scale was administrated in groups of 40 students, who concurrently answered the Spanish version of the following measures:

  1. i) Self-injury schedule;

  2. ii) Beck depression inventory;

  3. iii) Beck anxiety inventory; and

  4. iv) Plutchik's Impulsivity scale.

Results:

The first confirmatory factorial analysis (CFA) showed that the data didn’t replicate the original 6 factor structure (Chi2 = 22339.4, fd = 6, p < 0.05). An exploratory factorial analysis showed that the data adjusted with a 24 items and 4 factors model (corroborated with a second CFA: Chi2 = 259.729, fd = 230, p > 0.05); the subscales Cronbach’ α were from .85 to .68. the validity through contrasted groups and the correlation with concurrent scales showed significant results (Pearson's r of .51. to .76, p < 0.05).

Conclusions:

The DERS-E didn’t replicate the factorial structure of the original scale, but showed a similar and multidimensional structure of 4 factors and showed good psychometric properties, with respect to internal consistency and concurrent validity.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.