Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:01:11.670Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P-1103 - Patient Attitudes, Satisfaction, Tolerability for Conventional Depot Antipsychotics and Risperidone Long Acting Injection: a Cross-sectional Survey in Community Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

S. Moti Singh
Affiliation:
Psychiatry, Springfield Hospital, South West London and St George's NHS Trust, London
P.M. Haddad
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Neurosciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
N. Husain
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Neurosciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
B. Tomenson
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Neurosciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
I.B. Chaudhry
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Neurosciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Maintenance antipsychotic medication has a key role in the long term management of schizophrenia but in clinical practice its effectiveness is often reduced by poor adherence. Antipsychotic long acting injections (LAIs) can improve clinical outcomes in those who have adhered poorly with oral medication.

Aims and objectives

To compare patients’ attitudes, satisfaction and tolerability to their currently prescribed LAI, either a FGA-LAI or risperidone long-acting injection (RLAI), which was the only SGA-LAI at the time of this research.

Method

Cross-sectional survey of a representative sample of patients prescribed a FGA-LAI (n = 39) or RLAI (n = 28) for a minimum of 6 months. Assessments comprised drug attitude inventory (DAI-30), tolerability measured by Liverpool university neuroleptic side effect rating scale (LUNSERS) and satisfaction with antipsychotic medication by the SWAM scale.

Results

The DAI-30 score for patients on FGA depots was 16.18 and RLAI was 14.43, which indicated positive attitudes in both the groups. This difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.491). Further analysis, based on both the LUNSERS and SWAM scales, did not find any significant difference in tolerability and patient satisfaction.

Conclusions

There was no evidence of differences between FGA-LAIs and RLAI in terms of patient rated tolerability, attitudes and satisfaction. Both groups of patients had positive attitudes to their LAI and overall tolerability was good. This data is observational, and not from a randomised design, which may reflect selection bias. Randomised studies are needed to further investigate differences in tolerability and attitudes between specific LAIs.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.