Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T10:33:32.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P-1024 - Differences in Subliminal Priming Effect a Comparison Study On:parkinson's Disease Patients, Alcohol Dependent Patients, Young Healthy Controls and Elderly Controls-preliminary Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

M. Michalak
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Casimir the Great University, Bydgoszcz, Poland
P. Jaskowski
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Psychology, University of Finance and Management, Warszawa, Poland
M. Ziolkowski
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry Nursing, Collegium Medicum of Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun, Bydgoszcz, Poland
E. Gorzelanczyk
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warszawa, Poland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

It is commonly accepted that unconsciously perceived masked priming stimuli can trigger partial activation of motor responses or recognition processes. It has been shown in numerous studies that reaction times for compatible trials (primes and targets call for the same responses) are shorter than for incompatible trials for short prime-target temporal distances. On the contrary, for long prime-target temporal distances reaction times for compatible trials are longer than for incompatible trials.

Objectives

Subliminal priming of motor reaction is rarely used in clinical studies of patients with neuropsychiatric disorders.

Aims

To test whether pattern of responses in subliminal priming of motor reaction task differs between healthy controls, alcohol dependent people and Parkinson's disease patients.

Methods

Participants from four groups were examined:Parkinson's disease patients, alcohol dependent patients, young healthy controls and elderly controls. Subliminal priming of motor reaction task was used.

Results

It was found that reaction time to subliminal visual stimuli in individuals from different groups varies. A specific pattern of responses was observed for each group. Reaction times were the shortest in the group of young controls and the longest in Parkinson's disease patients. Processing visual stimuli in alcohol dependent people and Parkinson's disease patients seems to have different mechanism in comparison to healthy controls.

Conclusions

Analysis of mean reaction times during presentation of compatible and incompatible trials allows to differentiate examined groups at quantitative and qualitative level. Differences between particular groups (especially alcohol dependent and Parkinson's disease patients) may contribute to better understanding and diagnosis of the diseases.

Type
Abstract
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2012
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.