Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:31:41.375Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P02-50 - Victimological Aspects of Forensic Psychiatric Assessment of Mental Disorders in Victims of Crimes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

A. Berezantsev
Affiliation:
Forensic Psychiatric Department, Serbsky National Research Center for Social and Forensic Psychiatry, Moscow, Russia
M. Kachaeva
Affiliation:
Forensic Psychiatric Department, Serbsky National Research Center for Social and Forensic Psychiatry, Moscow, Russia
T. Filatov
Affiliation:
Forensic Psychiatric Department, Serbsky National Research Center for Social and Forensic Psychiatry, Moscow, Russia

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The testimonies of victims of crimes are extremely important in criminal prosecution and court proceedings because often they are the only witnesses of the crime.

Aims

To find out clinical factors which determine victimological behavior in adult persons with mental disorders who become victims of crime and to work out criteria of their competence to stand trial.

Methods

Psychopathological, psychological, statistical.

Results

128 adult patients with different mental disorders were examined (organic brain disorders, mental retardation, schizophrenia, personality disorders). All were victims of crimes (rape, robbery, beating, fraud). According to Russian legislation persons who due to mental disorder can not understand the nature of the crime committed against them may not be put to trial. In such cases pretrial forensic psychiatric assessment must give a conclusion about capacity of a victim to give evidence. The study has revealed that the competence to stand trial is determined by severity of symptoms. The relation between psychopathologial symptoms and types of victimological behavior was revealed. Light symptoms determined psychological mechanism with provocative type of victim's behavior. In such cases victims could understand the nature of crime and give the evidence. Moderate and severe symptoms determined psychopathological mechanism and significant victimization of the patients with passive and aggressive types of behavior. Those victims could not understand the meaning of the crime and give evidence.

Conclusion

If the court decides that victim not competent to stand trial it can reduce revictimization of the patients avoiding traumatic experience of giving evidence in the court.

Type
Forensic psychiatry
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2010
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.