Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:18:18.263Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P01-325 - Science and Religion Two Obligatory Poles in the Formation of the Normal Personality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

V. Enatescu*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry Acute Cases, County Hospital Satu Mare, Satu Mare, Romania

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Informational models of the levels of the psychic constitute a methodology of access to the scientific research and understanding. In this system are accepted two types of thinking: mystical-religious and pragmatic-scientific. This two models of thinking are totally different as mechanism but them presence is strict necessary for the reliability of the behavior. It doesn’t exist any scientific argument that can modify the religious beliefs determined by revelation, education, and formation. The scientific knowledge cannot be religious motivated. Both systems are necessary for the normality and unfortunately them mixture in some kinds of hybrids of knowledge do not add a value of efficiency or utility.

Correctly, we can talk about a typology of personality culturally determined. Or, every culture is based on some religious myth and beliefs.

Extraordinary is the observation that the real men of science and of culture are religious, belong to a religion and the atheism is specific to the educational and formational lack.

It is interesting how some deviations that lead to fanatics and are in contradiction with the religious principles specific to the populations lead to disharmonic structures and aberrant behavior (see terrorism, see the roots of xenophobia)

The paperwork is a debate on large of the forming of the personality from the cultural anthropological point of view with an informational approach of the game of significations.

Type
Cultural psychiatry
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2010
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.