Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:49:53.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

P0018 - APOE, CYP46, PRNP and PRND: Genetic polymorphisms in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

M. Flirski
Affiliation:
Department of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotic Disorders, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
M. Sieruta
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Pathology and Neuropathology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
T. Sobow
Affiliation:
Department of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotic Disorders, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
P.P. Liberski
Affiliation:
Department of Molecular Pathology and Neuropathology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
I. Kloszewska
Affiliation:
Department of Old Age Psychiatry and Psychotic Disorders, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background:

The only widely confirmed sporadic AD genetic risk factor is carrying the apolipoprotein E ε4 allele. The results of numerous studies on various other genes are highly inconclusive. Genetic studies in mild cognitive impairment (MCI) are scarce.

Objective:

To assess the influence of APOE, CYP46, PRNP, PRND genetic polymorphisms on the risk of AD and MCI.

Material & Methods:

To date, over 100 subjects with AD, amnestic form of MCI and cognitively healthy age-matched controls have been recruited for the study (ongoing recruitment). To increase the homogeneity of the studied population subjects with prominent comorbid vascular risk factors, family history of dementia or satisfying criteria for non-AD neurodegenerative dementias have been excluded from the study. RFLP and sequencing techniques were employed to assess polymorphic sites in the CYP46, PRNP, PRND and APOE genes.

Results:

As expected, the proportion of APOE ε4 carriers was significantly higher in the AD group compared to controls. No statistically significant influence of polymorphisms in the CYP46, PRNP and PRND genes on the risk of AD or MCI was observed. However, the odds ratio for PRNP codon 129 homozygosity was over fivefold higher in the AD group compared to other study groups.

Conclusions:

The significance of APOE genotype as an AD risk factor seems to be beyond controversy. The role of other genes putatively involved in the pathobiology of neurodegenerative disorders seems vague at most. Studies on much larger populations are required to estimate true significance of those genetic variants in the etiology of AD.

Type
Poster Session II: Alzheimer Disease and Dementia
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2008
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.