Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:45:25.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How is Evaluated Mental Health Recovery?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

P. Penas ,
M.C. Moreno ,
J.J. Uriarte ,
P. Ridgway  and
I. Iraurgi
P. Penas
Affiliation:
University of Deusto, Department of Personality- Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Bilbao, Spain
M.C. Moreno
Affiliation:
Osakidetza, Mental Health Services Organization of Bizkaia, Bilbao, Spain
J.J. Uriarte
Affiliation:
Osakidetza, Mental Health Services Organization of Bizkaia, Bilbao, Spain
P. Ridgway
Affiliation:
Independent Scholar, Research Consultant, Wichita, USA
I. Iraurgi
Affiliation:
University of Deusto, Department of Personality- Assessment and Psychological Treatment, Bilbao, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

There is an increasingly recognition of the concept of recovery in the treatment of mental illness. Recovery defined as living a fulfilling, rewarding life, even in the ongoing presence of a mental illness. Consequently, a number of instruments have been designed to assess recovery-oriented outcomes.

Objective

The objective of the study was to conduct a systematic revision of the instruments used to assess recovery with appropriate psychometric properties.

Method

A systematic review of the literature has been realized. The adequacy of the instruments utilization, the content validity and psychometrics properties were gathered and analyzed.

Results/discussion

After a systematic review, it has been obtained 25 different instruments for measuring personal recovery and 17 for assessing the orientation of recovery in mental health services. As a consequence of the lack of consensus that exists in the conceptualization of recovery; several instruments have been developed and used to assess the different recovery domains. But it is essential to select scales that match with the recovery model and assess adequately the individual's recovery, and also, the recovery orientation of services. Moreover, those instruments should have appropriate psychometric properties and should be suitable to be introduced in routinely clinical settings.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
e-Poster walk: Schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders–part 2
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 41 , Issue S1: Abstract of the 25th European Congress of Psychiatry , April 2017 , pp. S199
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2017
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.