Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:04:58.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effectiveness of Group Psychoeducation On Psychiatric Inpatients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

G. Mattei
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Diagnostic Medicine and Public Health, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
F. Raisi
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Diagnostic Medicine and Public Health, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
M. Burattini
Affiliation:
Mental Health Department, AUSL Modena, Modena, Italy
S. Ferrari
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Diagnostic Medicine and Public Health, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
G. Galeazzi
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Diagnostic Medicine and Public Health, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
F. Mazzi
Affiliation:
Mental Health Department, AUSL Modena, Modena, Italy
L. Pingani
Affiliation:
Human Resource Development, AUSL Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
F. Starace
Affiliation:
Mental Health Department, AUSL Modena, Modena, Italy
P. Vallone
Affiliation:
Mental Health Department, AUSL Modena, Modena, Italy
M. Rigatelli
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Diagnostic Medicine and Public Health, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

In recent years, psychoeducational interventions involving inpatients have been steadily increasing, in Italy. Yet, few studies were carried on to assess their effectiveness in preventing relapse and rehospitalization.

Aims

To assess the effectiveness of group psychoeducation on inpatients and ward atmosphere.

Methods

Case-control study, involving psychiatric inpatients. Cases: patients who attended group psychoeducation during hospital stay. Controls: patients who did not attend group psychoeducation during hospital stay. Time-to-relapse in a 6-months' fixed follow-up was studied with Cox-regressions. Ward atmosphere was recorded by nurses using an ad hoc scale developed by the Italian Istituto Superiore di Sanità, and compared with Wilcoxon's test. Statistics performed with STATA 13.0

Results

Total sample: 82 patients, 55% women. 39 cases, mean age 42 (±13.32), 53.85% women. 43 controls, mean age 45 (±12.84), 55.81% women. No significant differences emerged in the two groups' features, that differed only by exposure to psychoeducation. Survival analysis showed no significant differences between cases (exposed to psychoeducation) and controls (not exposed) concerning time to relapse (Hazard Ratio 0.59, 95%CI: 0.13-2.75). Median ward atmosphere when patients attended the group was not different than when they did not attend it (p=0.17). Most of patients attending psychoeducation reported at discharge to have found it 'useful', they would 'attend it in the future again', and 'group topics were not difficult'.

Conclusions

It is not possible to say if group psychoeducation was protective against relapse after hospital discharge or not. Yet, patients' positive feedbacks encourage further research on it.

Type
Article: 1656
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2015
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.