Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:02:14.533Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards EU Sexual Risk Regulation: Restrictions on Blood Donation as Infringement of Active Citizenship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Uladzislau Belavusau
Uladzislau Belavusau*
Affiliation:
European Law at the T.M.C. Asser Institute (The Hague) - University of Amsterdam
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Case C-528/13, Léger v. Ministre des Affaires sociales, de la Santé et des Droits des femmes; Établissement français du sang [2015] ECLI: EU:C:2015:288 (Fourth Chamber).

In the case of Léger commented on, the Court of Justice of the European Union dealt with a blanket ban on blood donation for men who had sexual relations with other men (MSM) in France. The Court found that such restrictions can be justified in light of specific epidemiological context and scientific knowledge available in Member States. The judgment, therefore, sheds lights on the boundaries of public health justifications, discrimination of gay and bisexual individuals, as well as the rising scope of EU sexual risk regulation. The present annotation argues that the Court has undermined the principle of non-discrimination and shows how the matter of blood donations should have been treated instead as a prerequisite of active sexual citizenship.

“[T]he sanguine substance is intimately tied to both identity and public culture. Blood is a metaphor of life and of death; it fosters insider and outsider relations; it has economic clout and emblematic significance; these primal fluids are far from natural, organic, or self-evident, being imbued with cultural connotations reflecting imagined connectedness, tentative securities and demonstrable anxieties.”

Jefrey A. Bennet

Type
Case Notes
Information
European Journal of Risk Regulation , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 801 - 809
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1- Bennett, Jeffrey A., Banning Queer Blood: Rhetorics of Citizenship, Contagion, and Resistance (Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2009), at p. ix Google Scholar.

2- Case C-528/13, Léger v. Ministre des Affaires sociales, de la Santé et des Droits des femmes; Établissement français du sang [2015] ECLI: EU:C:2015:288.

3- Arrêté du 12 janvier 2009 fixant les critères de sélection des donneurs de sang, Ministère de la Sanlé et des Sports, available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jo_pdf.do?numJO=0&dateJO=20090118&numTexte=23&pageDebut=01067&pageFin=01076

4- Belavusau, Uladzislau, “EU Sexual Citizenship: Sex Beyond the Internal Market”, in Kochenov, Dimitry (ed.), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge: CUP, 2017 – forthcoming)Google Scholar, also available as Belavusau, Uladzislau, “EU Sexual Citizenship: Sex Beyond the Internal Market”, EUI Law Working Papers 6, 2015 Google Scholar.

5- The scope of other accounts of this case in literature has been limited mostly to the LGBT aspects of Léger, see Tryfonidou, Alina, “The Leger Ruling As Another Example of the ECJ’s Disappointingly Reticent Approach to the Protection of the Rights of LGB Persons under EU Law”, 1 European Law Review 2016, pp. 91–104 Google Scholar; Pelosi, Yehudi, “L’exclusion permanente de tout homme homosexuel et bisexuel du don de sang à l’épreuve du droit de l’Union européenne”, Revue des droits de l’homme 2015 (online journal)Google Scholar; Dunne, Peter, A Right to Donate Blood? Permanent Deferrals for “Men Who Have Sex with Men” (MSM): Léger, 52 Common Market Law Review 2015, pp. 1661–1678 Google Scholar.

6- For a wider account, see Alemanno, Alberto, “Science and EU Risk Regulation: The Role of Experts in Decision-Making and Judicial Review”, in Vos, Ellen (ed.), European Risk Governance: Its Science, Its Inclusiveness and Its Effectiveness, Connex Report Series, 2008 Google Scholar; Weimer, Maria and Pisani, Gaia, “Expertise as Justification - the Contested Legitimation of the EU Risk Administration”, in Weimer, Maria and de Ruijter, Anniek (eds.), Regulating Risks in the European Union - The Co-Production of Expert and Executive Power (Oxford: Hard, 2017 - forthcoming)Google Scholar.

7- Sarat, Austin and Kearn, Thomas (eds.), Identities, Politics, and Rights: A Reevaluation of How Rights Liberate and Constrain Human Behavior (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8- On 12 June 2016, a 29-year old security guard, Omar Mateen, killed 49 and wounded 53 people in a shooting attack inside a gay nightclub in Orlando, Florida. See Levin, Sam, “Activists Urge US to End Ban on Gay Men Donating Blood After Orlando Massacre”, The Guardian, 15 June 2016, available at: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/Jun/14/orlando-pulse-shooting-gay-blood-ban-lgbt-rights Google Scholar.

9- For the current position of the FDA, see Revised Recommendations for Reducing the Risk of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Transmission by Blood and Blood Products: Questions and Answers, available at: http://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/BloodBloodProducts/QuestionsaboutBlood/ucm108186.htm.

10- See Stat, Charles Piller, “Blood Donation Restrictions for Gay Men ‘Not Supported by Facts’; AIDS Experts Say”, 13 June 2006, available at: http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/blood-donation-limits-for-gay-men-not-supported-by-facts-aids-experts-say/ Google Scholar.

11- Les conditions de l’ouverture du don de sang aux homosexuels, une « discrimination pure et simple », Le Monde, 5 November 2015, available at: http://www.lemonde.fr/sante/article/2015/11/05/les-associations-partagees-sur-les-conditions-de-l-ouvertu re-du-don-du-sang-aux-homosexuels_4803440_1651302. html.

12- “Arrêté du 12 janvier 2009 fixant les critères de sélection des donneurs de sang, Ministère de la Sanlé et des Sports”, available at: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/jo_pdf.do?numJO=0&dateJO=20090118&numTexte=23&pageDebut=01067&pageFin=01076.

13- Commission Directive 2004/33/EC of 22 March 2004 implementing Directive 2002/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards certain technical requirements for blood and blood components.

14- Point 2.1 of Annex III to Directive 2004/33/EC. In the French version of this Annex, both permanent deferral (point 2.1.) and temporary deferral (point 2.2.2.) apply to persons whose sexual behaviour puts them at “risk” of acquiring diseases transmitted by blood. However, in some language versions of this instrument, while temporary deferral requires the presence of “risk”, permanent deferral requires a “high risk”. That is the case, in particular, in the Danish (stor risiko), English (high risk), Italian (alto risico), Dutch (groot risico) and Polish (wysokie ryzyko) versions of those provisions. Yet in other language versions, points 2.1. and 2.2.2. both refer to “high risk”, as in Spanish (alto resgo) and German (hohes Risiko). The Court found it logical that applicable criteria to permanent and temporary deferral must be different, despite the discrepancy amongst language versions (para. 36 in the Judgment).

15- CaseC-528/13 Léger, supra note 2, at para. 44.

16- CaseC-528/13 Léger, supra note 2, at para. 45.

17- CaseC-528/13 Léger, supra note 2, at para. 52.

18- CaseC-528/13 Léger, supra note 2, at para. 64.

19- CaseC-528/13 Léger, supra note 2, at para. 65.

20- CaseC-528/13 Léger, supra note 2, at para. 66.

21- Schwarz, Hans Peter and Dorner, Friedrich, “Karl Landsteiner and His Major Contributions to Haematology”, British Journal of Haematology 121(4), 2003, pp. 556–565 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

22- Chauveau, Sophie, “The Contaminated Blood Affair in France: A Turning Point in Blood Donation”, in Charbonneau, Johanne and Smith, André (eds.), Giving Blood: The Institutional Making of Altruism (London: Routledge, 2016), pp. 71–88 Google Scholar.

23- Rabinow, Paul, French DNA: Trouble in Purgetory, (Chicago: The Union of Chicago Press, 1999), at p. 84 Google Scholar.

24- Chauveau, Sophie, “The Contaminated Blood Affair in France: A Turning Point in Blood Donation”, in Charbonneau, Johanne and Smith, André (eds.), Giving Blood: The Institutional Making of Altruism (London: Routledge, 2016), pp. 71–88. (at p. 77)Google Scholar.

25- Chauveau, Sophie, “The Contaminated Blood Affair in France: A Turning Point in Blood Donation”, in Charbonneau, Johanne and Smith, André (eds.), Giving Blood: The Institutional Making of Altruism (London: Routledge, 2016), pp. 71–88. (at p. 77)Google Scholar.

26- See Wharton, Steve, “AIDS”, in Hughes, Alexandra and Reader, Keith (eds.), Encyclopedia of Contemporary French Culture (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 9–10 Google Scholar.

27- The incidence rate of HIV and AIDS in France was several times greater than that of Germany and the U.K.

28- Three former ministers, including the Prime Minister, were accused of manslaughter (homicide involontaire) for their decisions and non-decisions during 1985. More than 30 experts, doctors and government advisors have been under legal inquiry since 1995, most of them for poisoning. See Froguel, Philippe and Smajda, Catherine, “Les dessous de l’affair du sang contaminé”, Le Monde Diplomatique (1999), pp. 27 et sqq. Google Scholar

29- Wharton, Steve, “AIDS”, in Hughes, Alexandra and Reader, Keith (eds.), Encyclopedia of Contemporary French Culture (London: Routledge, 1998), pp. 9–10 Google Scholar.

30- Chauveau, Sophie, “The Contaminated Blood Affair in France: A Turning Point in Blood Donation”, in Charbonneau, Johanne and Smith, André (eds.), Giving Blood: The Institutional Making of Altruism (London: Routledge, 2016), pp. 71–88 (at pp. 77-78)Google Scholar.

31- Steffen, Monika, “Risk and Crisis Management in France: The HIV/Blood Case”, contribution to the ECPR Workshop in Mannheim (March 1999), p. 3, available at: https://ecpr.eu/Filestore/PaperProposal/3e29504d-669b-4a57-8261-22785b08d809.pdf Google Scholar. See also Kramer, Jane, “Bad Blood”, The New Yorker (11 October 1993)Google Scholar; Feldman, Eric A. and Bayer, Ronald (eds.), Blood Feuds: AIDS, Blood and the Politics of Medical Disaster (Oxford: OUP, 1999)Google Scholar.

32- Just in the past 10 years, the FDA has changed its recommendations for donor deferral several times. The latest changes came in November 2014. According to this latest version, the 12-month deferral since the most recent sexual contact with another man is prescribed, inter alia, for MSM. Likewise, a recommendation is made to defer for 12 months since the most recent contact a female who has had sex in the past 12 months with a man who has had sex with another man in the past 12 months. For summary, seehttp://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/BloodBloodProducts/QuestionsaboutBlood/ucm108186.htm.

33- Ahmed, Aziza, “‘Rugged Vaginas’ and ‘Vulnerable Rectums’: The Sexual Identity, Epidemiology, and Law of the Global HIV Epidemic”, Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 26(1), 2013, at p. 25 Google Scholar. At the time epidemiologists isolated and promoted anal sex as the key mode of transmission of HIV amongst gay men. The vagina, to the contrary, was seen as a much stronger barrier for HIV infection to enter the body.

34- Berkowitz, Eric, The Boundaries of Desire: A Century of Bad Laws, Good Sex, and Changing Identities (Berkeley: Counerpoint, 2015), at p. 101 Google Scholar.

35- Meyer, Ilan H. and Northridge, Mary E., The Health of Sexual Minorities: Public Health Perspectives on LGBT Populations (New York: Springer, 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36- About emancipation of various LGBT causes via EU law, see Belavusau, Uladzislau and Kochenov, Dimitry, “Federalizing Legal Opportunities for LGBT Movements”, in Slootmaeckers, Koen et al. (eds.), The EU Enlargement and Gay Politics (Palgrave, 2016), pp. 69–96 Google Scholar.

37- Ahmed, Aziza, “’Rugged Vaginas’ and ‘Vulnerable Rectums’: The Sexual Identity, Epidemiology, and Law of the Global HIV Epidemic”, Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 26(1), 2013, p. 1–57 Google Scholar. According to Ahmed, this attitude, inter alia, masks our understanding of HIV transmission, excludes individuals who do not fit neatly into identity-demarcated territory, and deradicalises HIV activism (p. 6). She refers to the continued engagement with rights claiming and epidemiological ideas on vulnerability, through which identity categories reproduce themselves - identity/risk narrative.

38- E.g. in the United States 44% (19,540) of estimated new HIV diagnoses in 2014 were among African Americans, who comprise only 12% of the US population. See Center for Disease Control and Protection, HIV Surveillance Report, 26, 2014, available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/library/reports/surveillance/cdc-hiv-surveillance-report-us.pdf. See also McCree, Donna Hubbard, Jones, Kenneth Terrill, O’Leary, Ann (eds.), African Americans and HIV/AIDS: Understanding and Addressing the Epidemic (New York: Springer, 2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39- Baggaley, Rebecca, White, Richard and Boily, Marie-Claude, “HIV Transmission Risk Through Anal Intercouse: Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Implications for HIV Prevention”, International journal of Epidemiology, 39(4), 2010, pp. 1048–63 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Jon, Janson F. et al., “Per-Contact Probability of HIV Transmission in Homosexual Men in Sydney”, AIDS, 24(6) 2010, pp. 207–13 Google Scholar. The factors that can increase risk include higher viral load, SSTIs, some vaginal conditions, tearing and abrasions, menstruation and other bleeding. Factors that can decrease risk include, inter alia, lower viral load, PEP (post-exposure therapy) and PrEP (preexposure therapy), circumcision and lubrification.

40- Sayare, Scott, “Amid Much Tumult, France Approves ‘Marriage for All’”, The New York Times (23 April 2013), available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/24/world/europe/france-approves-same-sex-marriage.html?_r=0 Google Scholar.

41- Samuel, Henry, “France to Lift Blood Donation for Gay Men”, Telegraph (4 November 2015), available at: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/11974746/France-to-lift-blood-donation-ban-on-gay-men.html Google Scholar.

42- Véran, Oliver, Rapport: La filiere du sang en France, (July 2013) available at: http://social-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/Rapport_Veran_filiere-sang.pdf Google Scholar.

43- Avis no. 123, Questionnement éthique et observations concernant la contre-indication permanente du don de sang pour tout homme déclarant avoir eu une ou des relation(s) sexuelle(s) avec un ou plusieurs homme(s) (2002), available at: http://www.ccne-ethique.fr/sites/default/files/publications/avis_ndeg123.pdf.

44- Ibid.

45- “Les conditions de l’ouverture du don de sang aux homosexuels, une « discrimination pure et simple »”, Le Monde, 5 November 2015, available at: http://www.lemonde.fr/sante/article/2015/11/05/les-associations-partagees-sur-les-conditions-de-l-ouverture-du-don-du-sang-aux-homosexuels_4803440_1651302. html.

46- On the general rise of risk regulation in EU law, see Alemanno, Alberto, EU Risk Regulation: Towards a European Government of Health, Safety and Environmental Risks (Oxford: Hart, 2017)Google Scholar. Risk regulation is becoming a new lens through which to analyse the European integration process.

47- Initially Directive 89/38/EEC.

48- Directive 2002/98/EC and the relevant implementing Directives 2004/33/EC, 2005/6/EC and 2005/62/EC.

49- For recent critique, see de Kort, Wim et al., “Blood Donor Selection in European Union Directives: Room for Improvement”, Blood Transfus, 14(2), 2016, pp. 101–108 Google Scholar. For a wide overview of the EU instruments in the area, see C-C/EAHC-EU Commission-EU Overview of the Landscape of Blood and Plasma / Creative Ceutical Executive Report Revised by the Commission to Include the Stakeholders’ comments, 2015, available at:http://ec.europa.eu/health/blood_tissues_organs/docs/20150408_cc_report_en.pdf.

50- Blutsicherheitsgesetz, 1999, para. 8(9).

51- C-421/09, Humanplasma [2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:760.

52- Hervey, Tamara K. and McHale, Jean V., European Union Health Law: Themes and Implications (Cambridge: CUP, 2015), at p. 115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar. In its reasoning, the CJEU relied in part on the fact that blood safety Directive 2002/98/EC permits reimbursement of donors’ expenses and other small tokens of payment.

53- “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Combating HIV/AIDS in the European Union and neighbouring countries, 2009-2013”, COM(2009)569, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_threats/com/aids/docs/com2009_en.pdf.

54- “Action Plan on HIV/AIDS in the EU and Neighbouring Countries 2014-2016”, SWD(2014) 106, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/ health/sti_prevention/docs/ec_hiv_actionplan_2014_en.pdf.

55- Brooks, Megan, “EU Commission Clears Truvada for HIV PrEP”, Medscape (August 2016), available at: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/867828 Google Scholar.

56- Burda, Jason Potter, “PrEP and Our Youth: Implications in Law and Politics”, Columbia Journal of Gender and Law 30(2), 2015, pp. 295–363 Google Scholar.

57- HRA Farma Press Release (January 2015), available at:http://www.hra-pharma.com/userfiles/file/CP/European_commission_release_08012015.pdf.

58- For a major œuvre in this area, see Alemanno, Alberto and Garde, Amandine (eds.), Regulating Lifestyle Risks: The EU, Alcohol, Tobacco and Unhealthy Diets (Cambridge: CUP, 2015)Google Scholar.

59- Spencer, John R. and du Bois-Pedain, Ant (eds.), Freedom and Responsibility in Reproductive Choices (Oxford: Hart, 2006)Google Scholar.

60- Opinion of AG Mengozzi in Case C-528/13 Léger [17 July 2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:2112, at para. 15.

61- Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, Official journal L 303, 02/12/2000 P. 0016 – 0022.

62- Opinion of Advocate General Jääskinen in C-147/98, Jürgen Römerv. Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg [15 July 2010] ECLI:EU:C:2010:425, para. 80, 146, 147.

63- Opinion of AG Mengozzi in Case C-528/13 Léger [17 July 2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:2112,para. 62

64- Belavusau, Uladzislau, “EU Sexual Citizenship: Sex Beyond the Internal Market”, in Kochenov, Dimitry (ed.), EU Citizenship and Federalism: The Role of Rights (Cambridge: CUP, 2017 - forthcoming)Google Scholar, also available as Belavusau, Uladzislau, “EU Sexual Citizenship: Sex Beyond the Internal Market”, EUI Law Working Papers 6, 2015 Google Scholar.

65- Yoshino, Kenji, “The Epistemic Contract of Bisexual Erasure”, Stanford Law Review, 2000 Google Scholar.

66- See my analysis in the case of C-81/12, Asociaţia ACCEPT [2013], in Belavusau, Uladzislau, “A Penalty Card for Homophobia from EU Non-Discrimination Law”, Columbia journal of European Law 21(2), 2015, pp. 237–259 Google Scholar.

67- See also para. 50 in the Opinion of AG Mengozzi in Case C-528/13 Léger [17 July 2014] ECLI:EU:C:2014:211.

68- Johnson, Christopher H. et al. (eds.), Blood and Kinship: Matter for Metaphor from Ancient Rome to the Present (Bergham Books, 2013)Google Scholar.

69- Anidjar, Gil, Blood: A Critique of Christianity (New York: Columbia University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

70- Bauböck, Rainer et al. (eds.), Acquisition and Loss of Nationality: Comparative Analysis (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

71- Schmitt, Carl, The Concept of the Political, as cited in Anidjar, Gil, Blood: A Critique of Christianity (New York: Columbia University Press, 2014), at p. VIII Google Scholar.

72- Klesse, Christian, The Spectre of Promiscuity: Gay Male and Bisexual Non-Monogamies and Polyamories (London: Routledge, 2007)Google Scholar.