Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T12:27:18.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

“Better Regulation Yes – De-regulation No.”: A Trade Union's Perspective on the Regulatory Reform Agenda in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Sarah Veale*
Affiliation:
Equality and Employment Rights Department of the UK Trades Union Congress

Extract

Good regulation is essential, to protect employees, consumers and the public, as well as the environment. To argue that the market should be allowed to be the determinant of working conditions, together with a bit of exhortation to employers to behave decently, is to accept the Victorian approach that allowed children to work in coal mines.

The massive problems in the finance sector recently also show only too well the impact of weak regulation and de-regulation.

That said, Governments do not always get it right when they do regulate and there is undoubtedly some regulation that is no longer necessary, or is out of date, or is over-complicated or hard to enforce. Neither have Governments showed themselves to be very good at assessing public risk or balancing public health and environment protection with innovation and growth. As the former Risk and Regulation Advisory Council suggested, risk is often assessed through the prism of media sensationalism, political point scoring, civil service attachment to legislation and “risk mongers” such as insurance companies that have a vested interest in talking up risk.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)