Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:17:05.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards evidence-based discussion on surveillance: A Rejoinder to Richard A. Epstein

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2016

Martin Scheinin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

data protectionprivacyEUUS
Type
Case Comments
Information
European Constitutional Law Review , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , September 2016 , pp. 341 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ECJ 6 October 2015, Case C-362/14, Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner.

2 <www.politico.eu/article/the-phone-call-that-saved-safe-harbor-john-kerry-frans-timmermans/>, visited 22 June 2016.

3 <arstechnica.co.uk/tech-policy/2016/02/interview-safe-harbour-2-0-will-lose-again-argues-max-schrems/>, visited 22 June 2016.

4 <verfassungsblog.de/the-essence-of-privacy-and-varying-degrees-of-intrusion/>, visited 22 June 2016.

5 <surveille.eui.eu>, visited 22 June 2016: Surveillance: Ethical Issues, Legal Limitations, and Efficiency, grant agreement no. 284725, for the period 1 February 2012 to 30 June 2015. The reader is instructed, in particular, to consult the SURVEILLE Briefing Note and SURVEILLE deliverable D4.10, both available on the project website. Work towards proper academic publications is in progress.