Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:39:03.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the carrier state of cattle exposed to foot-and-mouth disease virus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

R. Burrows
R. Burrows
Affiliation:
The Animal Virus Research Institute, Pirbright, Surrey
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Cattle infected with FMDV strains of different epizootiological origin developed a carrier state which persisted in the majority of animals for several months. Fluid samples taken from the oesophageal/pharyngeal region were assayed for infectivity by plaque counts on BHK monolayer cultures and by mouse inoculation. With one strain of virus, infectivity levels of up to 1000 pfu/ml. were recorded for several weeks after infection but in general the virus content of samples was below 50 pfu/ml.

The sites of virus persistence and multiplication were identified by titration of suspensions of mucosae and epithelia taken post mortem. Virus was recovered from 41 of 54 cattle killed 14–196 days after infection. The chief sites of virus multiplication based on the frequency of virus recovery and infectivity titres were the dorsal surface of the soft palate and the pharynx. Virus was recovered less frequently from the ventral surface of the soft palate and the glosso-epiglottic space and only occasionally from the tonsillar sinuses, tonsils, tongue, trachea and oesophagus. No virus was detected in the turbinates or in the epithelium of the urinary bladder.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 64 , Issue 1 , March 1966 , pp. 81 - 90
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1966

References

REFERENCES

Cottral, G. E., Gailiunas, P. & Campion, R. L. (1963). Detection of foot-and-mouth disease virus in lymph nodes of cattle throughout course of infection. Proc. U.S. live Stk sanit. Ass. 67, 463.Google Scholar
Galloway, I. A. (1962). Results of the use of two live attenuated strain vaccines, Rho. 1 (SAT 2 type) and RV. 11 (SAT 1 type), in controlling outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease. Bull. Off. int. Epizoot. 57, 748.Google Scholar
Henderson, W. M. (1952). A comparison of different routes of inoculation of cattle for detection of the virus of foot-and-mouth disease. J. Hyg., Camb., 50, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hyslop, N. St G. (1965). Secretion of foot-and-mouth disease virus and antibody in the saliva of infected and immunized cattle. J. comp. Path. 75, 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kärber, G. (1931). Beìtrag zur kollektiven Behandlung pharmakologischer Reihenversuche. Arch. exp. Path. Pharmak. 162, 480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, W. B. & Chapman, W. G. (1961). The tissue culture test for assaying the virus and neutralizing antibody of foot-and-mouth disease and its application to the measurement of immunity in cattle. Res. vet. Sci. 2, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowat, G. N. & Chapman, W. G. (1962). Growth of foot-and-mouth disease virus in a fibroblastic cell line derived from hamster kidneys. Nature, Lond., 194, 253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisson, S. & Grossman, J. D. (1945). The Anatomy of the Domestic Animals. Philadelphia and London: W. B. Saunders Co.Google Scholar
Sutmöller, P. & Gaggero, A. (1965). Foot-and-mouth disease carriers. Vet. Rec. 77, 968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Bekkum, J. G., Frenkel, H. S., Frederiks, H. H. J. & Frenkel, S. (1959). Observations on the carrier state of cattle exposed to foot-and-mouth disease virus. Tijdschr. Diergeneesk. 84, 1159.Google Scholar