Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T15:46:13.750Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Plague among Ground Squirrels in America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

George W. McCoy
Affiliation:
Passed Assistant Surgeon, U. S. Public Health and Marine-Hospital Service, U. S. Plague Laboratory, San Francisco, California.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The United States has been fortunate in never having had any extensive epidemics of plague. With the exception of a few cases, not over a dozen, that are directly chargeable to the infection of the indigenous rodents (ground squirrels), the disease has been confined to the two largest and most important cities on the Pacific Coast, San Francisco and Seattle. In each city the disease has yielded promptly to vigorous sanitary measures carried out by the public health arm of the Federal Government. Under the political organization of the Government, direct control of measures for the suppression of a disease is taken by the central sanitary authority only when a request is made by the local authorities, but it has been the experience that local authorities are prompt to make requests for assistance whenever any serious epidemic appears.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1910

References

REFERENCES

(1)Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. v. No. 5, pp. 485506, December 18th, 1908; also Journ. of Hygiene, Vol. ix. pp. 1—8, April, 1909.Google Scholar
(2)Public Health Reports, Vol. xxiii. No. 37, pp. 12891923, September 11th, 1908.Google Scholar
(3)Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. vi. No. 5, pp. 670675, November, 1909.Google Scholar
(4)Journal of Infectious Diseases, Vol. vi. No. 5, pp. 676687, November, 1909.Google Scholar
(5)Public Health Reports, Vol. xxv. No. 19, pp. 623, 624, May 13th, 1910.Google Scholar