Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:30:00.935Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mosquito-borne infections in Fiji V. The 1971–73 dengue epidemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

T. Maguire ,
J. A. R. Miles ,
F. N. Macnamara ,
P. J. Wilkinson ,
F. J. Austin  and
J. U. Mataika
T. Maguire
Affiliation:
Virus Research Unit and Department of Microbiology, Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
J. A. R. Miles
Affiliation:
Virus Research Unit and Department of Microbiology, Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
F. N. Macnamara
Affiliation:
Virus Research Unit and Department of Microbiology, Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
P. J. Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Virus Research Unit and Department of Microbiology, Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
F. J. Austin
Affiliation:
Virus Research Unit and Department of Microbiology, Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
J. U. Mataika
Affiliation:
Wellcome Virus Laboratory, Colonial War Memorial Hospital, Suva, Fiji
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A dengue epidemic due to type 2 virus involving some 3,400 cases began in Fiji early in 1971, had a peak during May, June and July, and cases have continued to occur with a low incidence during 1972 and 1973. Many of the notified cases showed classical dengue fever symptoms and there were no confirmed cases of haemorrhagic fever. A serological survey indicated that there had been at least 20,000 subclinical infections. It is probable that the virus was introduced to Fiji either through the port of Lautoka or Nadi international airport in February 1971. The normal travel patterns of residents must have spread the virus to all the more accessible localities but, with the exception of Rotuma, it caused infections only in areas where Aedes aegypti was available as a vector. There was no evidence that pre-existing dengue type 1 serum antibody gave any protection during this epidemic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 73 , Issue 2 , October 1974 , pp. 263 - 270
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

References

REFERENCES

Clarke, D. H. & Casals, J. (1958). Techniques for haemagglutination and haemagglutination-inhibition with arthropod-borne viruses. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 7, 561–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, D. H. & Casals, J. (1965). In Viral and Rickettsial Infections of Man, 4th ed., p. 619. Ed. Horsfall, F. L. and Tamm, I.. Lippincott: Philadelphia and Montreal.Google Scholar
Likosky, W. H., Calisher, C. H., Michelsen, A. L., Correa-Coronas, R., Henderson, B. E. & Feldman, R. A. (1973). An epidemiologic study of dengue type 2 in Puerto Rico 1969. American Journal of Epidemiology 97, 264–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, T., Macnamara, F. N., Miles, J. A. R., Spears, G. F. S. & Mataika, J. U. (1971). Mosquito-borne infections in Fiji. II. Arthropod-borne virus infections. Journal of Hygiene 69, 287–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, I. D. & Hawkes, R. A. (1972). Dengue in the Pacific. Medical Journal of Australia ii, 1320–21.Google Scholar
Miles, J. A. R., Maguire, T., Austin, F. J., Ross, R. W. & Ordish, R. (1964). Evidence of arbovirus infections in Fiji. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 13, 327–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreau, J. P., Rosen, L., Saugrain, J. & Lagraulet, J. (1973). An epidemic of dengue on Tahiti associated with haemorrhagic manifestations. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 22, 237–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar