Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-17T21:20:50.360Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Impetigo Contagiosa, its Epidemiology and Control

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

J. L. Newman
Affiliation:
Late Assistant Medical Officer of Health, Southampton
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The infectious fevers have, during the last fifty years, been the subject of much epidemiological research, and have thus been made to yield up secrets which have materially affected the whole outlook of preventive medicine. But there yet remains for exploration a vast adjacent territory, that of minor coccal infections of the skin. However, whereas the former, being clearly defined clinically and in many cases subject to compulsory notification, lend themselves well to investigations of this sort, Impetigo, as a type of minor coccal dermatitis, surrounds itself with dificulties. For not only does it vary very much in its appearances by the time it is first seen but it is often of so little severity that it does not come under the observation of a physician at all, so that the influence of missed cases, always an important factor to be reckoned with in the study of epidemics, may assume such proportions as to give quite an erroneous impression of the total incidence of the disease. Consequently the epidemic aspects of impetigo have as yet received very little attention.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1935

References

Atwater, R. M. (1927). Amer. J. Hygiene, 7, 362.Google Scholar
Colebrook, L. (1933). Brit. Med. J. II, 725.Google Scholar
Duhring, L. A. (1898). Cutaneous Medicine, 2, 421. Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Fox, Tilbury (1864). Brit. Med. J. 78.Google Scholar
Fox, Tilbury (1873). Skin Diseases, 3rd ed. p. 224. London.Google Scholar
Glover, J. A. (1930). Lancet, I, 499.Google Scholar
McLeod, J. M. H. (1933). Diseases of the Skin, p. 298. London.Google Scholar
Percival, G. H. (1929). System of Bacteriology, Med. Res. Counc. 2, 75.Google Scholar
Rolleston, Sir H. D. (1933). Brit. Med. J. I, 500.Google Scholar
Russell, W. T. (1933). J. Hygiene, 33, 421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabouraud, R. (1900). Ann. de Derm, et Syph. 1, 64.Google Scholar
Sequeira, J. H. (1927). Diseases of the Skin, p. 198. London.Google Scholar
Smith, D. T. and Burky, E. L. (1924). Johns Hopk. Hosp. Bull. 35, 78.Google Scholar
Tomkinson, J. G. (1932). Practitioner, 1, 334.Google Scholar
TopleyW, W. C. W, W. C. and Wilson, G. S. (1930). Principles of Bacteriology and Immunology, 2, 784. London.Google Scholar
Watson, T. (1848). Lectures on the Principles and Practice of Physic, 2, 856. London.Google Scholar
Williams, H. C. M. (1933). Ann. Rep. of Sch. M.O.for Southampton, p. 31.Google Scholar