Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:29:45.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect on the Virulence of Bact. aertrycke of Cultivation in Atmospheres Containing Varying Proportions of Oxygen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 May 2009

G. S. Wilson
G. S. Wilson
Affiliation:
(From the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. A given strain of Bact. aertrycke was sub-cultured daily, except on Sundays, in 5–7 c.c. of casein broth, pH 7·4–7·6, under different partial pressures of oxygen. Most experiments were continued till about ninety sub cultures had been made. Virulence determinations were made from time to time by intraperitoneal inoculation of twenty mice with about 100 living organisms, the control and the experimental cultures generally being tested simultaneously. The results showed that under anaerobic conditions there was no appreciable change in virulence. Under the usual aerobic conditions, and in partial pressures of oxygen varying from 1 to 21 per cent., the virulence declined, the extent and rapidity of the fall increasing with the pressure of oxygen supplied. In high partial pressures of oxygen, varying from 40 to 100 per cent., there was a slight increase in virulence, the increase being greatest in cultures incubated in pure oxygen.

2. Some of the literature dealing with incitants to microbic dissociation is discussed, particularly that dealing with variations in oxygen pressure.

3. In explanation of the experimental results obtained, a tentative hypothesis is put forward with reference to the dissociation of Bact. aertrycke. It is suggested that under aerobic conditions, and under low partial pressures of oxygen generally, substances are formed in the medium, as the result of growth, which favour dissociation, and lead to the appearance of weakly virulent or completely avirulent variants. Under anaerobic conditions these substances either are not formed at all, or appear in amounts too small to be of significance. In cultures incubated in high partial pressures of oxygen, these substances are formed, probably in large quantity, but owing to the high alkalinity of the medium and the abundant oxygen present, they undergo rapid destruction. This explanation is based on the fact that many protein degradation products, particularly those with a phenolic grouping, prove markedly unstable in an alkaline medium in the presence of free oxygen.

As an alternative hypothesis it is suggested that the maintenance of the organisms in the virulent state depends on the intracellular pH. Under anaerobic conditions it is supposed that the metabolism is such as to lead to no marked change in the H-ion concentration within the cell. In the presence of air and of low pressures of oxygen generally, owing to the breakdown of the protein in the medium and the production of ammonia, the intracellular reaction becomes more alkaline; whereas in high pressures of oxygen the increased amount of CO2 produced is sufficient to compensate for the production of ammonia, and the intracellular pH remains more or less at its original value. This hypothesis rests on the observation of Stephenson and Whetham (1924) that in high pressures of oxygen Bact. coli may produce considerably larger quantities of CO2 from lactic acid than under ordinary aerobic conditions; and on the demonstration by Jacobs (1920 b) that, owing to the ease with which CO2 is able to penetrate the living cell, the intracellular pH may differ markedly from that of the medium to which the cell is exposed.

4. It is of interest to note that Bact. aertrycke, when incubated under partial pressures of 40 to 75 per cent. of oxygen, rapidly passed into the nonmotile O form.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Hygiene , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , November 1930 , pp. 433 - 467
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1930

References

REFERENCES

Adams, A. (1912). Biochem. J. 6, 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkwright, J. A. (1921). J. Path, and Bact. 24, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkwright, J. A. and Goyle, A. N. (1924). Brit. J. Exp. Path. 5, 104.Google Scholar
Bang, (1897). Zeitschr.f. Thiermed. 1, 241.Google Scholar
Burnet, F. M. (1930). J. Path, and Bact. 33, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, J. A. (1926). J. Physiol. 61, 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, H. H. and Evans, C. L. (1922). J. Physiol. 56, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Krutf, P. H. (1921). J. Exp. Med. 33, 773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Krutf, P. H. (1922 a). J. Exp. Med. 35, 561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Krutf, P. H. (1922 b). J. Exp. Med. 35, 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eyre, J. W. and Washbourn, J. W. (1897). J. Path, and Bact. 4, 394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Felton, L. D. and Dougherty, , Katharine, M. (1924). J. Exp. Med. 39, 137, 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1928). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh and London, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Griffith, F. (1923). Rept. on Pub. Health and Med. Subjects, Ministry of Health, London, No. 18.Google Scholar
Hadley, P. (1927). J. Infect. Dis. 40, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haffkine, W. M. (1892). Compt. rend. Soc. Biol. 4, 635, 671.Google Scholar
Huddleson, (1921). Cornell Veterinarian, 11, 210.Google Scholar
Hughes, T. P. (1930). J. Exp. Med. 51, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, M. H. (1920 a). Amer. J. Physiol. 51, 321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, M. H. (1920 a). Amer. J. Physiol. 53, 457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, E. O. (1926). J. Amer. Med. Assoc. 86, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karsner, H. T., Brittingham, H. H. and Richardson, M. L. (1923). J. Med. Res. 44, 83.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, P. P. (1915). Brit. Med. J. 1, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockhart, L. P. (1926). J. Hygiene, 25, 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubinski, W. (1894). Centralbl.f. Bakt. 16, 769.Google Scholar
Moore, B. and Williams, R. S. (1909). Biochem. J. 4, 177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, B. (1911). Biochem. J. 5, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, A; (1912). Arb. a. d. Kais. Gesundht. 38, 294.Google Scholar
Noguchi, H. (1912). J. Exp. Med. 16, 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novy, F. G. and Soule, M. H. (1925). J. Infect. Dis. 36, 168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittman, Margaret, and Falk, I. S. (1930). J. Bact. 19, 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roger, G. H. (1890). Compt. rend. Soc. Biol. 2, 573.Google Scholar
Roux, E. and Yersin, A. (1890). Ann. Inst. Pasteur, 4, 385.Google Scholar
Savage, W. G. and White, P. B. (1925). Med. Res. Council, Spec. Rep. Ser. No. 91, London.Google Scholar
Shousha, A. T. (1923). J. Hygiene, 22, 156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soule, M. H. (1928). J. Infect. Dis. 42, 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephenson, M. and Whetham, M. D. (1924). Biochem. J. 18, 498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stickdorn, W. (1909). Centralbl. f. Bakt. 50, 5.Google Scholar
Todd, E. W. (1928). Brit. J. Exp. Path. 9, 1.Google Scholar
Topley, W. W. C. (1927). J. State Med. 35, 63.Google Scholar
Topley, W. W. C. and Ayrton, Mary J. (1923). J. Hygiene, 22, 234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wadsworth, A. B. and Kirkbride, Mary B. (1918). J. Exp. Med. 28, 791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, L. T. (1924). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. 22, 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, L. T. (1925). J. Exp. Med. 41, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, L. T. (1928). J. Exp. Med. 47, 685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, L. T. and Burn, C. (1926 a). J. Exp. Med. 44, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, L. T. (1926 b). J. Exp. Med. 44, 359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, L. T. (1927). J. Exp. Med. 46, 855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. S. (1922). J. Bact. 7, 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. S. (1926). J. Hygiene, 25, 142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. S. (1928). J. Hygiene, 28, 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. S. (1930 a). J. Hygiene, 30, 40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. S. (1930 b). J. Hygiene, 30, 196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, G. S. (1930 c). Unpublished.Google Scholar
Wosnessenski, J. (1884). Compt. rend. Acad. des. Sci. 98, 314.Google Scholar
Wreschner, H. (1921). Zeitschr.f. Hyg. 93, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, H. D. (1927). J. Path, and Bact. 30, 185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar