Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:50:19.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Heavy-metal Pollution in the Sudbury Mining and Smelting Region of Canada, II. Soil Toxicity Tests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

L. M. Whitby
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto 181, Ontario, Canada.
T. C. Hutchinson
Affiliation:
Department of Botany and Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto 181, Ontario, Canada.

Extract

Soils from the Sudbury region, Canada, which have been contaminated by the heavy metals nickel, copper, cobalt, and iron, from airborne smelter emissions, have been assayed for their toxicity to seedling growth. The extent of radicle elongation in bathing solutions of soil-water extracts has been used as a bioassay index of soil toxicity. The root growth of four species was reduced in extracts of soils which had been collected up to a distance of 49.8 km from the Coniston smelter. Inhibition was greatest in surface soils. Water extracts had metal concentrations of up to 142 ppm Ni, 59.5 ppm Cu, and 4.6 ppm Co. In addition, aluminium occurred in water extracts at 50.6 ppm at 0.8 km from the smelter, and up to 98.9 ppm somewhat farther away, even though it was not smelted in the region.

All of the four metals nickel, copper, cobalt, and aluminium, were shown to be markedly inhibitory to seedling growth at concentrations below 5 ppm. In addition, all of the metals tested were concentrated markedly in the seedlings, expecially in their roots. The concentration factor was often 50- to 100-fold that of the bathing solution. Nickel appears to be the greatest single heavy-metal problem with which the vegetation has to contend. Even in the event that the major emissions of sulphur dioxide in the area be controlled, the concentrations of the toxic heavy metals nickel and copper already existing in the soils over many square kilometres present severe problems for seedling establishment and, consequently, revegetation.

Type
Main Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bateman, W. G. & Wells, L. S. (1917). Copper in the flora of a copper-tailing region. J. Amer. Chem. Soc., 39, pp. 811–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, A. D., Mcneill, T. S. & Gregory, R. P. G. (1965). Industrialization, evolution and the development of heavy-metal tolerance in plants. Pp. 327–43 in Ecology and the Industrial Society (Ed. Goodman, G. T., Edwards, R. W. & Lambert, J. M.). 5th Symp. Brit. Ecol. Soc., Blackwell, Oxford: viii + 395 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Clarkson, D. T. (1968). Metabolic aspects of aluminium toxicity and some possible mechanisms for resistance. Pp. 381–98 in Ecological Aspects of Mineral Nutrition of Plants (Ed. Rorison, I. H.). 9th Symp. Brit. Ecol. Soc, Blackwell, Oxford: xxi + 484 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Costescu, L. M. & Hutchinson, T. C. (1972). The ecological consequences of soil pollution by metallic dust from the Sudbury smelters. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Meeting of the Institute of Environmental Sciences, New York, pp. 540–5.Google Scholar
Dreisinger, B. R. (1970). SO2 Levels and Vegetation Injury in the Sudbury Area During the 1969 Season. Department of Energy and Resources Management, Province of Ontario, Canada, publ. April 1970, 45 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Duvigneaud, P. & Smet, S. D. de (1963). Cuivre et vegetation au Katanga. Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belg., 93, pp. 93231.Google Scholar
Ernst, W. (1968). Der Einfluss der Phosphatversorgung sowie die Wirkung von ionogenem und chelatisiertem Zink auf die Zink-und Phosphataufnahme einiger Schwermetallpflanzen. Physiologia PL., 21, pp. 323–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadgil, R. L. (1969). Tolerance of heavy metals and the reclamation of industrial waste. J. Appl. Ecol., 6, pp. 247–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorham, E. & Gordon, A. G. (1960 a). Some effects of smelter pollution north-east of Falconbridge, Ontario. Can. J. Bot., 38, pp. 307–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorham, E.Gordon, A. G. (1960b). The influence of smelter fumes upon the chemical composition of lake waters near Sudbury, Ontario, and upon the surrounding vegetation. Can. J. Bot., 38, pp. 477–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregory, R. P. G. & Bradshaw, A. D. (1965). Heavy-metal tolerance in populations of Agrostis tenuis Sibth. and other grasses. New Phytol., 64, pp. 131–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, E. G. (1945). Aluminium in soils, plants and animals. Soil Science, 60, pp. 2940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, T. C. (1973). Comparative studies of the phytotoxicity of heavy metals to phytoplankton and their synergistic interactions. Symposium on Water Pollution Research in Canada, 8, pp. 6890.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, T. C. & Whitby, L. M. (1974). Heavy-metal pollution in the Sudbury mining and smelting region of Canada, I. Soil and vegetation contamination by nickel, copper, and other metals. Environmental Conservation, 1(2), pp. 123–32, map.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1958). Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice-Hall, New York: xiv + 498 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Jowett, D. (1958). Populations of Agrostis spp. tolerant of heavy metals. Nature (London), 182, pp. 816–7.Google Scholar
Jowett, D. (1964). Population studies on lead-tolerant Agrostis tenuis. Evolution, 18, p. 70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubota, J. & Allaway, W. H. (1972). Geographic distribution of trace-element problems. Pp. 525–54 in Micronutrients in Agriculture (Ed. Mortvedt, J. J., Giordano, P. M. & Lindsay, W. L.). Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin: xix + 666 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Linzon, S. N. (1972). Effects of sulphur oxides on vegetation. Foresty Chronicle, 48, pp. 182–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, R. E. & Davis, J. F. (1961). Relationships between pH values of organic soils and availabilities of 12 plant nutrients. Soil Science, 92, pp. 177–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mckee, J. E. & Wolf, H. W. (1963). Water Quality Criteria (2nd edn). California State Water Pollution Control Board, Publication No. 3-A, xiv + 548 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Munshower, Frank F. (1972). Cadmium Compartmen-tation and Cycling in a Grassland Ecosystem in the Deer Lodge Valley, Montana. Ph. D. thesis, University of Montana, Missoula: 103 pp., (typescript).Google Scholar
Reuther, W., Smith, P. F. & Specht, A. W. (1952). Accumulation of the major bases and heavy metals in Florida citrus soils in relation to phosphate fertilization. Soil Science, 73, pp. 374–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rorison, I. H. (1960). The calcicole-calcifuge problem. II. The effects of mineral nutrition on seedling growth in solution culture. J. Ecol., 48, pp. 679–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N., Devlin, E. L., Larsen, A. A., Mccausland, E. D. & Saville, J. M. (1971). Lead poisoning in horses. Arch. Environ. Health, 23, pp. 185–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sparling, J. H. (1967). The occurrence of Schoenus nigricans L. in blanket bogs. I. Environmental conditions affecting the growth of S. nigricans in blanket bogs. J. Ecol., 55, pp. 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spence, D. H. N. (1957). Studies on the vegetation of Shetland. I. The serpentine debris vegetation in Unst. J. Ecol., 45, pp. 917–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, M. D. (1965). The effects of air pollution on plants and animals. Pp. 1133 in Ecology and the Industrial Society (Ed. Goodman, G. T., Edwards, R. W. & Lambert, J. M.). 5th Symp. Brit. Ecol. Soc., Blackwell, Oxford: viii + 395 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Wild, H. (1970). Geobotanical anomalies in Rhodesia. 3. The vegetation of nickel-bearing soils. Kirkia, 1, Supplement, pp. 162.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. A. (1957). A technique for the measurement of lead tolerance in plants. Nature (London), 180, pp. 37–8.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. A. (1960). The measurement of genetical analysis of lead tolerance in Festuca ovina. Rep. Scott. PL Breed. Stn, pp. 8598.Google Scholar