Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:09:21.420Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Examination of Developmental Trajectories for Attention Skills in Children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2012

Jenny McKay
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Australia.
Jennifer Betts
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Australia.
Paul Maruff
Affiliation:
CogState Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Australia.
Vicki Anderson*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne, Australia; Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia. [email protected]
*
*Address for correspondence: Dr Vicki Anderson, Psychology Royal Children's Hospital, Flemington Road, Parkville Victoria, 3052, Australia.
Get access

Abstract

The present study aimed to investigate the development of attention skills through middle childhood and to document developmental trajectories associated with tasks of increasing attentional demands. The sample comprised 57 children (aged 5–12 years) who were divided, according to age, into three groups. Performance differences between the groups were compared on two measures, each including four subtests of increasing complexity and tapping both speed and accuracy: CogState, a computerised measure, and The Contingency Naming Test, a paper-and-pencil test. We predicted that there would be: (1) improvements in performance with increasing age, (2) deceases in performance with increasing task complexity and (3) parallel increments in performance on computer-based and paper-and-pencil measures. The results indicated that there were rapid improvements in performance on both computer-based and paper-and-pencil measures between the ages of 5 and 8 years indicated by changes in both response speed and response accuracy. In contrast, more moderate improvements were identified between the ages of 9 to 12 years and occurred mainly in the domain of speed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)