Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:26:06.868Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVISION OF MALESIAN ENDOSPERMUM (EUPHORBIACEAE) WITH NOTES ON PHYLOGENY AND HISTORICAL BIOGEOGRAPHY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2011

S. Arias Guerrero  and
P. C. van Welzen
S. Arias Guerrero
Affiliation:
Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis, section NHN, Leiden University, PO Box 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail for correspondence: [email protected]
P. C. van Welzen
Affiliation:
Netherlands Centre for Biodiversity Naturalis, section NHN, Leiden University, PO Box 9514, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands. E-mail for correspondence: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The genus Endospermum (Euphorbiaceae) in the Malay Archipelago (Malesia) comprises eight rather than the 10 species recognised in the latest revision by Schaeffer in 1971. Endospermum banghamii and E. ronaldii are synonymised with E. quadriloculare. The diagnostic characters for the genus are briefly discussed with special emphasis given to the myrmecophytic characters. The phylogenetic analysis, based on morphological characters (11 vegetative and 12 reproductive), resulted in a single, most parsimonious cladogram with bootstrap support only for the genus. The historical biogeographic analysis, used to evaluate the cladogram, showed that two species are placed in an unexpected position in the phylogeny, which means that the morphology-based cladogram may be reliable to a large extent.

Keywords

BiogeographyEndospermumEuphorbiaceaeMalesiamorphological phylogenytaxonomy
Type
Articles
Information
Edinburgh Journal of Botany , Volume 68 , Issue 3 , November 2011 , pp. 443 - 482
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Airy Shaw, H. K. (1980). The Euphorbiaceae of New Guinea. Kew Bull., Addit. Ser. 8: 1–243.Google Scholar
Backer, C. A. (1936). Verklarend woordenboek der wetenschappelijke namen van de in Nederland en Nederlandsch-Indië in het wild groeiende en in tuinen en parken gekweekte varens en hoogere planten. Groningen: P. Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Bentham, G. (1861). Flora Hongkongensis. London: Lovell Reeve.Google Scholar
Blume, C. L. (1823). Catalogus van ‘s lands plantentuin te Buitenzorg. Batavia: Lands Drukkerij.Google Scholar
Burkill, I. H. (1935). Dictionary of the Economic Products of the Malay Peninsula 1. London: Crown Agents for the Colonies.Google Scholar
Corner, E. J. H. (1939). Notes on the systematics and distribution of Malayan Phanerogams III. Gard. Bull. Straits Settlem. 10: 239–329.Google Scholar
Docters van Leeuwen, W. (1929). Einige Beobachtungen über das Zusammenleben von Camponotus quadriceps F. Smith mit dem Ameisenbaum Endospermum moluccanum Becc. aus Neu-Guinea. Treubia 10: 431–437.Google Scholar
Felsenstein, J. (1985). Confidence-limits on phylogenies – an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiala, B., Maschwitz, U., Pong, T. Y. & Helbig, A. J. (1989). Studies of a South East Asian ant–plant association: protection of Macaranga trees by Crematogaster borneensis. Oecologia 79: 463–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Govaerts, R., Frodin, D. G. & Radcliffe-Smith, A. (2000). World Checklist and Bibliography of Euphorbiaceae 2. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Kodandaramaiah, U. (2010). Use of dispersal-vicariance analysis in biogeography – a critique. J. Biogeogr. 37: 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulju, K. K. M., Sierra, S. E. C., Draisma, S. G. A., Samuel, R. & Van Welzen, P. C. (2007). Molecular phylogeny of Macaranga, Mallotus, and related genera (Euphorbiaceae s.s.): insights from plastid and nuclear DNA sequence data. Amer. J. Bot. 94: 1726–1743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurz, J. (1867). On the Euphorbiaceous genus Capellenia. J. Bot. 5: 23.Google Scholar
Letourneau, D. K. (1999). Ants, stem borers, and pubescence in Endospermum in Papua New Guinea. Biotropica 31: 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, D. R. & Maddison, W. P. (2001). MacClade 4: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, version 4.08. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Pax, F. & Hoffmann, K. (1912). Euphorbiaceae-Gelonieae. In: Engler, A. (ed.) Das Pflanzenreich IV.147.iv, pp. 33–39. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelmann.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Smith, A. (2001). Genera Euphorbiacearum. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens.Google Scholar
Ronquist, F. (1997). Dispersal-vicariance analysis: A new approach to the quantification of historical biogeography. Syst. Biol. 46: 195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronquist, F. (2001). DIVAversion 1.2. Computer program for MacOS and Win32. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University. Available atwww.ebc.uu.se/systzoo/research/diva/diva.htmlGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, J. (1971). Revision of the genus Endospermum Bth. (Euphorbiaceae). Blumea 19: 171–192.Google Scholar
Schot, A. M. (2004). Systematics of Aporosa (Euphorbiaceae). Blumea Suppl. 17: 1–377.Google Scholar
Sevilla, S. & Van Welzen, P. C. (2001). Revision and phylogeny of Agrostistachys and Chondrostylis (Euphorbiaceae). Blumea 46: 71–97.Google Scholar
Sierra, S. E. C., Kulju, K. K. M., Fišer, Ž., Aparicio, M. & Van Welzen, P. C. (2010). The phylogeny of Mallotus s.s. (Euphorbiaceae s.s.) inferred from DNA sequence and morphological data. Taxon 59: 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slik, J. W. F. & Van Welzen, P. C. (2001). A phylogeny of Mallotus (Euphorbiaceae) based on morphology: Indications for a pioneer origin of Macaranga. Syst. Bot. 26: 786–796.Google Scholar
Smith, L. S. (1947). The ligneous genus Endospermum Benth. (Euphorbiaceae) in New Guinea. Proc. Roy. Soc. Queensland 58: 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
So, M. L. (2004). The occurrence of extrafloral nectaries in Hong Kong plants. Bot. Bull. Acad. Sin. 45: 237–245.Google Scholar
Swofford, D. L. (2003). PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), version 4. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Teijsmann, J. E. & Binnendijk, S. (1867). Over een nieuw plantengeslacht behoorende tot de orde der Euphorbiaceen en genaamd Capellenia. Natuurk. Tijdschr. Ned.-Indië 29: 237–239.Google Scholar
Van Welzen, P. C., Turner, H. & Hovenkamp, P. H. (2003). Historical biogeography of Southeast Asia and the West Pacific, or the generality of unrooted area networks as historical biogeographic hypotheses. J. Biogeogr. 30: 181–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, G. L. (1994). Synopsis of the genera and suprageneric taxa of Euphorbiaceae. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 81: 33–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmore, T. C. (1973). Tree Flora of Malaya 2. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Wurdack, K. J., Hoffmann, P. & Chase, M. W. (2005). Molecular phylogenetic analysis of uniovulate Euphorbiaceae (Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto) using plastid rbcL and trnL-F sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 1397–1420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, Y., Harris, A. J. & He, X. J. (2010). S-DIVA (Statistical Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis): a tool for inferring biogeographic histories. Molec. Phylogenet. Evol. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2010.04.011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed