Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T01:25:59.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

REVISION OF SOLANUM SECTION REGMANDRA (SOLANACEAE)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

J. R. Bennett
J. R. Bennett*
Affiliation:
Department of Botany, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. Current address: St Paul's School, Lonsdale Road, London SW13 9JT, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Solanum section Regmandra (Solanaceae), a group of 11 species from the lomas of Chile and Peru, is revised. Two new species are described, Solanum indivisum Witasek ex J.R.Benn. and S. coquimbense J.R.Benn., and a new name, S. trinominum J.R.Benn., is proposed for S. heterantherum Witasek ex Reiche. Two species, Solanum multifidum Lam. and S. edmonstonei Hook.f., are endemic to Peru, seven species are endemic to Chile, and only two species are found in both countries. Descriptions, distribution maps and a key to the species are presented and several species illustrated.

Keywords

ChilelomasPeruSolanaceaeSolanum section Regmandraspecies delimitationtaxonomy
Type
Articles
Information
Edinburgh Journal of Botany , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , March 2008 , pp. 69 - 112
Copyright
Copyright © Trustees of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, D. E. (2004). Edmonston, Thomas (1825–1846). Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bitter, G. (1911). Steinzellkonkretionen im Fruchtfleisch beerentragender Solanaceen und deren systematische Bedeutung. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 45: 483–507.Google Scholar
Bitter, G. (1914). Weitere Untersuchungen über das Vorkommen von Steinzellkonkretionen im Fruchtfleisch beerentragender Solanaceen. Abh. Naturwiss. Vereine Bremen 23: 114–163.Google Scholar
Bohs, L. (1994). Cyphomandra (Solanaceae). Fl. Neotrop. Monogr. 63: 1–175.Google Scholar
Bohs, L. (2005). Major clades in Solanum based on ndhF sequences. In: Keating, R. C., Hollowell, V. C. & Croat, T. B. (eds) A festschrift for William G. D'Arcy: the legacy of a taxonomist. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden, vol. 104, pp. 27–49. St Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
Cavanilles, A. J. (1791–1806). Icones et Descriptiones Plantarum. Madrid.Google Scholar
Cracraft, J. (1983). Species concepts and speciation analysis. Current Ornithology 1: 159–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Arcy, W. G. (1972). Solanaceae studies II: typification of subdivisions of Solanum. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 59: 262–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dillon, M. O. (2005). The Solanaceae of the Lomas formations of coastal Peru and Chile. In: Keating, R. C., Hollowell, V. C. & Croat, T. B. (eds) A festschrift for William G. D'Arcy: the legacy of a taxonomist. Monographs in Systematic Botany from the Missouri Botanical Garden, vol. 104, pp. 131–156. St Louis: Missouri Botanical Garden Press.Google Scholar
Dunal, M. F. (1816). Solanorum generumque affinium Synopsis editiones secundae summarium: ad characteres differentiales readactum, seriem naturalem, habitationes stationesque specierum brevitur indicans. Montpellier.Google Scholar
Dunal, M. F. (1852). Solanaceae. In: de Candolle, A. (ed.) Prodromus Systematis Naturalis Regni Vegetabilis 13(1): 1–690.Google Scholar
Feuillée, L. E. (1725). Journal des observations physiques, máthematiques et botaniques, vol. 3. Paris.Google Scholar
Frodin, D. G. (2004). History and concepts of big plant genera. Taxon 53: 753–776.Google Scholar
Hickey, L. J. (1979). A revised classification of the architecture of dicotyledonous leaves. In: Metcalfe, C. R. & Chalk, L. (eds) Anatomy of the dicotyledons, volume I. Systematic anatomy of leaf and stem, with a brief history of the subject, 2nd edition, pp. 25–39. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hooker, W. J. (1827). Witheringia montana. Mountain Witheringia or St. Lorenzo potato. Bot. Mag. 54(1): 2768.Google Scholar
Hunziker, A. T. (2001). The genera of Solanaceae. Ruggell, Germany: A.R.G. Gantner Verlag, KG.Google Scholar
Jackson, B. D. (1928). A glossary of botanical terms with their derivation and accent, 4th edition. London: Duckworth.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knapp, S. (2002a). Solanum section Geminata (Solanaceae). Fl. Neotrop. Monogr. 84: 1–595.Google Scholar
Knapp, S. (2002b). Tobacco to tomatoes: a phylogenetic perspective on fruit diversity in the Solanaceae. J. Exp. Bot. 53: 2001–2022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knapp, S. (2007). Lectotypification of Cavanilles' names in Solanum (Solanaceae). Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 64: 195–203.Google Scholar
Knapp, S. & Jarvis, C. (1990). The typification of the names of New World Solanum species described by Linnaeus. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 104: 325–367.Google Scholar
Lamarck, J. B. & de Monnet, A. P. (1794). Tableau Encyclopédique et Méthodique, vol. 2. Paris.Google Scholar
Linnaeus, C. (1753). Species Plantarum. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Loddiges, C. (1832). Witheringia purpurea. Bot. Cab. 19: 1892.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (1960). Las especies de plantas descritas por R.A. Philippi en el siglo XIX; estudio crítico en la identificatión de sus tipos nomenclaturales. Universidad de Chile.Google Scholar
Nelson, G. & Platnick, N. (1981). Systematics and biogeography: cladistics and vicariance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
PBI Solanum Project (2007). Solanaceae Source: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/solanaceaesource/ (accessed July 2007).Google Scholar
Peralta, I. E., Knapp, S. & Spooner, D. M. (In press). The taxonomy of tomatoes: a revision of wild tomatoes (Solanum L. section Lycopersicon (Mill.) Wettst.) and their outgroup relatives (Solanum sections Juglandifolium (Rydb.) Child and Lycopersicoides (Child) Peralta). Syst. Bot. Monogr.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. (1855). Abstract of a Report Made by Dr. R. A. Philippi to the Government of Chile, of a Journey into the Desert of Atacama in 1853–54. J. Roy. Geogr. Soc. London 25: 158–171.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. (1860). Florula Atacamensis. Santiago.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. (1873). Descripción de las plantas nuevas incorporadas ultimamente en el herbario chileno, por el doctor don Rodolfo A. Philippi. Anales Univ. Chile 43: 479–583.Google Scholar
Philippi, R. A. (1895). Plantas nuevas de las familias que corresponden al tomo V de la obra de Gay (continuación). Anales Univ. Chile 91: 5–47.Google Scholar
Pickering, E. (2006). Testing species boundaries using morphometric and molecular data in a morphologically variable species of Solanum (Solanaceae). MSc thesis, Imperial College, London.Google Scholar
Rémy, J. (1849). Solanaceae. In: Gay, R., Historia física y política de Chile, vol. 5. Santiago.Google Scholar
Ruiz, H. (1940). Travels of Ruiz, Pavón, and Dombey in Peru and Chile (1777–1788). Field Mus. Nat. Hist., Bot. Ser. 21: 1–372.Google Scholar
Ruiz, H. & Pavón, J. A.(1799). Flora Peruvianae, et chilensis prodromus, vol. 2. Madrid.Google Scholar
Rundel, P. W., Dillon, M. O., Palma, B., Mooney, H. A., Gulman, S. L. & Ehleringer, J. R. (1991). The phytogeography and ecology of the coastal Atacama and Peruvian deserts. Aliso 13(1): 1–49.Google Scholar
Seemann, B. (1853). Narrative of the Voyage of HMS Herald. London: Reeve & Co.Google Scholar
Seithe, A. (1962). Die Haararten der Gattung Solanum L. und ihre taxonomische Verwertung. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 81: 261–336.Google Scholar
Steele, A. R. (1964). Flowers for the King: the expedition of Ruiz and Pavón and the Flora of Peru. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Symon, D. E. (1987). Placentation patterns and seed numbers in Solanum (Solanaceae) fruits. J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 10: 179–199.Google Scholar
Symon, D. E. (1994). Kangaroo apples: Solanum sect. Archaesolanum. Published by the author, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Weese, T. L. & Bohs, L. (2007). A three-gene phylogeny of the genus Solanum (Solanaceae). Syst. Bot. 32(2): 445–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar