Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:54:09.208Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plausibility in Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 December 2008

Bart Nooteboom
Bart Nooteboom
Affiliation:
Research Institute for Small and Medium-Sized Business, The Netherlands.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

According to the instrumentalism of Friedman (1970) and Machlup (1967) it is irrelevant whether the explanatory principles or “assumptions” of a theory satisfy any criterion of “plausibility,” “realism,” “credibility,” or “soundness.” In this view the main or only criterion for selecting theories is whether a theory yields empirically testable implications that turn out to be consistent with observations. All we should require or expect from a theory is that it is a useful instrument for the purpose of prediction. Considerations of the “efficiency” of a theory for the purpose of ordering our experiences are permitted (Friedman), but considerations of “plausibility” are not (Friedman and Machlup). “Explanatory assumptions” are not really explanatory in the sense that they claim to represent underlying causal processes in reality; they only serve to generate, by deduction, implications that are in accordance with as many observations as possible.

Type
Essays
Information
Economics & Philosophy , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , October 1986 , pp. 197 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barr, W. F. 1971. “A Syntactic and Semantic Analysis of Idealizations in Science.” Philosophy of Science 38:258–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachelard, G. 1970. La Formation de l'Esprit Scientifique. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. 1972. Le Matérialisme Rationel. Paris: Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar
Bachelard, G. 1973. La Philosophie du Non. Paris: Presses Universitaires.Google Scholar
Brunner, K. 1969. “‘Assumptions’ and the Cognitive Quality of Theories.” Synthese 20:501–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaug, M. 1981. The Methodology of Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, E. 1970. The Problem of Knowledge. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Copleston, F. C. 1963. A History of Philosophy, vol. 3, part III. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Cross, R. 1982. “The Duhem-Quine Thesis, Lakatos and the Appraisal of Theories in Macroeconomics.” Economic Journal 92:320–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyerabend, P. K. 1976. Against Method. London: New Left.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. 1970. “The Methodology of Positive Economics.” In Essays on Positive Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
Garb, G. 1965. “Professor Samuelson on Theory and Realism; Comment.” American Economic Review 55:1151–53.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. 1979. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Sussex: Harvester, Hassocks.Google Scholar
Händler, E. W. 1980. “The Logical Structure of Modern Neo-Classical Static Microeconomic Equilibrium Theory.” Erkenntnis 15:33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahn, F., and Hollis, M. (editors). 1979. Philosophy and Economic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hamminga, R. 1983. Neo-Classical Theory Structure and Theory Development. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson, N. R. 1979. Patterns of Discovery. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Harré, R. 1972. Principles of Scientific Thinking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Harré, R., and Madden, E. H.. 1975. Causal Powers. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hausman, D. M. 1981. “John Stuart Mill's Philosophy of Economics.” Philosophy of Science 48:363–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helm, D. 1984. “Predictions and Causes: A Comparison of Friedman and Hicks on Method.” Oxford Economic Papers, 36 (1984): 118–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, C. G., and Oppenheim, P.. 1948. “Studies in the Logic of Explanation.” Philosophy of Science 15:134–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klant, J. J. 1984. Rules of the Game. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Koopmans, T. C. 1957. “The Construction of Economic Knowledge.” In Three Essays on the State of Economic Science. New York: McGraw Hill, pp. 127–66.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. 1974. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (editor). 1976. Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Latsis, S. J. (editor). 1980. Method and Appraisal in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge Unversity Press.Google Scholar
Leibenstein, H. 1976. Beyond Economic Man. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Machlup, F. 1964. “Professor Samuelson on Theory and Realism.” American Economic Review 54:733–35.Google Scholar
Machlup, F. 1967. “Theories of the Firm: Marginalist, Behavioral, Managerial.” American Economic Review 57:1–33.Google Scholar
Massey, G. J. 1965. “Professor Samuelson on Theory and Realism; Comment.” American Economic Review 55:1155–63.Google Scholar
Marris, R., and Wood, A.. 1971. The Corporate Economy. London: MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCloskey, D. N. 1983. “The Rhetoric of Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 21:481–517.Google Scholar
Melitz, J. 1965. “Friedman and Machlup on the Significance of Testing Economic Assumptions.” Journal of Political Economics 73:37–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenbesser, S. 1969. “The Realist-Instrumentalist Controversy.” In “Philosophy, Science, and Method,” edited by Morgenbesser, , Suppe, , and White, . New York: St. Martin's, pp. 200–18.Google Scholar
Nagel, E. 1963. “Assumptions in Economic Theory.” American Economic Review, Proceedings 53:211–19.Google Scholar
Nagel, E. 1971. The Structure of Science. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, B. 1976. “Production Functions and Mark-up Pricing; with a Methodological Inquiry and an Empirical Study of Grocers,” Report 7613/ES, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Nooteboom, B. 1984. “Intransitive Preferences in Retailing.” Service Industries Journal 4:82–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, C. S. 1957. Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. 1969. Knowing and Being. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. 1973. Personal Knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1972. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Popper, K. R. 1974. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. 1975. Mind, Language, and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1951. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” The Philosophical Review 60:20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1962. From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1976. Word & Object. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. and Ullian, J. S.. 1978. The Web of Belief. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. 1980. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rescher, N. 1969. Cognitive Systematization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1964. “Theory and Realism: A Reply.” American Economic Review 54:736–39.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. A. 1965. “Professor Samuelson on Theory and Realism; Reply.” American Economic Review 55:1164–72.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de. 1979. Cours de Linguistique Générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Sen, A. 1973. “Behaviour and the Concept of Preference.” Economica 40:241–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. 1979. “Rational Fools.” In Philosophy and Economic Theory, edited by Hahn, F. and Hollis, M.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shapere, D. 1979. “Scientific Theories and Their Domains.” In The Structure of Scientific Theories, edited by Suppe, . Chicago: University of Illinois Press, pp. 518–62.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1979. “From Substantive to Procedural Rationality.” In Method and Appraisal in Economics, edited by Latsis, S. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 129–48, and in Philosophy and Economic Theory, edited by F. Hahn and M. Hollis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 65–86.Google Scholar
Sneed, J. D. 1976. “Philosophical Problems in the Empirical Science of Science: A Formal Approach.” Erkenntnis 10:115–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suppe, F. (editor). 1979. The Structure of Scientific Theories. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Toulmin, S. 1977. Human Understanding. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1965. The Blue and Brown Books. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1976. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar