Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:37:52.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Outbreak or Epidemic? How Obama’s Language Choice Transformed the Ebola Outbreak Into an Epidemic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2016

Anat Gesser-Edelsburg ,
Yaffa Shir-Raz ,
Oshrat Sassoni Bar-Lev ,
James J. James  and
Manfred S. Green
Anat Gesser-Edelsburg*
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
Yaffa Shir-Raz
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
Oshrat Sassoni Bar-Lev
Affiliation:
Department of Communication, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
James J. James
Affiliation:
Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Manfred S. Green
Affiliation:
School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to Anat Gesser-Edelsburg, PhD, Health Promotion Program, School of Public Health, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave, Mount Carmel, Haifa 3498838, Israel (e-mail: [email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Our aim was to examine in what terms leading newspapers’ online sites described the current Ebola crisis.

Methods

We employed a quantitative content analysis of terms attributed to Ebola. We found and analyzed 582 articles published between March 23 and September 30, 2014, on the online websites of 3 newspapers: The New York Times, Daily Mail, and Ynet. Our theoretical framework drew from the fields of health communication and emerging infectious disease communication, including such concepts as framing media literacy, risk signatures, and mental models.

Results

We found that outbreak and epidemic were used interchangeably in the articles. From September 16, 2014, onward, epidemic predominated, corresponding to when President Barack Obama explicitly referred to Ebola as an epidemic. Prior to Obama’s speech, 86.8% of the articles (323) used the term outbreak and only 8.6% (32) used the term epidemic. Subsequently, both terms were used almost the same amount: 53.8% of the articles (113) used the term outbreak and 53.3% (112) used the term epidemic.

Conclusions

Effective communication is crucial during public health emergencies such as Ebola, because language framing affects the decision-making process of social judgments and actions. The choice of one term (outbreak) over another (epidemic) can create different conceptualizations of the disease, thereby influencing the risk signature. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2016;10:669–673)

Keywords

Ebolaframing affectoutbreak and epidemicEID communicationcontent analysis
Type
Original Research
Information
Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness , Volume 10 , Issue 4 , August 2016 , pp. 669 - 673
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Disaster Medicine and Public Health, Inc. 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. World Health Organization. Ebola virus disease. Fact sheet N°103. WHO website. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs103/en/. Published 2014. Accessed October 7, 2014.Google Scholar
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. About Ebola Haemorrhagic Fever. CDC website. http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/about.html. Published 2014. Accessed October 7, 2014.Google Scholar
3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ebola. CDC website. http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/ebola/. Published 2014. Accessed October 7, 2014.Google Scholar
4. World Health Organization. Ebola Situation Report - 17 February 2016. WHO website. http://apps.who.int/ebola/current-situation/ebola-situation-report-17-february-2016. Published February 17, 2016. Accessed February 18, 2016.Google Scholar
5. Aronson, SS, Shope, TR. Outbreaks, epidemics, and other infectious disease emergencies. In: Aronson SS, Shope TR, eds. Managing Infectious Diseases in Child Care and Schools: A Quick Reference Guide, 2nd ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2008:169-171.Google Scholar
6. Green, MS, Swartz, T, Mayshar, E, et al. When is an epidemic an epidemic? Isr Med Assoc J . 2002;4(1):3-6.Google Scholar
7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2014 Ebola outbreak in West Africa. CDC website. http://www.cdc.gov/vhf/ebola/outbreaks/2014-west-africa/index.html. Published 2014. Accessed October 7, 2014.Google Scholar
8. World Health Organization. WHO welcomes decision to establish United Nations Mission for Ebola Emergency Response. News release. WHO website. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2014/ebola-emergency-response/en/. Published 2014. Accessed October 7, 2014.Google Scholar
9. Cooper, H, Fink, S. Obama presses leaders to speed Ebola response. The New York Times http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/17/world/africa/obama-urges-world-powers-to-bolster-ebola-response.html?_r=0. Published September 16, 2014. Accessed April 6, 2016.Google Scholar
10. Fitzgerald, S. New York Times: Obama ‘angry’ over Ebola response. Newsmax October 18, 2014.Google Scholar
11. Kahneman, D, Tversky, A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica . 1979;6:621-630.Google Scholar
12. Kahneman, D, Tversky, A. The psychology of preferences. Sci Am . 1982;246(1):160-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0182-160.Google Scholar
13. Tversky, A, Kahneman, D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211(4481):453-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683.Google Scholar
14. Davis, JJ. The effects of message framing on response to environmental communications. Journalism Mass Commun Q. 1995;72(2):285-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107769909507200203.Google Scholar
15. Pelletier, LG, Sharp, E. Persuasive communication and proenvironmental behaviours: how message tailoring and message framing can improve the integration of behaviours through self-determined motivation. Can Psychol . 2008;49(3):210-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0012755.Google Scholar
16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Principles of epidemiology in public health practice, Third Edition. An introduction to applied epidemiology and biostatistics. Lesson 6: Investigating an outbreak. CDC website. http://www.cdc.gov/ophss/csels/dsepd/ss1978/lesson6/section2.html. Published 2012. Accessed February 18, 2016.Google Scholar
17. Macera, CA, Shaffer, RA, Shaffer, PM. Introduction to Epidemiology: Distribution and Determinants of Disease Humans. Clifton Park, NY: Delmar: Cengage Learning; 2013.Google Scholar
18. Petts, J, Horlick-Jones, T, Murdock, G. Social Amplification of Risk: The Media and the Public. Contract research report 329/2001. Sudbury, VT: HSE Books; 2001.Google Scholar
19. Holmes, BJ, Henrich, N, Hancock, S, et al. Communicating with the public during health crises: experts’ experiences and opinions. J Risk Res . 2009;12(6):793-807. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13669870802648486.Google Scholar
20. Cvetkovich, G, Lofstedt, RE. Social Trust and the Management of Risk. London: Earthscan Publications; 1999.Google Scholar
21. Earle, TC, Cvetkovich, G. Social Trust: Toward a Cosmopolitan Society. Westport, CT: Praeger; 1995.Google Scholar
22. Löfstedt, RE. Risk Management in Post-Trust Societies. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230503946.Google Scholar
23. Covello, VT. Best practices in public health risk and crisis communication. J Health Commun . 2003;8(sup1):5-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713851971.Google Scholar
24. Frewer, L, Hunt, S, Brennan, M, et al. The views of scientific experts on how the public conceptualize uncertainty. J Risk Res . 2003;6(1):75-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1366987032000047815.Google Scholar
25. Sandman, P. Understanding the risk: What frightens rarely kills. Nieman Reports. 2007; Spring: 59-66.Google Scholar
26. Morgan, MG, Fischhoff, B, Bostrom, A, et al. Communicating risk to the public. Environ Sci Technol . 1992;26(11):2048-2056.Google Scholar
27. Nutbeam, D. Health Promotion Glossary. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1998.Google Scholar
28. Root, J, Stableford, S. Easy-to-read consumer communications: a missing link in Medicaid managed care. J Health Polit Policy Law. 1999;24(1):1-26.Google Scholar
29. Zettl, H. Contextual media aesthetics as the basis for media literacy. J Commun . 1998;48(1):81-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02739.x.Google Scholar
30. Brecklin, T, Hoffman, G. Using general semantics as the theoretical foundation for teaching media literacy. In: Kodish SP, Holston RP, eds. Developing Sanity in Human Affairs. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press; 1998:313-319.Google Scholar
31. Chory-Assad, RM, Tamborini, R. Television doctors: an analysis of physicians in fictional and non-fictional television programs. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 2001;45(3):499-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4503_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Weimann, G, Lev, E. Mass-mediated medicine. Isr Med Assoc J . 2006;8(11):757-762.Google Scholar
33. Entwistle, V. Reporting research in medical journals and newspapers. BMJ . 1995;310(6984):920-923. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6984.920.Google Scholar
34. Granner, ML, Sharpe, PA, Burroughs, EL, et al. Newspaper content analysis in evaluation of a community-based participatory project to increase physical activity. Health Educ Res . 2010;25(4):656-667. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/her/cyp049.Google Scholar
35. Associated Press. Top 10 newspapers by circulation: Wall Street Journal leads weekday circulation. Huffington Post. http://www.gutenberg.us/articles/list_of_newspapers_in_the_united_states_by_circulation. Published April 30, 2013.Google Scholar
36. Ponsford, D. NRS: Daily Mail most popular UK newspaper in print and online with 23m readers a month. PressGazette. http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/nrs-daily-mail-most-popular-uk-newspaper-print-and-online-23m-readers-month-0. Published February 26, 2016. Accessed April 14, 2016.Google Scholar
37. Wertheim, D. TGI Survey for the first half of 2014: The gap between Israel Today and Yedioth Ahronoth is expanding. Walla. http://b.walla.co.il/item/2769911. Published July 28, 2014.Google Scholar
38. Nossiter, A. Fear of Ebola breeds a terror of physicians. The New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/28/world/africa/ebola-epidemic-west-africa-guinea.html. Published July 27, 2014. Accessed April 6, 2016.Google Scholar
39. Parry, L. Pictured: first British healthy volunteer to be injected with experimental Ebola vaccine designed to fight deadly virus. Daily Mail. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2759001/First-UK-Ebola-vaccine-trial-Healthy-volunteer-injected-experimental-drug-designed-fight-deadly-virus.html. Published September 17, 2014. Accessed April 6, 2016.Google Scholar
40. Flynn, P. The handling of the H1N1 pandemic: more transparency needed. (Doc. 12283). Parliamentary Assembly, Council of Europe. http://assembly.coe.int/nw/Home-EN.asp. Published June 7, 2010.Google Scholar
41. Bennett, WL. Toward a theory of press-state relations in the United States. J Commun . 1990;40(2):103-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Cunningham, B. Re-thinking objectivity. Columbia J Rev. 2003; July/August:24-32.Google Scholar
43. Gans, HJ. Deciding What’s News - A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Vintage; 1980.Google Scholar
44. Brezis, M. Who will Look After the Health of the Media? Ramat Gan: Israel Medical Council; 2002.Google Scholar
45. Castillo, M. CDC Director Tom Frieden faces rising tide of criticism. CNN. http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/14/health/cdc-frieden-facing-criticism/. Published October 14, 2014. Accessed April 6, 2016.Google Scholar