Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:15:58.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mutual Recognition and Rational Justification in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2010

Kenneth R. Westphal
Kenneth R. Westphal*
Affiliation:
University of Kent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Individual rational judgment, of the kind required for justification in cognition or morals, is fundamentally socially and historically conditioned. I argue for this by defending key themes from Kant’s and Hegel’s accounts of rational judgment and justification, including the “autonomy” of rational judgment and one key point of Hegel’s account of “mutual recognition.” These themes are rooted in Kant’s and Hegel’s transformation of the modern natural law tradition, which originates the properly pragmatic account of rationality, which affords genuine rational justification, and which provides for realism about the objects of empirical knowledge and strict objectivity about moral norms.

RÉSUMÉ : Le jugement rationnel individuel, tel qu’il est requis dans toute entreprise de justification en matière de connaissance ou de morale, est, de manière fondamentale, conditionné socialement et historiquement. Notre argumentation en ce sens prend la défense de quelques thèmes clés de la conception kantienne et hégélienne du jugement rationnel et de la justification, parmi lesquels l’«autonomie» du jugement rationnel et un point essentiel de la conception hégélienne de la «reconnaissance mutuelle». Ces thèmes sont enracinés dans les transformations kantienne et hégélienne de la tradition du droit naturel moderne, qui sont à l’origine de la conception proprement pragmatique de la rationalité, laquelle fournit une justification authentiquement rationnelle et garantit une appréhension réaliste des objets de la connaissance empirique et une stricte objectivité à propos des normes morales.

Type
Articles
Information
Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review / Revue canadienne de philosophie , Volume 48 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 753 - 799
Copyright
Copyright © Canadian Philosophical Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcoff, Linda 1996 Real Knowing: New Versions of the Coherence Theory. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, Henry 1990 Kant’s Theory of Freedom. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry 1997 “We can act only under the Idea of Freedom.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 71 (2): 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William P. 1988 “An Internalist Externalism.” Synthese 74 (3): 265–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William P. 1989 Essays in Epistemic Justification. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ameriks, Karl 1978 “Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument.” Kant-Studien 69 (3): 273–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aristotle, 1999 Nichomachean Ethics. 2nd. ed. Translated by Irwin, Terrence. Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing; designated “EN.”Google Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. 2002 German Idealism: The Struggle Against Subjectivism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. 2005 Hegel. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. 2009 Morality in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Pp. 209–25 in The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Edited by Westphal, K.R.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bender, John W., ed. 1989 The State of the Coherence Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Brinkman, Klaus 2003 Hegel on Forgiveness. Pp. 243–64 in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Edited by Denker, A. and Vater, M.. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books/Prometheus.Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler 1979 “Individualism and the Mental.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4: 73–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burge, Tyler 1992 “Philosophy of Language and Mind: 1950–1990.” The Philosophical Review 101 (1): 3–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bykova, Marina 2009 Spirit and Concrete Subjectivity in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Pp. 265–95 in The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Edited by Westphal, K.R.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiereghin, Franco 2009 Freedom and Thought: Stoicism, Skepticism, and Unhappy Consciousness. Pp. 55–71 in The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Edited by Westphal, K.R.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooper, John M. 1980 Aristotle on Friendship. Pp. 301–340 in Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics. Edited by Rorty, A.. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Laurentiis, Allegra 2009 Absolute Knowing. Pp. 246–264 in The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Edited by Westphal, K.R.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, René 1964–76 Oevres de Descartes. Rev. ed. Edited by Adam, C. and Tannery, P.. Paris: Vrin/C.N.R.S.; designated “AT.”Google Scholar
Descartes, René 1985, 1991 The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. 3 vols. Translated and edited by Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R. and Murdoch, D.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; designated “CSM.”Google Scholar
deVries, Williem 1988 Hegel’s Theory of Mental Activity. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
di Giovanni, George 2009 Religion, History, and Spirit in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Pp. 226–245 in The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Edited by Westphal, K.R.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Einstein, Albert 2000 The Expanded Quotable Einstein. Edited by Calaprice, A.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Elgin, Katherine Z. 1999 Considered Judgment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ferrini, Cinzia 2009 Reason Observing Nature. Pp. 92–135 in The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Edited by Westphal, K.R.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb 1798 Das System der Sittenlehre nach den Prinzipien der Wissenschaftslehre. Jena and Leipzig: Gabler.Google Scholar
Fichte, Johann Gottlieb 2005 The System of Ethics, According to the Principles of the Wissenschaftslehre. Translated by Breazeale, D. and Zöller, G.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodman, Nelson 1965 Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Griffin, James 1996 Value Judgment: Improving our Ethical Beliefs. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 1993 Evidence and Inquiry. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 1998 Manifesto of a Passionate Moderate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 2002 A Foundherentist Theory of Empirical Justification. Pp. 417–31 in Epistemology: Contemporary Readings. Edited by Huemer, M.New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Haack, Susan 2003 Defending Science – within Reason. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.Google Scholar
Harris, Henry S. 1997 Hegel’s Ladder. 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1968 Gesammelte Werke. Edited by Buchner, H. and Pöggeler, O.. Hamburg: Meiner; designated “GW.”Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1980 Phänomenologie des Geistes. GW 9; designated “PhdG”; cited by volume:page.line numbers.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1986 The Philosophical Propaedeutic. Translated by Miller, A. V. and edited by George, M. and Vincent, A.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1991 Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Translated by Nisbet, H. B. and edited by Wood, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2000 Vorlesung über Naturphilosophie Berlin 1823/24. Nachschrift von K.G.J.v. Griesheim. Edited by Marmasse, G.. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2006 Nürnberger Gymnasialkurse und Gymnasialreden (1808–1816). GW 10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 2008 The Phenomenology of Spirit. Draft translation by Terry Pinkard. Cited by paragraph (¶) numbers provided by the translator corresponding to GW 9. Posted by the translator at: http://web.mac.com/titpaul/Site/About_Me_files/Phenomenology%20of%20Spirit%20(entire%20text).pdfGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl 1935 “On the Logical Positivists’ Theory of Truth.” Analysis 2 (4): 49–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hempel, Carl 1936 “Some Remarks on Empiricism.” Analysis 3 (3): 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, Barbara 1993 The Practice of Moral Judgment. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Houlgate, Stephen 2003 Desiderio, riconoscimento e morte nella Fenomenologia di Hegel. Pp. 597–616 in Hegel Contemporaneo. La ricenzione americana di Hegel a confronto con lat tradizionne europea. Edited by Ruggiu, L. and Testa, I.. Instituto Italiano per gli Studie Filosofici: Napoli; Edizzioni Angela Guerini e Associate SpA: Milano.Google Scholar
Houlgate, Stephen 2005 An Introduction to Hegel. Freedom, Truth and History. 2nd. rev. ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hume, David 1975 Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. 3rd. ed. Edited by Nidditch, P.H.. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hume, David 2000 A Treatise of Human Nature. Edited by Norton, D.F. and Norton, M.J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press; designated “T.”Google Scholar
Juhos, Béla von 1934 “Empiricism and Physicalism.” Analysis 2 (6): 81–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1902 Gesammelte Schriften. Edited by the Königlich Preußische [now Deutsche] Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlin: G. Reimer [now De Gruyter]; designated “AA.”Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel 1999 Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Translated and edited by Gregor, M.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kettner, Matthias 1992 “Kant als Gesinnungsethiker.” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 5: 524–40.Google Scholar
Locke, John 1975 An Essay concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Nidditch, P.H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Longino, Helen E. 1994 The Fate of Knowledge in Social Theories of Science. Pp. 135–57 in Socializing Epistemology. Edited by Schmitt, F.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Lucas, Hans-Christian 2004 Das Problem der Einleitung in Hegels Enzyklopädisches System. ‘Vorreden’, ‘Einleitung’ und ‘Vorbegriff’ der Logik zwischen 1817 und 1830. Pp. 41–70 in Hegels Enzyklopädisches System der Philosophie. Von der “Wissenschaft der Logik” zur Philosophie des absoluten Geistes. Edited by Lucas, H.-C., Tuschling, B., and Vogel, U.. Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt: Fromann-Holzboog.Google Scholar
McDowell, John 1994 Mind and World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Meyers, Robert 1988 The Likelihood of Knowledge. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhouser, Frederick 2009 Desire, Recognition, and the Relation between Bondsman and Lord. Pp. 37–54 in The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Edited by Westphal, K.R.. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neurath, Otto 1931 “Soziologie im Physikalismus.” Erkenntnis 2 (1): 393–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neurath, Otto 1934 “Radikaler Physikalismus und ‘Wirkliche Welt’.” Erkenntnis 4: 346–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neurath, Otto 1959 Sociology and Physicalism. Translated by Magnus, M. and Raico, R.. Pp. 282–317 in Logical Positivism. Edited by Ayer, A.J.. New York: Free Press. (Translation of Neurath 1931.)Google Scholar
Nuzzo, Angelica 2005 The Role of the Human Body in Fichte’s Grundlage des Naturrechts (1796–97). Pp. 45–58 in Rights, Bodies, and Recognition: New Essays on Fichte’s Foundations of Natural Right. Edited by Breazeale, D. and Rockmore, T.. Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 1989 Constructions of Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 1992 Vindicating Reason. Pp. 280–308 in The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Edited by Guyer, P.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 1996 Towards Justice and Virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2000 Kant and the Social Contract Tradition. Pp. 185–200 in Kant Actuel: Hommage à Pierre Laberge. Edited by Duchesneau, F., Lafrance, G., and Piché, C.. Montréal: Bellarmin.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2002 Autonomy and the Fact of Reason in the Kritik der praktischen Vernunft §§7–8 pp. 30–41, 81–97 in Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Edited by Höffe, O.. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2003 Constructivism in Rawls and Kant. Pp. 347–67 in The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Edited by Freeman, S.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2004a Autonomy, Plurality and Public Reason. Pp. 181–94 in New Essays in the History of Autonomy. Edited by Brender, N. and Krasnoff, L.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Onora 2004b Self-Legislation, Autonomy and the Form of Law. Pp. 13–26 in Recht, Geschichte, Religion: Die Bedeutung Kants für die Gegenwart. Edited by Nagl-Docekal, H. and Langthaler, R.. Berlin: Akademie.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlmutter, Martin 1998 Moral Intuitions and Philosophical Method. Pp. 203–18 in Pragmatism, Reason, and Norms: A Realistic Assessment. Edited by Westphal, K.R.. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Quante, Michael 2009 ‘Der reine Begriff des Anerkennens’. Überlegungen zur Grammatik der Anerkennungsrelation in Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes. Pp. 91–106 in Anerkennung. Edited by Schmidt am Busch, H.-C. and Zurn, C. F.. Berlin: Akademie.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quante, Michael 2010 ‘The Pure Notion of Recognition’: Reflections on the Grammar of the Recognition Relation in Hegel. (English tr. of previous item.) Pp. 89–106 in The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Edited by Schmidt am Busch, H.-C. and Zurn, C. F.. Lanham, MA: Lexington Books/Rowman and Littlefield).Google Scholar
Rawls, John 1971 A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, Paul 2005 Fichte’s Role in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit, Chapter 4. Paper presented at American Philosophical Association, March 25, 2005, Pacific Division, Annual Conference, San Francisco; http://www-personal.arts.usyd.edu.au/paureddi/Redding_Hegel-Fichte.pdfGoogle Scholar
Redding, Paul 2008 The Independence and Dependence of Self-Consciousness: The Dialectic of Lord and Bondsman in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Pp. 94–110 in The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth Century Philosophy. Edited by Beiser, F. C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redding, Paul 2010 The Role of Work within the Processes of Recognition in Hegel’s Idealism. In: New Philosophies of Labour: Work and the Social Bond, edited by Smith, Nicholas H. and Deranty, Jean-Philippe. Leiden and Boston, Brill. Pre-print: http://www-personal.arts.usyd.edu.au/paureddi/Redding_Hegel-rec&work.pdfGoogle Scholar
Reidy, David 1999 “Rawls’s Idea(l) of Public Reason.” Polis 6: 93–113.Google Scholar
Reidy, David 2000 “Rawls’s Wide View of Public Reason: Not Wide Enough.” Res Publica 6: 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savigny, Eike von 1991 “Self-conscious Individual versus Social Self: The Rationale of Wittgenstein’s Discussion of Rule Following.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51: 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt am Busch, Hans-Christoph, and Zurn, Christopher F., eds. 2010 The Philosophy of Recognition: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books/Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Schneewind, Jerry 1989 The Invention of Autonomy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid 1963 Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sextus Empiricus, 1934 Outlines of Pyrrhonism. Translated by Rev. Bury, R.G.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; designatd “PH.”Google Scholar
Siep, Ludwig 2006 Die Bewegung des Anerkennens in Hegels Phänomenologie des Geistes. Pp. 109–29 in G. W. F. Hegel: Phänomenologie des Geistes, rev. ed. Edited by Pöggeler, O. and Köhler, D.. Berlin: Akademie.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter 2006 Moral Skepticisms. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teller, Paul 2001 “Whither Constructive Empiricism?” Philosophical Studies 106: 123–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Fraassen, Bastian 2002 The Empirical Stance. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Vasilyev, Vadim 2005 100 Et’udov o Kante. (International Kantian Inverview.) Pp. 3–116 in: Istoriko-Filosofsky Almanach, Vipusk 1 (Moskva: Sovremennie Tetradi); http://www.philos.msu.ru/community/staff/vasiliev/Kant_Interview/Kant_Interview.htmGoogle Scholar
Wallgren, Thomas 2006 Tranformative Philosophy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books/Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1987–88 “Sextus Empiricus Contra René Descartes.” Philosophy Research Archives 13: 91–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1989 Hegel’s Epistemological Realism. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1993 The Basic Context and Structure of Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Pp. 234–69 in The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Edited by Beiser, F. C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1996 “Kant, Hegel, and the Transcendental Material Conditions of Possible Experience.” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 33: 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1997 “Do Kant’s Principles Justify Property or Usufruct?” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/ Annual Review of Law and Ethics 5: 141–94.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 1998 Hegel’s Solution to the Dilemma of the Criterion. Rev. ed. Pp. 76–91 in The Phenomenology of Spirit Reader: A Collection of Critical and Interpretive Essays. Edited by Stewart, J.. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2000a “Hegel’s Internal Critique of Naïve Realism.” Journal of Philosophical Research 25: 173–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2000b “Hegel, Harris, and Sextus Empiricus.” Owl of Minerva 31 (2): 155–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2002a “Rationality and Relativism: The Historical and Contemporary Significance of Hegel’s Response to Sextus Empiricus.” Esercizi Filosofici (Dipartimento di Filosofia, Universitá degli Studi di Trieste) 6: 22–33.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2002b “Razionalità e relativismo: Il significato storico e contemporaneo della risposta hegeliana a Sesto Empirico.” Translated by Ferrini, C.. Etica e Politica 4.1 (2002); http://www.units.it/~etica/2002_1/index.html (Italian tr. of Westphal 2002a.)Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2002c A Kantian Justification of Possession. Pp. 89–109 in Kant’s Metaphysics of Ethics: Interpretive Essays. Edited by Timmons, M.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2003a Hegel’s Epistemology: A Philosophical Introduction to the Phenomenology of Spirit. Cambridge, MA: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2003b “Objektive Gültigkeit zwischen Gegebenem und Gemachtem. Hegels kantischer Konstruktivismus in der praktischen Philosophie.” Jahrbuch für Recht und Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 11: 177–98.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2004 Kant’s Transcendental Proof of Realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2005a “Kant, Wittgenstein, and Transcendental Chaos.” Philosophical Investigations 28 (4): 303–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2005b “Kant, Hegel, and Determining Our Duties.” In Philosophia practica universalis. Festschrift für Joachim Hruschka. Edited by Sharon Byrd, B. and Joerden, J.. Jahrbuch für Recht and Ethik/Annual Review of Law and Ethics 13: 335–54.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2005c Von der Konvention zur Sittlichkeit. Humes Begründung einer Rechtsethik aus nach-Kantischer Perspektive. Pp. 153–80 in Ethikbegründungen Zwischen Universalismus und Relativismus. Edited by Heidemann, D. and Engelhardt, K.. Berlin: DeGruyter.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2006a Science and the Philosophers. Pp. 125–52 in Science: A Challenge to Philosophy? Edited by Koskinen, H., Pihlström, S., and Vilkko, R.. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2006b “Contemporary Epistemology: Kant, Hegel, McDowell.” The European Journal of Philosophy 14 (2): 274–302. 2008. Reprint, pp. 124–51 in McDowell: Experience, Norm and Nature. Edited by J. Lindgaard. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2007a Consciousness and its Transcendental Conditions: Kant’s Anti-Cartesian Revolt. Pp. 223–43 in Consciousness: From Perception to Reflection in the History of Philosophy. Edited by Heinämaa, S., Lähteenmäki, V. and Remes, P.. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2007b “Normative Constructivism: Hegel’s Radical Social Philosophy.” SATS – Internordic Journal of Philosophy 8 (2): 7–41.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2008a “Force, Understanding and Ontology.” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain 57/58: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2008b Philosophizing about Nature: Hegel’s Philosophical Project. Pp. 281–310 in The Cambridge Companion to Hegel and Nineteenth Century Philosophy. Edited by Beiser, F.C.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2009a Ed. The Blackwell Guide to Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. London: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2009b Hegel’s Phenomenological Method and Analysis of Consciousness. In: ibid., 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2009c Self-Consciousness, Anti-Cartesianism and Cognitive Semantics in Hegel’s 1807 Phenomenology. In The Blackwell Companion to Hegel. Edited by Houlgate, S. and Baur, M.. Oxford: Blackwell), (in press).Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2009d Constructivism, Contractarianism and Basic Obligations: Kant and Gauthier. In Reading Kant’s Doctrine of Right. Edited by Merle, J.-C.. Cardiff: University of Wales Press), (in press).Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2009e Bзaимнoe пpизнaниe и paциoнaльнoe oбocнoвaниe в «Фeнoмeнoлoгии духa» Гeгeля;. Pp. 195–219 in К 200-лeтию выхoдa в cвeт «Фeнoмeнoлoгии духa» Гeгeля. Edited by Motroshilova, N., Mocквa: Кaнoн +.Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2009f Kant’s Constructivism and Rational Justification. In Politics and Metaphysics in Kant. Edited by Baiasu, S., Pihlström, S. and Williams, H.. Cardiff: Wales University Press, (in press).Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2010a Urteilskraft, gegenseitige Anerkennung und rationale Rechtfertigung. In Klein, H.-D., ed., Ethik als prima philosophia (Würzburg: Königshausen and Neumann), (in press).Google Scholar
Westphal, Kenneth R. 2010b “From ‘Convention’ to ‘Ethical Life’: Hume’s Theory of Justice in Post-Kantian Perspective.” The Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildt, Andreas 1982 Autonomie und Anerkennung: Hegels Moralitaetskritik im Lichte seiner Fichte-Rezeption. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Will, Frederick L. 1997 Pragmatism and Realism. Edited by Westphal, K.R.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Williams, Robert 1992 Recognition: Fichte and Hegel on the Other. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Robert 1998 Hegel’s Ethics of Recognition. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Robert 2003a Forme mancati di interosoggettività nella concezionen hegeliana della conscienza nella Fenomenologia dello Spirito. Pp. 563–86 in Hegel Contemporaneo. La ricenzione americana di Hegel a confronto con lat tradizionne europea. Edited by Ruggiu, L. and Testa, I.. Instituto Italiano per gli Studie Filosofici: Napoli; Edizzioni Angela Guerini e Associate SpA: Milano.Google Scholar
Williams, Robert 2003b The Concept of Recognition in Hegel’s Phenomenology of Spirit. Pp. 59–92 in Hegel’s Phenomenlogy of Spirit. Edited by Denker, A. and Vater, M.. Amherst, NY: Humanity Books.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin 1986 Does Philosophical Investigations I.258–60 Suggest a Cogent Argument against Private Language? Pp. 209–66 in Subject, Thought, and Context. Edited by Pettit, P. and McDowell, J.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Wylie, Alison 2003 Why Standpoint Matters. Pp. 26–48 in Science and Other Cultures: Issues in Philosophies of Science and Technology. Edited by Figueroa, R. and Harding, S.. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Zöller, Gunter 1998 Fichte’s Transcendental Philosophy: The Original Duplicity of Intelligence and Will. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar