Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T00:58:25.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors associated with abusive relationships among maltreated and nonmaltreatedyouth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1998

DAVID A. WOLFE
Affiliation:
The University of Western Ontario
CHRISTINE WEKERLE
Affiliation:
The University of Western Ontario
DEBORAH REITZEL–JAFFE
Affiliation:
The University of Western Ontario
LORRIE LEFEBVRE
Affiliation:
The University of Western Ontario

Abstract

This study sought to understand how experiences of maltreatment occurring prior to 12 years of age affect adolescent peer and dating relationships. A school-based sample of 15-year-olds was divided into maltreated (n = 132) and nonmaltreated (n = 227) subgroups based on self-reported maltreatment. These two groups were then compared on two theoretically determined dimensions of adjustment (i.e., interpersonal sensitivity/hostility; personal resources) and self- and teacher-report measures of peer and dating relationships. Findings supported the hypothesis that maltreated youths significantly differed from nonmaltreated youths in terms of adjustment problems as well as conflict with dating partners and close friends. Maltreated youths reported significantly more verbal and physical abuse both toward and by their dating partners, and were seen by teachers as engaging in more acts of aggression and harassment toward others. In regression analyses, the significant association between maltreatment and dating conflict for males was strengthened by including adjustment dimensions in the equation; for females, adjustment variables mediated the association between maltreatment and dating conflict. Results are discussed in relation to a maladaptive interpersonal trajectory for maltreated children, wherein a violent interactional dynamic in adolescent close relationships may be setting the stage for violence in intimate partnerships.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)