Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:19:51.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exploring interactive effects of genes and environments in etiology of individual differences in reading comprehension

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2007

Elena L. Grigorenko ,
Colin G. Deyoung ,
Marya Getchell ,
Gerald J. Haeffel ,
Britt A.F. Klinteberg ,
Roman A. Koposov ,
Lars Oreland ,
Andrew J. Pakstis ,
Vladislav V. Ruchkin  and
Carolyn M. Yrigollen
Elena L. Grigorenko*
Affiliation:
Yale University Moscow State University, Russia
Colin G. Deyoung
Affiliation:
Yale University
Marya Getchell
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Gerald J. Haeffel
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame
Britt A.F. Klinteberg
Affiliation:
Stockholm University Karolinska Institute
Roman A. Koposov
Affiliation:
University of Tromsø Northern State Medical University, Russia
Lars Oreland
Affiliation:
Uppsala University
Andrew J. Pakstis
Affiliation:
Yale University
Vladislav V. Ruchkin
Affiliation:
Yale University Karolinska Institute Skonviks Psychiatric Clinic, Sweden
Carolyn M. Yrigollen
Affiliation:
Yale University
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Elena L. Grigorenko, Child Study Center, Yale University, 230 South Frontage Road, New Haven, CT 06519; E-mail: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is established that reading and reading-related processes are heritable; genes thus play an important role in the foundation of individual differences in reading. In this article, we focus on one facet of reading–comprehension. Comprehension is a higher order cognitive skill that requires many other cognitive processes for it to unfold completely and successfully. One such process is executive functioning, which has been associated with genetic variation in the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene. Genotypes and haplotypes of four single nucleotide polymorphisms in COMT were investigated in 179 incarcerated adolescent delinquents. Four hierarchical logistic regression models predicting the presence/absence of comprehension difficulties were fitted to the data; genetic variation in COMT and the presence/absence of maternal rejection were investigated as main effects and as effects acting interactively. Three out of four interaction terms were found to be important predictors of individual differences in comprehension. These findings were supported by the results of the haplotype analyses, in which the four investigated polymorphisms were considered simultaneously.

Type
Research Article
Information
Development and Psychopathology , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , Fall 2007 , pp. 1089 - 1103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barnett, J. H., Heron, J., Ring, S. M., Golding, J., Goldman, D., Xu, K., et al. (2007). Gender-specific effects of the catechol-O-methyltransferase Val(108)/(158)Met polymorphism on cognitive function in children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, 142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilder, R. M., Volavka, J., Czobor, P., Malhotra, A. K., Kennedy, J. L., Ni, X., et al. (2002). Neurocognitive correlates of the COMT Val(158)Met polymorphism in chronic schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 52, 701–707.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bilder, R. M., Volavka, J., Lachman, H. M., & Grace, A. A. (2004). The catechol-O-methyltransferase polymorphism: Relations to the tonic-phasic dopamine hypothesis and neuropsychiatric phenotypes. Neuropsychopharmacology, 29, 1943–1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, T., & Fox, C. (2001). Applying the Rasch model. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boudikova, B., Szumlanski, C., Maidak, B., & Weinshilboum, R. (1990). Human liver catechol-O-methyltransferase pharmacogenetics. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 48, 381–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boyle, M. H., Jenkins, J. M., Georgiades, K., Cairney, J., Duku, E., & Racine, Y. (2004). Differential-maternal parenting behavior: Estimating within- and between-family effects on children. Child Development, 75, 1457–1476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bray, N. J., Buckland, P. R., Williams, N. M., Williams, H. J., Norton, N., Owen, M. J., et al. (2003). A haplotype implicated in schizophrenia susceptibility is associated with reduced COMT expression in human brain. American Journal of Human Genetics, 73, 152–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braze, D., Tabor, W., Shankweiler, D. P., & Mencl, W. E. (2007). Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 226–243.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Briscoe-Smith, A. M., & Hinshaw, S. P. (2006). Linkages between child abuse and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in girls: Behavioral and social correlates. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30, 1239–1255.Google Scholar
Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2007). Reading comprehension difficulties: Correlates, causes, and consequences. In Cain, K. & Oakhill, J.Children's comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective 41–75). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cameron, N. M., Champagne, F. A., Fish, C. P. E. W., Ozaki-Kuroda, K., & Meaney, M. J. (2005). The programming of individual differences in defensive responses and reproductive strategies in the rat through variations in maternal care. Neuroscience Biobehavioral Review, 29, 843–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, J., Lipska, B. K., Halim, N., Ma, Q. D., Matsumoto, M., Melhem, S., et al. (2004). Functional analysis of genetic variation in catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT): Effects on mRNA, protein, and enzyme activity in postmortem human brain. American Journal of Human Genetics, 75, 807–821.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craddock, N., Owen, M. J., & O'Donovan, M. C. (2006). The catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) gene as a candidate for psychiatric phenotypes: Evidence and lessons. Molecular Psychiatry, 11, 446–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cromley, J. G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential mediation model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 311–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dai, D. Y., & Wang, X. (2007). The role of need for cognition and reader beliefs in text comprehension and interest development. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 332–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeYoung, C. G., Getchell, M., Koposov, R. A., Yrigollen, C. M., Haeffel, G. J., af Klinteberg, B., et al. (2007). Genetics of externalizing behavior: Variation in the catechol-O-methyltransferase gene associated with criminality and ADHD. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
Diamond, A., Briand, L., Fossella, J., & Gehlbach, L. (2004). Genetic and neurochemical modulation of prefrontal cognitive functions in children. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 125–132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egan, M. F., Goldberg, T. E., Kolachana, B. S., Callicott, J. H., Mazzanti, C. M., Straub, R. E., et al. (2001). Effect of COMT Val108/Met158 genotype on frontal lobe function and risk for schizophrenia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 98, 6917–6922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahndrich, E., Coper, H., Christ, W., Helmchen, H., Muller-Oerlinghausen, B., & Pietzcker, A. (1980). Erythrocyte COMT activity in patients with affective disorders. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 61, 427–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fayol, M. (1991). Text typologies: A cognitive approach. In Denhiere, G. & Rossi, J.-P.Text and text processing (pp. 61–76). Oxford: North-Holland.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, S. E., & Francks, C. (2006). Genes, cognition and dyslexia: learning to read the genome. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 250–257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fitzgerald, G. A., Hamilton, C. A., Jones, D. H., & Reid, J. L. (1980). Erythrocytes catechol-O-methyltransferase activity and indices of sympathetic activity in man. Clinical Sciences, 58, 423–425.Google ScholarPubMed
Floderus, Y., & Wetterberg, L. (1981). The inheritance of human erythrocyte catechol-O-methyltransferase activity. Clinical Genetics, 19, 392–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gajria, M., Jitendra, A. K., Sood, S., & Sacks, G. (2007). Improving comprehension of expository text in students with LD: A research synthesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 210–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaskins, I. W., Satlow, E., & Pressley, M. (2007). Executive control of reading comprehension in the elementary school. In Meltzer, L.Executive function in education: From theory to practice. 194–215). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Gogos, J. A., Morgan, M., Luine, V., Santha, M., Ogawa, S., Pfaff, D. W., et al. (1998). Catechol-O-methyltransferase-deficient mice exhibit sexually dimorphic changes in catecholamine levels and behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 95, 9991–9996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grigorenko, E. L. (2004). Genetic bases of developmental dyslexia: A capsule review of heritability estimates. Enfance, 3, 273–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorenko, E. L. (2006). Learning disabilities in juvenile offenders. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 15, 353–371.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grigorenko, E. L. (in press). Four “mons” of the brain–genes connection. In Grigorenko, E. L. & Naples, A.Single-word reading: Cognitive, behavioral and biological perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 282–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haeffel, G. J., Getchell, M., Koposov, R., Yrigollen, C. M., DeYoung, C. G., af Klinteberg, B., et al. (in press). Association among polymorphisms in the dopamine transporter gene and depression: Evidence for a gene–environment interaction in a sample of juvenile detainees. Psychological Science.Google Scholar
Hawley, M. E., & Kidd, K. K. (1995). HAPLO: A program using the EM algorithm to estimate the frequencies of multi-site haplotypes. Journal of Heredity, 86, 409–411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karayiorgou, M., Altemus, M., Galke, B. L., Goldman, D., Murphy, D. L., Ott, J., et al. (1997). Genotype determining low catechol-O-methyltransferase activity as a risk factor for obsessive–compulsive disorder. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94, 4572–4575.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karayiorgou, M., Sobin, C., Blundell, M. L., Galke, B. L., Malinova, L., Goldberg, P., et al. (1999). Family-based association studies support a sexually dimorphic effect of COMT and MAOA on genetic susceptibility to obsessive–compulsive disorder. Biolological Psychiatry, 45, 1178–1189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keller, H., Yovsi, R., Borke, J., Kartner, J., Jensen, H., & Papaligoura, Z. (2004). Developmental consequences of early parenting experiences: Self-recognition and self-regulation in three cultural communities. Child Development, 75, 1745–1760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kintsch, W., & Rawson, K. A. (2005). Comprehension. In Snowling, M. J. & Hulme, C.The science of reading: A handbook (209–226). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lansford, J. E., Criss, M. M., Pettit, G. S., Dodge, K. A., & Bates, J. E. (2003). Friendship quality, peer group affiliation, and peer antisocial behavior as moderators of the link between negative parenting and adolescent externalizing behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 161–184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maestripieri, D., Higley, J. D., Lindell, S. G., Newman, T. K., McCormack, K. M., & Sanchez, M. M. (2006). Early maternal rejection affects the development of monoaminergic systems and adult abusive parenting in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Behavioral Neuroscience, 120, 1017–1024.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meaney, M. J. (2001). Maternal care, gene expression, and the transmission of individual differences in stress reactivity across generations. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24, 1161–9112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meltzer, L. (Ed.). (2007). Executive function in education: From theory to practice. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Nichols, T., Callicott, J. H., Ding, J., Kolachana, B., Buckholtz, J., et al. (2006). Impact of complex genetic variation in COMT on human brain function. Molecular Psychiatry, 11, 867–877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagy, W. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and the vocabulary-comprehension connection. In Wagner, R. K., Muse, A. E., & Tannenbaum, K. R.Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 52–77). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Narusyte, J., Andershed, A.-K., Neiderhiser, J. M., & Lichtenstein, P. (2007). Aggression as a mediator of genetic contributions to the association between negative parent–child relationships and adolescent antisocial behavior. European Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 16, 128–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Cancer Institute–National Human Genome Research Institute (NCI-NHGRI) Working Group on Replication in Association Studies. (2007). Replicating genotype–phenotype associations. Nature, 447, 655–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Center for Education Statistics. (2005). The nation's report card. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.Google Scholar
Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (2007). Introduction to comprehension development. In Cain, K. & Oakhill, J.Children's comprehension problems in oral and written language: A cognitive perspective (pp. 3–40). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
O'Connor, T. G., Deater-Deckard, K., Fulker, D., Rutter, M., & Plomin, R. (1998). Genotype–environment correlations in late childhood and early adolescence: Antisocial behavioral problems and coercive parenting. Developmental Psychology, 34, 970–981.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ogle, L. T., Sen, A., Pahlke, E., Jocelyn, L., Kastberg, D., Roey, S., et al. (2003). International comparisons in fourth-grade reading literacy: Findings from the progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) of 2001. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.Google Scholar
O'Hara, R., Miller, E., Liao, C. P., Way, N., Lin, X. Y., & Hallmayer, J. (2006). COMT genotype, gender and cognition in community-dwelling, older adults. Neuroscience Letters, 409, 205–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olson, R. K. (2004). Genetic and environmental causes of reading disabilities: Results from the Colorado Learning Disabilities Research Center. In Turner, M. & Rack, J., The study of dyslexia (pp. 23–33). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In Snowling, M. J. & Hulme, C.The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perris, C., Jacobsson, L., Lindstrom, H., von Knorring, L., & Perris, H. (1980). Development of a new inventory assessing memories of parental rearing behaviour. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 61, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Philippu, G., Hoo, J. J., Milech, U., Argarwal, D. P., Schrappe, O., & Goedde, H. W. (1981). Catechol-O-methyltransferase of erythrocytes in patients with endogenous psychoses. Psychiatry Research, 4, 139–146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pineda, A. Q., Cole, D. A., & Bruce, A. E. (2007). Mother–adolescent interactions and adolescent depressive symptoms: A sequential analysis. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 24, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pooley, E. C., Fineberg, N., & Harrison, P. J. (in press). The met158 allele of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) is associated with obsessive–compulsive disorder in men: Case-control study and meta-analysis. Molecular Psychiatry.Google Scholar
Rasch, G. (1960/1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ruchkin, V. V., Koposov, R. A., af Klinteberg, B., Oreland, L., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2005). Platelet MAO, personality, and psychopathology in juvenile delinquents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 477–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruchkin, V. V., Schwab-Stone, M., Vermeiren, R., Koposov, R. A., & King, R. A. (2003). Suicidal ideations and attempts in juvenile delinquents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 1058–1066.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruchkin, V. V., Schwab-Stone, M., Vermeiren, R., Koposov, R. A., & Steiner, H. (2002). Violence exposure, posttraumatic stress, and personality in juvenile delinquents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 41, 322–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryan, R. M., Martin, A., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2006). Is one good parent good enough? Patterns of mother and father parenting and child cognitive outcomes at 24 and 36 months. Parenting: Science and Practice, 6, 211–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rybakowski, J. K., Borkowska, A., Czerski, P. M., Dmitrzak-Weglarz, M., Skibinska, M., Kapelski, P., et al. (2006). Performance on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in schizophrenia and genes of dopaminergic inactivation (COMT, DAT, NET). Psychiatry Research, 143, 13–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schatschneider, C., Harrell, E. R., & Buck, J. (2007). An individual-differences approach to the study of reading comprehension. In Wagner, R. K., Muse, A. E., & Tannenbaum, K. R.Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension (pp. 249–275). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Shifman, S., Bronstein, M., Sternfeld, M., Pisante-Shalom, A., Lev-Lehman, E., Weizman, A., et al. (2002). A highly significant association between a COMT haplotype and schizophrenia. American Journal of Human Genetics, 71, 1296–1302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shifman, S., Bronstein, M., Sternfeld, M., Pisante-Shalom, A., Weizman, A., Reznik, I., et al. (2004). COMT: A common susceptibility gene in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. American Journal of Medical Genetics, 128B, 61–64.Google Scholar
Smith, E. V., & Smith, R. M. (Eds.). (2005). Introduction to Rasch measurement. Chicago: JAM Press.Google Scholar
Tunbridge, E. M., Bannerman, D. M., Sharp, T., & Harrison, P. J. (2004). Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibition improves setshifting performance and elevates stimulated dopamine release in the rat prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 5331–5335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tunbridge, E. M., Harrison, P. J., & Weinberger, D. R. (2006). Catechol-o-methyltransferase, cognition, and psychosis: Val158Met and beyond. Bioliological Psychiatry, 60, 141–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vellutino, F. R., Tunmer, W. E., Jaccard, J. J., & Chen, R. (2007). Components of reading ability: Multivariate evidence for a convergent skills model of reading development. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R. K., Muse, A. E., & Tannenbaum, K. R. (Eds.). (2007). Vocabulary acquisition: Implications for reading comprehension New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Weinberger, D. R., Egan, M. F., Bertolino, A., Callicott, J. H., Mattay, V. S., Lipska, B. K., et al. (2001). Prefrontal neurons and the genetics of schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry, 50, 825–844.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wijsman, E. M., Peterson, D., Leutenegger, A. L., Thomson, J. B., Goddard, K. A. B., Hsu, L., et al. (2000). Segregation analysis of phenotypic components of learning disabilities: I. Nonword memory and digit span. American Journal of Human Genetics, 67, 631–646.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA.Google Scholar
Yazdkhasti, F., & Harizuka, S. (2006). The effects of temperament and perceived maternal rejection on childhood anxiety and behaviour problems. School Psychology International, 27, 105–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar