Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:43:18.820Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Survival in Justice”: An Afrikaner Debate over Apartheid

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

Hermann Giliomee
Hermann Giliomee
Affiliation:
University of Cape Town
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Within nationalist movements a tension typically exists between group demands for ethnic self-preservation and the more universal demands of religious belief, professional commitment, or academic vocation which confront particularly the intelligentsia in the group. Ethnic politicians tend to argue that decades or centuries of oppression or the anticipated disastrous consequences of a loss of self-determination makes loyalty to the group and its leadership's strategies a matter of overriding importance. It is usually exceptional individuals, often poets or novelists, who in times of crisis issue the challenge that survival be reconciled with universal values and prevailing international political norms.

Type
The Ethics of Difference
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , July 1994 , pp. 527 - 548
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Walzer, Michael, The Company of Critics: Social Criticism and Political Commitment in the Twentieth Century (New York: Basic Books, 1988), 234–5.Google Scholar For a more philosophical statement, see his Interpretation and Social Criticism (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

2 Walzer, , The Company of Critics, 232.Google Scholar

3 Ibid., 70.

4 Buber, Martin, Israel and the World: Essays in a time of Crisis (New York: Schocken, 1963), 248.Google Scholar

5 Buber, Martin, A Land of Two Peoples: Martin Buber on Jews and Arabs, MendesFlohr, Paul R., ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983), p. 223.Google Scholar

6 Buber, Martin, “Hebrew Humanism”, in Herzberg, Arthur, ed., The Zionist Idea (New York: Atheneum, 1972), 457–63.Google Scholar

7 Buber, Martin, “From an Open Letter to Mahatma Gandhi (1939),” The Zionist Idea, 463.Google Scholar

8 Buber, , “Open Letter to Gandhi,” 463–4.Google Scholar

9 Ibid., 465.

10 Memmi, Albert, quoted by Walzer, Michael, in “Commitment and Social Criticism: Camus's Algerian War,” Dissent (Fall 1984), 427.Google Scholar

11 Walzer, , The Company of Critics, 150.Google Scholar

12 Camus, Albert, Resistance, Rebellion and Death (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1961), 141.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., 113–4.

14 Walzer, , The Company of Critics, 145.Google Scholar

15 Cited by Walzer, , The Company of Critics, 151.Google Scholar

16 Banac, Ivo, “Political Change and National Diversity,” Daedalus, 119:1 (1990), 141–59.Google Scholar

17 The Washington Post (19 October 1992), pp. A16–A18.Google Scholar

18 Katzew, Henry, Apartheid and Survival (Cape Town: Simondium Publishers, 1965), 42.Google Scholar

19 Louw, N. P. van Wyk, Liberale Nasionalisme (Cape Town: Nasionale Boekhandel, 1958), 58.Google Scholar

20 Louw, , Liberale Nasionalisme, 53.Google Scholar

21 Ibid., 67.

22 Ibid., 63.

23 Ibid., 108.

24 Ibid., 106–9.

25 Ibid., 105.

26 Posel, Deborah, The Making of Apartheid, 1948–1961: Conflict and Compromise (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991) 50–58, 126–7.Google Scholar

27 See the discussion of the report by Ashford, Adam, The Politics of Official Discourse in Twentieth-Century South Africa (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), 149–94.Google Scholar

28 Fagan, H. A., Our Responsibility (Stellenbosch: Universiteit Uitgewers, 1959), 44. This book was also published in Afrikaans under the title, Ons Verantwoordelikheid.Google Scholar

29 Fagan, , Our Responsibility, 45.Google Scholar

30 Ibid., 54.

31 Ibid., 92.

32 Ibid., 93.

33 Donges, T. E. in Die Transvaler (17 December 1952).Google Scholar

34 Pelzer, A. N., ed., Vetwoerd Speaks: Speeches, 1948–1966 (Johannesburg: APB Publishers, 1966), 121.Google Scholar

35 Kinghom, J., ed., Die NG Kerk en Apartheid (Johannesburg: Macmillan, 1986).Google Scholar

36 Louw, N. P. van Wyk, “Introduction to D. P. Botha,” Die Opkoms van die Derde Stand (Cape Town: Human en Rousseau, 1960).Google Scholar

37 For critical assessments by two Afrikaans-speaking intellectuals, see Ross, R. E. van der, Onvoldoende Liberalisme (N. P. van Wyck Louw Memorial Lecture) (Randse Afrikaanse Universiteit, 1986)Google Scholar; Olivier, Gerrit, N. P. van Wvk Louw: Literatuur, Filosofie, Politiek (Cape Town: Human en Rousseau, 1992).Google Scholar

38 Horowitz, Donald, Ethnic Groups in Conflict (Berkeley: University of Califomia Press, 1986) 179–80.Google Scholar

39 Urquhart, Brian, Hammerskjold (London: Godley Head, 1973), 498.Google Scholar

40 Simkins, C.E.W., “Agricultural Production in the African Reserves of South Africa, 1918–1969,” Journal of Southern African Studies, 7 (1981), 256–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

41 See Die Burger, “Dawie' column” and “Terug na ons Geloof in Vryheid” (6 06 1964), reprinted in Louw, Louis, ed., Dawie (Cape Town: Tafelberg, 1965), 285–90.Google Scholar

42 Die Burger (4 July 1970), “Editorial”.

43 Klerk, Willem de, “The Concepts ‘Verkramp’ and ‘Verlig,’” in Rhoodie, N. J., ed., South African Dialogue (Johannesburg: McGraw Hill, 1972), 520–31.Google Scholar

44 Cited by Posel, Deborah, “The Language of Domination, 1978–1983,” in Marks, Shula and Trapido, Stanley, eds., The Politics of Race, Class and Nation alism in Twentieth Century South Africa (London: Longman, 1987), 435.Google Scholar

45 Schrire, Robert, Adaptor Die: The End of White Politics (New York: Ford Foundation, 1991), 37–56.Google Scholar

46 Sunday Times (13 March 1979).Google Scholar

47 Jacobson, Dan, “Among the South Africans,” Commentary, 65:3 (1978), 32–48.Google Scholar

48 Adam, Heribert and Giliomee, Hermann, Ethnic Power Mobilized, Can South Africa Change? (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1979), 14.Google Scholar

49 Cited by Degenaar, , Voortbestaan in Geregtigheid, 32.Google Scholar

50 Die Burger (13 November 1976), “Dawie” column.Google Scholar

51 Die Burger, “Dawie” column (10 November 1976). See also the column of 6 November 1976.Google Scholar

52 Viljoen, G. Van N., Ideaal en Werklikheid (Cape Town: Tafelberg, 1978), 31–33.Google Scholar

53 Louw, , Liberale Nasionalisme, 62–63.Google Scholar

54 Viljoen, G. van N., Die Kwaliteit van ons Oorlewing,” Aambeeld, 6:1 (1978), 4–5.Google Scholar

55 Viljoen, , Ideaal en Werklikheid, 33.Google Scholar

56 Ibid., 16, 31–33, 40–41, 62.

57 Sti11, the question of numbers haunted the leadership. Botha reportedly ordered the withdrawal of troops from Angola rather than lose 300 men.

58 Viljoen, G. van N., “‘Wat is n Volk?’: die aktualiteit Van Wyk Louw se riglyne vir die nasionalisme,” in Rensburg, F.I.J. van, ed., Oopgelate Kring (Cape Town: Tafelberg, 1982), 141.Google Scholar

59 Ibid., 23.

60 Ibid., 25.

61 Die Burger (13 July 1978).Google Scholar

62 Brink, Andre P., Literatuur in die Strvdperk (Cape Town: Human en Rousseau, 1985), 155.Google Scholar

63 Breytenbach, Breyten, End Papers (New York: McGraw Hill, 1986) 237Google Scholar; Walzer, , The Company of Critics, 217.Google Scholar

64 Lasarus, B. B. (pseud., Breyten Breytenbach), n Seisoen in die Paradys (Johannesburg: Perskor, 1976), 121 (my translation).Google Scholar

65 Breytenbach, Breyten, True Confessions of an Albino Terrorist (New York: Straus Giroux, 1983), 354–5.Google Scholar

66 Breytenbach, , End Papers, 56.Google Scholar

67 Walzer, (The Company of Critics, 219) observes that since his release, Breytenbach seemed to resent the sharing in the shame, adding “perhaps he feels that the years in prison has burned the shame out of him.”Google Scholar

68 Lasarus, , (pseud., Breyten Breytenbach), n Seisoen in die Paradys, 126.Google Scholar

69 Die Suld-Afrikaan (Fall 1986), 12.Google Scholar

70 He cited the comment of Heinz Kloss, a German-American authority who called the language movement “an outstanding achievement” (Stevn, J. C., “Die wederopstanding van die Bose Bir,” Aambeeld, 8:1 ], 5).Google Scholar

71 Steyn, J. C., Tuiste in Eie Taal (Cape Town: Tafelberg, 1980), 452–3.Google Scholar

72 Toit, Andre du, Die Sondes van die Vaders (Cape Town: Rubicon, 198?), 26.Google Scholar

73 Toit, Du, Sondes van die Vaders, 32.Google Scholar

74 Walzer, Michael, Interpretation and Social Criticism (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987), 38–39, 54–59.Google Scholar

75 Degenaar, J. J., Voortbestaan in Geregtigheid (Cape Town: Tafelberg, 1980), 1–5.Google Scholar See also his “Die betekenis van N. P. Van Wyk Louw Vir my eie denke,” Standpunte, 37:5 (1984), 49–59.Google Scholar

76 Degenaar, , Voortbestaan in Geregtigheid, 11.Google Scholar

77 Slabbert, F. van Zyl and Welsh, David, South Africa's Options (Cape Town: David Philip, 1979) 90, 170.Google Scholar

78 Lombard, E. G., “Elite-houdings oor onderhandeling in Suid-Afrika” (M. A. dissertation, University of Stellenbosch, 1991).Google Scholar

79 Quoted in “The Deadly Silence of Church Leaders,” The Star International Weekly (15–21 October 1992).Google Scholar

80 Fukuyama, Francis, The End of History and the Last Man (New York: The Free Press, 1992). PP. xi-xxiii, 168–191.Google Scholar

81 Interview, David Frost with De Klerk, broadcast on 14 February 1993 (official transcript issued by the office of the State President).

82 Rapport, 8 May 1994, p. 21.Google Scholar

83 For a full discussion, see Giliomee, Hermann, “Democratization in South Africa”, Political Science Quarterly (forthcoming).Google Scholar