Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:41:57.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Professional Autonomy Reconsidered: The Case of Czech Medicine under State Socialism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2012

Lily M. Hoffman
Lily M. Hoffman
Affiliation:
City College and Graduate Center, The City University of New York
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The opening of the formerly closed, state socialist societies of East Central Europe has provided the opportunity to bring new empirical evidence to bear upon models of profession-state relations developed in pluralist western societies. The classic view of Tocqueville and Durkheim has been that professions are an intermediary group linking individuals and the state. Although not always explicitly stated, this model served as the basis for scholarly work on the professions in the post-World War II period, where it (more or less) fit the image of a differentiated pluralist society. Most work on the professions was based on the Anglo-American case.

But even in the United States, state support was more central to maintaining professional authority than was originally thought. Without explicitly discarding the model, Freidson (1970) introduced a distinction between corporate and technical (clinical) autonomy that provided a way out of the paradox he identified, that both aspects of professional autonomy are protected by the state. Corporate autonomy refers to the political power of the organized profession to define the social and economic context of professional work, and clinical autonomy, to the control of decision making in the workplace. Testing his hypothesis on the United States, the United Kingdom, and the Soviet Union, Freidson argued that despite differing degrees of corporate autonomy, the medical profession retained clinical control of decision making, the core of professional autonomy, even in the extreme case of the former Soviet Union.

Type
Occupational Identity
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 39 , Issue 2 , April 1997 , pp. 346 - 372
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albert, Alexa, Bennett, Charles, and Bojar, Martin. 1992. “Health Care in the Czech Republic.” Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) 267:18, May 13, 2461–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andrulis Dennis, P., Bojar, Martin, and Griffo, William. 1991. “The Health Care System and Health Care Reform in Czechoslovakia.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Bílek, V.; and Balogh., J. 1977. “Doctors of the first line in Czechoslovakia.” International Social Science Journal, 24:3, 143–7.Google Scholar
Bojar, Martin, 1992. “Europe without Frontiers.” Speech in London. Prague: Ministry of Health. April.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1977. “Cultural Reproduction and Social Reproduction,” in Power and Ideology in Education, Karabel, V., ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1986. “The Forms of Capital,” in Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, Richardson, J., ed. New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Brain, A. G. 1985. “Health Care in Czechoslovakia.” East European Reporter, 1:1, 3–13.Google Scholar
Brenner, V.; and Hrouda, M.. 1967. “Věda a vysokoškolské vzdělani v prestiži povolání” [Science and University Education and the Prestige of the Profession]. Sociologicky casopis, 3:541–59 and 4:43–54.Google Scholar
Burrage, M.; Jarausch, K.; and Siegrist, H.. 1990. “Actor-Based Framework for Study of Professions,” 203–25, in Professions in Theory and History: Rethinking the Study of the Professions, Burrage, Michael and Torstendahl, Rolf, eds., London: Sage.Google Scholar
Charter 77 Document No. 14/84. 1984. Brain, A. G., trans. “Summary of Available Documents.” East European Reporter, 1: 1, 3–13.Google Scholar
Cleaves Peter, S. 1987. Professions and the State: The Mexican Case. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
ČSFR Health Statistics. See Institute of Health Information and Statistics.Google Scholar
Drboklav, Vlastimil. 1988. “Posilovat kvalitu péče” [To Make Health Care Better]. Zdravotnické noviny 3 (January 25), p. 1.Google Scholar
Elterlein, Eugen et al. 1985. Sociální lékařství a organizace zdravotnictví, I a II. Praktické řízení zdravotnických služeb, [Social Medicine and the Organization of Health Care I & II of Practical Management of Health Care Services]. Institut postgraduálního vzdělávání lékařů farmaceutů, Praha, CZ.Google Scholar
Field Mark, G. 1957. Doctor and Patient in Soviet Russia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field Mark, G. 1991. “The Hybrid Profession: Soviet Medicine,” 43–62, in Professions and the State: Expertise and Autonomy in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, Jones, Anthony, ed. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Friedland, Roger; and Alford, Robert R.. 1991. “Bringing Society Back In,” 232–63, in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Powell, Walter W. and DiMaggio, Paul J., eds. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Freidson, Eliot. 1970. Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Freidson, Eliot. 1993. “How Dominant Are the Professions?,” 54–66, in The Changing Medical Profession: An International Perspective, Hafferty, Federic W. and McKinlay, John B., eds. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Halliday Terence, C. 1987. Bexond Monopoly: Lawyers, State Crises, and Professional Empowerment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Halliday Terence, C. 1989. “Lawyer and the State: Neo-corporatist Variations on the Pluralist Theme of Liberal Democracy.” in Lawyer in Society: A Comparative Approach, Abel, R. and Lewis, P., eds., vol. 3 of Comparative and Theoretical Studies. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, T. C.; and Carruthers, J.. 1991. “The State and the Professional Division of Labor: Terrains of Struggle over Bankruptcy Corporate Reorganization in the U.S. and the U.K.” Paper presented at American Sociological Association, Cincinnati, Ohio.Google Scholar
Josef., Harant. 1989. Rozvoj péče o zdraví lidu podkladový materiál pro XVII sjezd KSČ [On the Development of the People's Health Care: Document prepared for the 18th Congress of the Czechoslovak Community Party], Ústav sociálního lékařství a organizace zdravotnictví [Institute of Social Medicine and Organization of Health Care.] Praha.Google Scholar
Heitlinger, Alena, 1991. “Hierarchy of Status and Prestige.” 207–32 in Professions and the State: Expertise and Autonomy in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, Jones, Anthony T., ed. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Heitlinger, Alena. 1993. “The Medical Profession in Czechoslovakia: Legacies of State Socialism. Prospects for the Capitalist Future.” 172–83, in The Changing Character of the Medical Profession: An International Perspective, Hafferty, Frederick W. and McKinlay, John B., eds.. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maria, Hirszowicz.. 1980. The Bureaucratic Leviathan. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman Lily, M. 1989. The Politics of Knowledge: Activist Movements in Medicine and Planning. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman Lily, M. 1995a. “The Institutional Career of Czech Medicine Before, During, and After State Socialism.” 61–92, in Social Reform in East-Central Europe: New Trends in Transition, vol. III, Ringen, Stein and Wallace, Claire, eds.. Prague: Prague Papers on Social Responses to Transformation. Earlier version presented at Third Prague International Workshop. “Central Eastern European Transformation.” Central European University, Prague, May 1994.Google Scholar
Hoffman Lily, M. 1995b. “The Institutional Careers of Medicine and Urban Planning in the Communist and Postcommunist Czech Republic.” 189–212. in Professions in Modern Eastern Europe/Professionen 1m Modernen Osteuropa, McClelland, Charles. Merl, Stephan, and Siegrist, Hannes, eds.. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
Hospodářske noviny. See “Léčba začíná.”Google Scholar
Information on Charter 77 No. 25. 1985. Two Anonymous Responses to the No. 14/84. January 11 and February 10. Brain, A. G., trans. East European Reporter, 1:1, 3–13.Google Scholar
Institute of Health Information and Statistics. 1990, 1991. Zdravotnická ročenka ČSFR [ČSFR Health Statistics Yearbook]. Úzis. Prague.Google Scholar
Cited as ČSFR Health Statistics. Institute of Public Opinion Research. 1993. Vzkum spokojenosti a užití sxstému lékařské péče [Survey of Satisfaction and Use of the Health Care System]. Praha. April.Google Scholar
Institute of Public Opinion Research. 1981. Výzkum spokojenosti s lékařskou péči [Survey of Satisfaction with the Health Care System]. Praha. November.Google Scholar
Janečková, , Hana, , and Hnilicová, Helena. 1992. ‘The Health Status of the Czechoslovak Population: Its Social and Ecological Determinants.” International Journal of Health Sciences, 3: 3–4 (September-December), 143–55.Google Scholar
Jaroš, . Jan. 1992. “Present and Future System of Health Care.” Paper. Prague. Czecho-slovakia: Institute of Social Medicine.Google Scholar
Jarausch Konrad, H. 1990a. “The German Professions in History and Theory.” 9–24. in German Professions, 1800–1950, Cocks, Geoffrey and Jarausch, Konrad H.. eds., New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jarausch Konrad, H. 1990b. The Unfree Professions: German Lawyers, Teachers, and Engineers, 1900–1950. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Terrence. 1982. “The State and the Professions: Peculiarities of the British.” 186–208, in Social Class and the Division of Labor, Giddens, A. and McKenzie, Gavin. eds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Terrence. 1995. “Governmentality and the Institutionalization of Expertise,” 7–24, in Health Professions and the State in Europe, Johnson, T., Larkin, G. and Saks, M., eds. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kapr, J. 1969. “Obecná struktura prestiže povolání” [The Prestige of the Profession], 377–99 in Československá společnost: sociologická analýz.a sociální stratifikace, Machonin, P. et al. eds. Bratislava: Epocha.Google Scholar
Kaše, Jiří. 1991. “Doktor a pacient v zrcadle minulých čtyřiceti let” [Doctor and Patient in the Mirror of the Past Forty Years]. Zdravotnické noviny. January 24.Google Scholar
Kennedy Michael, D. 1991, Professionals, Power and Solidarity in Poland. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimo, F. 1990. “Pohlady na daktore problemy nasho zdravotnictva” [Problems in our Health Services]. Československé zdravotnictví, 38: 8–9, 375–9. September.Google Scholar
Krause Elliott, A. 1991. “Professions and the State in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe: Theoretical Issues,” in Professions and the State: Expertise and Autonomy in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe, Jones, Anthony, ed. Philadelphia PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Larson Magali, Sarfatti. 1977. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
začina, Léčba [The Treatment Begins]. 1990. Hospodářske noviny 44 (October 31). Cited as Hospodářské noviny.Google Scholar
McClelland Charles, E. 1991. The German Experience of Professionalization. New-York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machonin, Pavel et al. , 1969. Československá společnost [Czechoslovak Society]. Bratislava: Epocha.Google Scholar
Matějů, Petr. 1990. “Who gains and who loses in a socialist redistribution?” Working Papers. Prague: Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences. Institute of Sociology.Google Scholar
Matějů, Petr. 1992. “Beyond Educational Inequality in Czechoslovakia.” Czechoslovak Sociological Review, 28: 37–60. August.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health. Czech Republic. 1990. Reform of Health Care in the Czech Republic: Version II. Prague, October. Cited as Ministry Reform Proposal II.Google Scholar
Ministry of Health. Czech Republic. 1991. Health Care as Reflected bx the Czech Press. Prague. Cited as Ministry Czech Press.Google Scholar
Ministry Czech Press. See Ministry of Health, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
Ministry Reform Proposal II. See Ministry of Health, Czech Republic.Google Scholar
Navarro, Vincente. 1977. Social Security and Medicine in the USSR: A Marxist Critique. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Niklíček, Ladislav; and Růžena, Šimberská. 1991. “Rockefellerova nadace a založení státního zdravotního ústavu republiky československé” [The Rockefeller Foundation and the Founding of the State Health Institute of the Czech Republic]. Ďejinx věd a techniky, 24:129–45.Google Scholar
Novák, Zdeněk, 1990. “Průzkumy k 'Sanci pro 3 milioný v roce 1988” [Survey of the “Chance for 3 Million” in the year 1988]. Zdravotnická vychova, 77: 5–21.Google Scholar
Pehe, Jiřf, 1990. “Changes in the Health Care System.” Radio Free Europe/Report on Eastern Europe, 1: 37 (September 14). 22–25.Google Scholar
Pelc Hynek, J. M.D., D.P.H. 1924. Organization of the Public Health Services in Czechoslovakia. Geneva: Health Section of the Secretariat of the League of Nations.Google Scholar
Penn, Roger, 1975. “Occupational Prestige Hierarchies: A Great Empirical Invariant?” Social Forces, 54: 2, 352–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenthal, J. 1993. “Is Women's Health Harmed by Medical Specialization?" New York Times. November 13, p. 1.Google Scholar
Šiklová, Jiřiná. 1992. “Analysis of the Problems Caused by the High Number of Women Physicians in Primary Health Care.” Paper, Department of Social Policy and Social Care, Charles University. Prague. October.Google Scholar
Stark, David, 1996. “Recombinant Property in East European Capitalism.” American Journal of Sociology, 101: 4 (January), 993–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starovskii, V. N. 1960. “On the Methodology of Comparing Economic Indices of the USSR and the USA.” Problems of Economics (July), 14–24.Google Scholar
Svobodný, Petr, 1993. “Czech Medical Doctors 1848–1939: Professionalization of Physicians in Bohemia and Moravia,” 145–67, in Professions in Modern Eastern Europe/Professionen Im Modernen Osteuropa, McClelland, Charles, Merl, Stephan, and Siegrist, Hannes, eds. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
Tuček, Milan, 1991. “Sociálni diferenciace v profesní sféře ve vědomí československé populace” [Social Differentiation in the Professional Sphere as seen by the Czech People]. Sociologicky časopis, 27: 4, 504–18.Google Scholar
Weinerman E., Richard. 1969. Social Medicine in Eastern Europe: The Organization of Health Services and the Education of Medical Personnel in Czechoslovakia, Hungary, and Poland. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolchik Sharon, L. 1991. Czechoslovakia in Transition: Politics, Economics and Society. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
World Bank. 1991. The Czech and Slovak Federal Republic — The Health Sector: Issues and Priorities. Washington DC: World Bank.Google Scholar