Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:06:32.045Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In Quest of New Law: The Perplexity of Legal Syncretism in Indonesia*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2009

M. A. Jaspan
M. A. Jaspan
Affiliation:
University of Western Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When Dutch rule in Indonesia came to an end in 1950 the new Republic inherited a complex legal system whose main component parts were Dutch criminal and civil law, Adat or customary law and Islamic law. The Dutch legists had been divided in their ideas about what the proper content of “Indies” law should be. Until the latter part of the nineteenth century most jurists favoured the establishment of a positive, unified legal system throughout the Netherlands East Indies, based on modern Dutch law, modified where necessary to suit local conditions. It was anticipated that as education, effective administration and new legislation progressed the authority and operation of the “irregular” or non-Western legal systems would diminish. The non-Western systems of law encompassed regional and tribal customary law, often combined with Islamic law, and the legal usages and practices of the “foreign oriental” minorities, mainly Chinese and Indian.

Type
Revolution and the Rule of Law
Information
Comparative Studies in Society and History , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , April 1965 , pp. 252 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adatrechtbundels, 43 vols. (The Hague, 1910–1949).Google Scholar
Barnes, J.A., “Law as politically active: an anthropological view”, Studies in the Sociology of Law (Canberra, Australian National University, 1961).Google Scholar
Brown, P., “From Anarchy to Satrapy”, American Anthropologist, Vol. 65, No. 1 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depernas, Rantjangan Dasar U.U. Pembangunan Nasional-Berentjana, Vol. III, Book I (Bandung, 1960).Google Scholar
Djojodigoeno, M. and Tirtawinata, R., Het adatprivaatrecht van Middel-Java (Batavia, 1940).Google Scholar
Djojodigoeno, M., Adat Law in Indonesia (Djakarta, 1952).Google Scholar
Djojodigoeno, M., Reorientasi Hukum dan Hukum Adat (Jogjakarta, 1958).Google Scholar
Fortes, M., The Dynamics of Kinship among the Tallensi (London, 1945).Google Scholar
Ginting, R., “Masa depan hak waris Karo” [The future of Karo inheritance rights] in Laporan Seminar Hak Waris Karo (Kabandjahe, 1962).Google Scholar
Gluckman, M., “Political Institutions” in The Institutions of Primitive Society (Oxford, 1954).Google Scholar
Gluckman, M., Custom and Conflict in Africa (Oxford, 1955).Google Scholar
Haar, B. ter, Adat Law in Indonesia (Revised English translation) (Djakarta, 1962).Google Scholar
Hazairin, Hukum Baru di Indonesia (Djakarta, 1950).Google Scholar
Hazairin, , Hukum Kewarisan Bilateral Menurut Al-Qur'an (Djakarta, 1961).Google Scholar
Josselin de Jong, J.P.B.de, Customary Law (A Confusing Fiction) (Amsterdam, 1948).Google Scholar
Kahin, G.M., Nationalism and Revolution in Indonesia (Ithaca, 1952).Google Scholar
Koentjaraningrat, , Beberapa metode anthropologi dalam penjelidikan masjarakat dan kebudajaan di Indonesia (Djakarta, 1958).Google Scholar
Levy, R., The Social Structure of Islam (Cambridge, 1957).Google Scholar
Logemann, J.H.A., Staatsrecht van Nederlandsch-Indië (The Hague, 1947).Google Scholar
Malinowski, B., Crime and Custom in Savage Society (London, 1926).Google Scholar
M.P.R.S. Ringkasan Ketetapan No. 11 (Djakarta, 1960).Google Scholar
Nasroen, M., Dasar Falsafah Adat Minangkabau (Djakarta, 1957).Google Scholar
Pandecten van het Adatrecht (Amsterdam, 1916–1936).Google Scholar
Prins, J., Adat en Islamietische Plichtenleer in Indonesië (Bandung, 1960).Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, A.R., “Primitive Law” in Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences (New York, 1933).Google Scholar
Soepomo, R., Het adatprivaatrecht van West-Java (Batavia, 1933).Google Scholar
Soepomo, R., Bab-bab tentang Hukum Adat (Djakarta, 1958).Google Scholar
Stanner, W.E.H., The South Seas in Transition (Sydney, 1953).Google Scholar
Subandrio, H., “Adat Law in Indonesia”, The Islamic Review, Vol. 50, No. 7–8–9 (Woking, 1962).Google Scholar
Suprapto, , “Dasar pokok, fungsi, sifat-sifat dan bentuk hukum nasional”, Seriwidjaja, No. 4 (Palembang, 1963).Google Scholar
Tamboen, P., Adat-istiadat Karo (Djakarta, 1952).Google Scholar
Utrecht, E., Pengantar dalam Hukum Indonesia, 5th ed. (Djakarta, 1959).Google Scholar
Vollenhoven, C. van, Het adatrecht van Nederlandsch-Indië, 3 vols. (Leiden, 1918–1933).Google Scholar