Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:13:01.384Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some factors affecting the relation between the clay minerals in soils and their plasticity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2018

M. J. Dumbleton  and
G. West
M. J. Dumbleton
Affiliation:
Road Research Laboratory, Ministry of Transport, Harmondsworth, Middlesex
G. West
Affiliation:
Road Research Laboratory, Ministry of Transport, Harmondsworth, Middlesex
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The clay mineral composition is one of the factors that affect the physical properties of soils, and a knowledge of it is required to promote a fuller understanding of the origin of these properties. The relationships between the clay content and the plastic and liquid limits of natural montmorillonitic and kaolinitic soils and of artificial mixtures have been examined and compared. Factors affecting the relationships are discussed, and illustrated by the effect of particle aggregation on the measurement of the liquid limit of tropical red clays and on the sedimentation analysis of the Keuper Marl. The effect of muscovite and of silt-sized material on the position of soils on the Casagrande classification chart has also been examined.

Type
Research Article
Information
Clay Minerals , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , July 1966 , pp. 179 - 193
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Casagrande, A. (1947) Proc. Am. Soc. civ. Engrs 73, 783.Google Scholar
Coleman, J.D., Farrar, D.M. & Marsh, A.D. (1964) Géotechnique 14, 262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumbleton, M.J. (1963a) Dep. sclent, ind. Res., Rd Res. Lab. Note No. LN/372/MJD.Google Scholar
Dumbleton, M.J. (1963b) Proc. 2nd Asian Conf. Soil Mech. Found. Eng., Tokyo 2, 63.Google Scholar
Dumbleton, M.J. (1965) Appendix I to K.E. Clare & P.J. Beaven. Dep. scient. ind. Res., Rd Res. Lab. Tech. Pap. No. 68. H.M.S.O., London.Google Scholar
Dumbleton, M.J. & Newill, D. (1962) Dep. scient. ind. Res., Rd Res. Lab. Note No. LN/44/MJD.DN.Google Scholar
Dumbleton, M.J., West, G. & Newill, D. (1966) Engng Geol. 1, 235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grim, R.E. (1962) Applied Clay Mineralogy. McGraw-Hill, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newill, D. (1961) Géotechnique 11, 302.Google Scholar
Robertson, R.H.S. (1951) Tonind.-Zg. keram. Rdsch. 75, 2.Google Scholar
Robertson, R.H.S. (1958) Appendix to K. Terzaghi. Proc. Instn. civ. Engrs 9, 369.Google Scholar
Russam, K. & Dumbleton, M.J. (1964) Proc. 2nd Conf. Austr. Rd Res. Bd. Paper No. 186.Google Scholar
Terzaghi, K. (1958) Proc. Instn. civ. Engrs 9, 369.Google Scholar
Tubey, L.W. (1961) Dep. scient. ind. Res., Rd Res. Lab. Note No. RN/4077/LWT.Google Scholar
White, W.A. (1949) Am. Miner. 34, 508.Google Scholar