Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T12:30:41.803Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Archaelogy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 October 2009

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 20 , Issue 5 , June 1906 , pp. 280 - 285
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1906

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 282 note 1 If it lay quite close to the Curia, where S. Martina and S. Adriano are now, then, as Jordan says, ‘nullo interpretationis artificio aut explicandi aut laxandi vocabulum posset ad totius loci sententiam adaptari. nam ad eam usque regionem fori fines expliciti fuere a principio.’

page 282 note 2 On the fourth (along the front of the Basilica Aemilia) the alteration of the line of the Cloaca Maxima under the early empire led to their destruction.

page 283 note 1 Richter himself states his opinion far more dogmatically in his Topographie (p. 87) than in this article, without bringing forward any fresh arguments in its favour.

page 284 note 1 Times, May 8, 1906; Pausanias iii. 16, 6 with Frazer's notes ad loc.

page 285 note 1 Berl. Phil. Woch., April 28, 1906.

page 285 note 2 Notizie degli Scavi, 1905, part 5.

page 285 note 3 Ibid, part 10.