No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2009
page 315 note 1 Philodemus, surprisingly neglected by Schenkeveld, has both forms: from the first fifty pages of Sudhaus οὐδ⋯〈ν〉 3. 20; οὐδαμ⋯〈ς〉 11. 22; οὐθ⋯ν 13. 3, 34. 31, 41. 9; οὐδεμ⋯α〈ν〉 50. 10.
page 316 note 1 See Führmann, M., Zur Textgeschichte der pseudo-aristotelischen Alexander-Rhetorik, Mainz, 1964, pp. 696 ff.Google Scholar
page 316 note 2 I owe this point to Mr. D. A. Russell.