No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Horace, Odes, Book I - R. G. M. Nisbet and Margaret Hubbard: A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book I. Pp. lviii+440. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970. Cloth, £4·20.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2009
Abstract
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Classical Association 1971
References
1 Soubiran (p. 588) says 1·6 per cent, but his arithmetic is slightly faulty. His figure of 3 per cent for Calpurnius (p. 561) is taken from Sturtevant and Kent and is certainly too high.
2 See, for instance, apropos of ‘homodyne’ and ‘heterodyne’, Greenberg, N. A., ‘Vergil and the computer: fourth foot texture in Aeneid I,’ Org. int. pour l'étude des langues anciennes par ordinateur, Revue 1967, no. 1, 1–16Google Scholar, confirming the scepticism expressed on non-statistical grounds by Wilkinson, L. P., Golden Latin Artistry (1963), p. 128.Google Scholar