Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T14:49:49.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Horace, Odes, Book I - R. G. M. Nisbet and Margaret Hubbard: A Commentary on Horace, Odes, Book I. Pp. lviii+440. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970. Cloth, £4·20.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2009

M. L. Clarke
M. L. Clarke
Affiliation:
University College of North Wales, Bangor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Information
The Classical Review , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , June 1971 , pp. 203 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © The Classical Association 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Soubiran (p. 588) says 1·6 per cent, but his arithmetic is slightly faulty. His figure of 3 per cent for Calpurnius (p. 561) is taken from Sturtevant and Kent and is certainly too high.

2 See, for instance, apropos of ‘homodyne’ and ‘heterodyne’, Greenberg, N. A., ‘Vergil and the computer: fourth foot texture in Aeneid I,’ Org. int. pour l'étude des langues anciennes par ordinateur, Revue 1967, no. 1, 1–16Google Scholar, confirming the scepticism expressed on non-statistical grounds by Wilkinson, L. P., Golden Latin Artistry (1963), p. 128.Google Scholar